Democracy and women’s rights are integrally “bundled” by the international community. This means that dictatorships can signal adherence to international norms by demonstrating progress on gender equality, often in a manner that is consistent with the perpetuation of authoritarian rule. Using a new dataset of de jure advances in women’s rights, we show that dictatorships have vigorously enacted gender-related legislation, at a rate that surpasses democracies in the developing world. This pattern is shaped by international (Western) pressure: Among autocracies, foreign aid dependence and international nongovernmental organization shaming are associated with legal advances in women’s rights, but not with reforms in other, more politically costly areas related to elections, political competition, and repression. Our account therefore highlights selective compliance as a form of adaptation to international pressure and underscores the role of international incentives as a complement to domestic “bottom-up” pressure for women’s rights in dictatorships.
AndersonM.SwissL. (2014). Peace accords and the adoption of electoral quotas for women in the developing world, 1990-2006. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 495-510.
2.
ArriolaL. R.JohnsonM. C. (2014). “Ethnic politics and women’s empowerment in Africa: Ministerial appointments to executive cabinets. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 495-510.
3.
AsunkaJ.BrierleyS.GoldenM.KramonE.OfosuG. (2019). Electoral fraud or violence: The effect of observers on party manipulation strategies. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 129-151.
4.
BagwellS.HallS. L. (2020). Publicity and perceptions of risk: The effects of HRO naming and shaming on sovereign credit rating. Journal of Human Rights, 19(3), 379-391.
5.
BaileyJ. L. (2008). Arrested development: The fight to end commercial whaling as a case of failed norm change. European Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 289-318.
6.
BarnettC. (2019). Authoritarianism and the family: Women’s rights reforms and the limits of gender equality in Morocco. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 2019.
7.
BarryC. M.Chad ClayK.FlynnM. E. (2013). Avoiding the spotlight: Human rights shaming and foreign direct investment. International Studies Quarterly, 57(3), 532-544.
8.
BeaulieuE.HydeS. D. (2009). In the shadow of democracy promotion: Strategic manipulation, international observers and election boycotts. Comparative Political Studies, 42(3), 392-415.
9.
Beiser-McGrathJ.MetternichN. W. (2021). Ethnic coalitions and the logic of political survival in authoritarian regimes. Comparative Political Studies, 54(1), 144-178.
10.
Bénassy-QuéréA.CoupetM.MayerT. (2007). Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment. The World Economy, 30(5), 764-782.
11.
BermeoS. B. (2016). Aid is not oil: Donor utility, heterogeneous aid, and the aid-democratization relationship. International Organization, 70, 1-32.
12.
BjarnegårdE.ZetterbergP. (2016). Gender equality reforms on an uneven playing field: Candidate selection and quota implementation in electoral authoritarian Tanzania. Government and Opposition, 51(03), 464-486.
BruceJ. W.RenéeG.LeonardR.Jr.DavidB.RobertM. (2006). Land law reform: Achieving development policy objectives. World Bank Law, Justice and Development Series.
15.
Bueno de MesquitaB.SmithA.SiversonR. M.MorrowJ. D. (2005). The logic of political survival. MIT Press.
16.
BuitelaarT.HirschmannG. (2020). Criminal accountability at what cost? Norm conflict, international peace operations and the international criminal court. European Journal of International Relations.
17.
BushS. S. (2011). International politics and the spread of quotas for women in legislatures (Vol. 65). Cambridge University Press.
18.
BushS. S. (2015). The taming of democracy assistance. Cambridge University Press.
19.
BushS.DonnoD.ZetterbergP. (2021). Rewarding women’s rights in dictatorships. Working Paper.
20.
BushS. S.JamalA. A. (2015). Anti-Americanism, authoritarian politics, and attitudes about women’s representation: Evidence from a survey experiment in Jordan. International Studies Quarterly, 59(1), 34-45.
21.
BushS. S.ZetterbergP. (2020). Gender quotas and international reputation. American Journal of Political Science, 65(2), 326-341.
22.
CarnegieA.MarinovN. (2017). Foreign aid, human rights, and democracy promotion: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 61(3), 671-683.
23.
CarothersT. (2007). The “sequencing”; Fallacy. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 12-27.
ColeW. M. (2013a). Government respect for gendered rights: The effect of the convention on the elimination of discrimination against women’s rights outcomes, 1981-2004. International Studies Quarterly, 57(2), 233-249.
26.
ColeW. M. (2013b). Government respect for gendered rights: The effects of the convention on the elimination of discrimination against women on women’s rights outcomes, 1981-2004. International Studies Quarterly, 57, 233-249.
27.
ConradC.DeMerittJ. (2019). Repression substitution: Shifting human rights violations in response to UN naming and shaming. Civil Wars, 21(1), 128-152.
