Proportional electoral rules are associated with more substantial women’s representation than majoritarian ones. To provide causal evidence that electoral rules affect women’s representation and the qualification of politicians, we collect panel data on the universe of Italian politicians from all levels of government over the period 1987–2013 and analyse an Italian reform which, in 2005, changed the electoral rule for national elections from (mostly) majoritarian to proportional, but did not affect subnational level elections. We find that this reform increased the number of women elected by 5%, while not decreasing the overall qualification levels of politicians, measured by the level of education and political experience. We provide evidence that the highest qualification women are not elected and that the overall qualification of elected politicians could have increased (rather than remain constant) if the best women candidates had been elected.
BaguesM.,CampaP. (2021). Can gender quotas in candidate lists empower women? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Journal of Public Economics, 194, Article 104315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104315.
2.
BaguesM. F.,Esteve-VolartB. (2010). Can gender parity break the glass ceiling? Evidence from a repeated randomized experiment. The Review of Economic Studies, 77(4), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2009.00601.x.
3.
BaltrunaiteA.BelloP.CasaricoA.ProfetaP. (2014). Gender quotas and the quality of politicians. Journal of Public Economics, 118, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.008.
4.
BarnesT. D.,HolmanM. R. (2019). Taking diverse backgrounds into account in studies of political ambition and representation. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(4), 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1532916.
5.
BecherM.,GonzálezI. M. (2019). Electoral reform and trade-offs in representation. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 694–709. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000145.
6.
BesleyT.FolkeO.PerssonT.RickneJ. (2017). Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man: theory and evidence from Sweden. American Economic Review, 107(8), 2204–2242. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160080.
BesleyT. J.PandeR.RaoV. (2005). Political selection and the quality of government: Evidence from South India. Social Science Research Network (SSRN).
9.
BesleyT.,Reynal-QuerolM. (2011). Do democracies select more educated leaders?American Political Science Review, 105(3), 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000281.
10.
BrattonK. A.,RayL. P. (2002). Descriptive representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088386.
11.
BuitragoM. P.,ArocaM. P. (2017). Effects of institutional reforms on women’s representation in Colombia, 1960–2014. Latin American Politics and Society, 59(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/laps.12020.
12.
CareyJ. M.,ShugartM. S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral studies, 14(4), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2.
13.
CarnesN.,LupuN. (2016). What good is a college degree? Education and leader quality reconsidered. The Journal of Politics, 78(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/683027.
14.
CastiglioniM. (2020). Ideological and non-ideological camp effects on local resource misallocation. MPSA Annual Conference.
CayerN. J.,SigelmanL. (1980). Minorities and women in state and local government: 1973-1975. Public Administration Review, 40(5), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110199.
DolanK. (2014). Gender stereotypes, candidate evaluations, and voting for women candidates: What really matters?Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913487949.
19.
DolanK. (2018). Voting for women: How the public evaluates women candidates. Routledge.
20.
DolanK.,LynchT. (2016). The impact of gender stereotypes on voting for women candidates by level and type of office. Politics & Gender, 12(3), 573–595. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x16000246.
21.
FolkeO.,RickneJ. (2016). Electoral competition and gender differences in political careers. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11(1), 59–102. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014161.
22.
FoxR. L.,LawlessJ. L. (2010). If only they’d ask: Gender, recruitment, and political ambition. The Journal of Politics, 72(2), 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609990752.
23.
FoxR. L.,LawlessJ. L. (2011). Gendered perceptions and political candidacies: A central barrier to women’s equality in electoral politics. American Journal of Political Science, 55(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00484.x.
24.
FoxR. L.,LawlessJ. L. (2014). Uncovering the origins of the gender gap in political ambition. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 499–519. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000227.
25.
FranceschetS.,PiscopoJ. M. (2013). Equality, democracy, and the broadening and deepening of gender quotas. Politics & Gender, 9(3), 310–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x13000184.
GalassoV.,NanniciniT. (2015). So closed: Political selection in proportional systems. European Journal of Political Economy, 40, 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.04.008.
30.
GolderS.StephensonL.Van der StraetenK.BlaisA.BolD.HarfstP.LaslierJ.-F. (2017). Votes for women: Electoral systems and support for female candidates. Politics & Gender, 13(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x16000684.
31.
HangartnerD.DinasE.MarbachM.MatakosK.XefterisD. (2019). Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile?American Political Science Review, 113(2), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055418000813.
32.
HayesD.,LawlessJ. (2016). Women on the run: Gender, media, and political campaigns in a polarized era. Cambridge University Press.
33.
HessamiZ.,BaskaranT. (2019). Competitively elected women as policy makers. Social Science Research Network (SSRN).
34.
HessamiZ.,Lopes da FonsecaM. (2020). Female political representation and substantive effects on policies: A literature review. European Journal of Political Economy, 63, Article 101896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101896.
35.