CooleyA. (2015b). The emerging politics of international rankings and ratings: A framework for analysis. In CooleyASnyderJ (Ed.), Ranking the world (pp. 1-38). Cambridge University Press.
30.
CooleyA.SnyderJ. (2015). Ranking the world: Grading states as a tool of global governance. Cambridge University Press.
31.
CoppedgeM.GerringJ.LindbergS. I. (2015) Varieties of democracy project codebook (v4).
32.
DahlerupD. (2006). Women, quotas and politics. Routledge.
33.
DavidA.NanesS. (2011). The women’s quota in Jordan’s municipal councils: International and domestic dimensions. Journal of Women, Politics Policy, 32(4), 275-304.
34.
DembinskiM. (2016). Procedural justice and global order: Explaining African reaction to the application of global protection norms. European Journal of International Relations, 23(4), 809-832.
35.
DeMerittJ. H. R. (2012). International organizations and government killing: Does naming and shaming save lives?International Interactions, 38(5), 597-621.
36.
DietrichS. (2011). The politics of public health aid: Why corrupt governments have incentives to implement aid effectively. World Development, 39(1), 55-63.
37.
DietrichS. (2013). Bypass or engage? Explaining donor delivery tactics in foreign aid allocation. International Studies Quarterly, 57(4), 698-712.
38.
DietrichS.MurdieA. (2017). Human rights shaming through INGOs and foreign aid delivery. Review of International Organizations, 12, 95-120.
39.
DietrichS.WrightJ. (2015). Foreign aid allocation tactics and democratic change in Africa. The Journal of Politics, 77(1), 216-234.
40.
DonnellyJ. (2007). The relative universality of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(2), 281-306.
41.
DonnoD.FoxS.KaasikJ. (2021). International incentives for women’s rights in dictatorships. Harvard Dataverse. doi: 10.7910/DVN/XFS42O
42.
DonnoD.KreftA.-K. (2019). Authoritarian institutions and women’s rights. Comparative Political Studies, 52(5), 720-753.
43.
DonnoD.NeureiterM. (2018). Can human rights conditionality reduce repression? Examining the European Union’s economic agreements. The Review of International Organizations, 13(3), 335-357.
44.
DunningT. (2004). Conditioning the effects of aid: cold war politics, donor credibility, and democracy in Africa. International Organization, 58(02), 409-423.
45.
EdgellA. B. (2017). Foreign aid, democracy, and gender quota laws. Democratization, 24(6), 1103-1141.
46.
EisensteinH. (2015). Feminism seduced: How global elites use women’s labor and ideas to exploit the world. Routledge.
47.
EnglehartN. A.MillerM. K. (2014). The CEDAW effect: international law’s impact on women’s rights. Journal of Human Rights, 13(1), 22-47.
48.
EsareyJ.DeMerittJ. H. R. (2017). Political context and the consequences of naming and shaming for human rights abuse. International Interactions, 43(4), 589-618.
49.
Escriba-FolchA.WrightJ. (2015). Foreign pressure and the politics of autocratic survival. Oxford University Press.
FinnemoreM.SikkinkK. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917.
52.
FranklinJ. C. (2008). Shame on you: The impact of human rights criticism on political repression in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly, 52, 187-211.
53.
GalS.KligmanG. (2000). The politics of gender after socialism. Princeton University Press.
54.
GandhiJ.NobleB.SvolikM. (2019). Legislatures and legislative politics in non-democracies. Comparative Political Studies.
55.
GeddesB.WrightJ.FrantzE. (2014). Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 313-331.
56.
GelbJPalleyM L (1996). Women and public policies: Reassessing gender politics. University of Virginia Press.
57.
GirodD. M. (2011). Effective foreign aid following civil war: The nonstrategic-desperation hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 188-201.
58.
GleditschP. NWallensteenPErikssonMSollenbergMStrandH (2002). Armed conflict 1946-2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 39(5), 615-637.
59.
GleditschK. S.WardM. D. (2006). Diffusion and the international context of democratization. International Organization, 60(04), 911-933.
60.
GlobermanS.ShapiroD. (2002). Global foreign direct investment flows: The role of governance infrastructure. World Development, 30(11), 1899-1919.
61.
GrayJ. (2009). International organization as a seal of approval: European Union accession and investor risk. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 931-949.
62.
GrayJ. (2013). The company states keep: International economic organizations and investor perceptions. Cambridge University Press.
63.
GrimmS.LeiningerJ. (2012). Not all good things go together: Conflicting objectives in democracy promotion. Democratization, 19(3), 391-414.
64.
GrimmS.MathisO. L. (2017). “Democratization via aid? The European Union’s democracy promotion in the Western Balkans 1994-2010. European Union Politics, 19(1), 163-184.
65.
GunitskyS. (2015). Corrupting the cyber-commons: Social media as a tool of autocratic stability. Perspectives on Politics, 13(1), 42-54.
66.