HinojosaM. (2009). “Whatever the party asks of me”: Women’s political representation in Chile’s Unión Demócrata Independiente. Politics & Gender, 5(3), 377–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x09990183.
36.
HinojosaM. (2012). Selecting women, electing women: Political representation and candidate selection in Latin America. Temple University Press.
37.
HughesM. M. (2011). Intersectionality, quotas, and minority women’s political representation worldwide. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000293.
38.
Inter-Parliamentary Union (2016). Women in parliament in 2016: The year in review. http://ow.ly/OSRJ50ykpGb.
IversenT.,RosenbluthF. M. (2010). Women, work, and politics: The political economy of gender inequality. Yale University Press.
41.
JacobsonG. C. (1989). Strategic politicians and the dynamics of US house elections, 1946–86. American Political Science Review, 83(3), 773–793. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962060.
42.
KanthakK.,WoonJ. (2015). Women don’t run? Election aversion and candidate entry. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12158.
43.
KingJ. D. (2002). Single-member districts and the representation of women in American state legislatures: The effects of electoral system change. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 2(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000200200203.
44.
KittilsonM. C.,Schwindt-BayerL. (2012). The gendered effects of electoral institutions: Political engagement and participation. Oxford University Press.
LawlessJ.,FoxR. (2010). It still takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. Cambridge University Press.
47.
Le BarbanchonT.,SauvagnatJ.Voter bias and women in politics. Journal of the European Economic Association. forthcominghttps://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvab028.
48.
MatlandR. (2005). Enhancing women’s political participation: legislative recruitment and electoral systems. Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, 2, 93–111.
49.
MatlandR. E.,StudlarD. T. (1996). The contagion of women candidates in single-member district and proportional representation electoral systems: Canada and Norway. The Journal of Politics, 58(3), 707–733. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960439.
50.
MilliganK.MorettiE.OreopoulosP. (2004). Does education improve citizenship? Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 1667–1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.005.
51.
MurrayR. (2010). Second among unequals? A study of whether France’s “quota women” are up to the job. Politics & Gender, 6(1), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x09990523.
MurrayR. (2015). What makes a good politician? Reassessing the criteria used for political recruitment. Politics & Gender, 11(4), 770–776. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x15000513.
NorrisP.,LovenduskiJ. (1993). Gender and party politics. Sage Publications.
57.
NorrisP.,LovenduskiJ. (1995). Political recruitment: Gender, race and class in the British Parliament. Cambridge University Press.
58.
O’BrienD.,RickneJ. (2016). Gender quotas and women’s political leadership. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000611.
O’GradyT. (2019). How do economic circumstances determine preferences? Evidence from long-run panel data. British Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 1381–1406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000242.
61.
ProfetaP.,WoodhouseE. F. (2021). Replication data and code for ‘Electoral rules, women’s representation and the qualification of politicians’. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VMPZIX.
62.
RobertsA.SeawrightJ.CyrJ. (2013). Do electoral laws affect women’s representation?Comparative Political Studies, 46(12), 1555–1581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463906.
63.
RuleW. (1981). Why women don’t run: The critical contextual factors in women’s legislative recruitment. Western Political Quarterly, 34(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298103400106.
64.
RuleW. (1987). Electoral systems, contextual factors and women’s opportunity for election to parliament in twenty-three democracies. Western Political Quarterly, 40(3), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298704000307.
65.
RuleW. (1994). Women’s underrepresentation and electoral systems. Political Science & Politics, 27(4), 689–692. https://doi.org/10.2307/420369.
66.
RuleW.,ShugartM. (1995). The preference vote and the election of women. University of Exeter. http://ow.ly/j6Bk50ykpwK.
67.
RuleW.,ZimmermanJ. F. (1994). Electoral systems in comparative perspective: Their impact on women and minorities. Greenwood Publishing Group.
68.
ShugartM. S. (1994). Minorities represented and unrepresented. In RuleW.ZimmermanJ. F. (Eds.), Electoral systems in comparative perspective: Their impact on women and minorities. Greenwood Publishing Group.
69.
ShugartM. S.ValdiniM. E.SuominenK. (2005). Looking for locals: Voter information demands and personal vote-earning attributes of legislators under proportional representation. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00133.x.
70.
ThamesF. (2017). Understanding the impact of electoral systems on women’s representation. Politics & Gender, 13(3), 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x16000325.
71.
The Economist Intelligence Unit (2019). Democracy index 2019. http://www.eiu.com.
72.
ValdiniM. E. (2013). Electoral institutions and the manifestation of bias: The effect of the personal vote on the representation of women. Politics & Gender, 9(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x12000700.
73.
VengroffR.NyiriZ.FugieroM. (2003). Electoral system and gender representation in sub-national legislatures: Is there a national—sub-national gender gap?Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.2307/3219895.
74.
WeeksA. C.,BaldezL. (2015). Quotas and qualifications: The impact of gender quota laws on the qualifications of legislators in the Italian parliament. European Political Science Review, 7(1), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000095.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