Hafner-BurtonE. M. (2008). Sticks and stones: Naming and shaming the human rights enforcement problem. International Organization, 62, 689-716.
67.
HazelzetH. (2005). Suspension of development cooperation: an instrument to promote human rights and democracy? (pp. 588-621). The European Centre for Development Policy Management.
68.
HendrixC. S.WongW. H. (2013). When is the pen truly mighty? Regime type and the efficacy of naming and shaming in curbing human rights abuses. British Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 651-672.
69.
HendrixC. S.WongW. H. (2014). Knowing your audience: How the structure of international relations and organizational choices affect amnesty international’s advocacy. The Review of International Organizations, 9, 29-58.
70.
HermesN.LensinkR. (2001). Changing the conditions for development aid: A new paradigm?Journal of Development Studies, 37(6), 1-16.
71.
HillD. W.Jr.MooreW. H.MukherjeeB. (2013). Information politics versus organizational incentives: When are amnesty international’s “naming and shaming” reports biased?International Studies Quarterly, 57, 219-232.
72.
Howard-MerriamK. (1990). Guaranteed seats for political representation of women: The Egyptian example. Women and Politics, 10(1), 17-42.
73.
HtunM. (2003). Sex and the state. Cambridge University Press.
74.
HtunM.JenseniusF. R. (2020). Violence against women legislation and changes in social norms in Mexico (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
75.
HtunM.WeldonS. L. (2012). The civic origins of progressive policy change: Combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975–2005. American Political Science Review, 106(03), 548-569.
76.
HtunM.WeldonS. L. (2015). Religious power, the state, women’s rights, and family law. Politics Gender, 11, 1-27.
77.
HtunM.WeldonS. L. (2018). The logics of gender justice: State action on women’s rights around the world. Cambridge University Press.
78.
HtunM.WeldonS. L. (2019). Gender quotas, norms, and politics. Cambridge University Press.
79.
HughesM. M.KrookM. L.PaxtonP. (2015). Transnational women’s activism and the global diffusion of gender quotas. International Studies Quarterly, 59(2), 357-372.
80.
HughesM. M.TrippA. M. (2015). Civil war and trajectories of change in women’s political representation in Africa, 1985-2010. Social Forces, 93(4), 1513-1540.
81.
HydeS. D. (2011). Catch us if you can: Election monitoring and international norm diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 356-369.
82.
HydeS. D.MarinovN. (2012). Which elections can be lost?Political Analysis, 20(2), 191-210.
83.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24.
84.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press.
85.
Kahn-NisserS. (2018). Constructive criticism: Shaming, incentives, and human rights reforms. Politics and Policy, 46, 58-83.
86.
Kahn-NisserS. (2019). When the targets are members and donors: Analyzing inter-governmental organizations’ human rights shaming. The Review of International Organizations, 14, 431-451.
87.
KalandadzeK.OrensteinM. A. (2009). Electoral protests and democratization beyond the color revolutions. Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 1403-1425.
88.
KangA. J. (2015). Bargaining for women’s rights. University of Minnesota Press.
89.
KangA. J.TrippA. M. (2018). Coalitions matter: Citizenship, women, and quota adoption in Africa. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 73-91.
90.
KarlT. L. (1986). Imposing consent: Electoralism and democratization in El Salvador. In DrakeP. W.SilvaE (Ed.) Elections and Democratization in Latin America, 1980-1985 (pp. 9-36). University of California-San Diego.
91.
KeckM.SikkinkK. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
92.
KelleyJ. G. (2017). Scorecard diplomacy. Cambridge University Press.
93.
KelleyJ. G.SimmonsB. A. (2015). Politics by number: Indicators as social pressure in international relations. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 55-70.
94.
KimaniM. (2007). Taking on violence against women in Africa: International norms, local activism start to alter laws, attitudes. Africa Renewal, 21(2), 4-7.
95.
KopsteinJ. (2006). The transatlantic divide over democracy promotion. The Washington Quarterly, 29(2), 85-98.
96.
KrainM. (2012). J’accuse! Does naming and shaming perpetrators reduce the severity of genocides or politicides?International Studies Quarterly, 56, 574-589.
97.
KreutzJ. (2015). Human rights, geostrategy, and EU foreign policy, 1989–2008. International Organization, 69(01), 195-217.
98.
KrookM. L. (2006). Reforming representation: The diffusion of candidate gender quotas worldwide. Politics Gender, 2(3), 303-327.
99.
KrookM. L. (2009). Quotas for women in politics. Oxford University Press.
100.
KrookM. L.TrueJ. (2010). Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the global promotion of gender equality. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 103-127.
101.
KrookM. L.TrueJ. (2012). Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the global promotion of gender equality. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 103-127.
102.
KubicekP. (2011). Political conditionality and European Union’s cultivation of democracy in Turkey. Democratization, 18(4), 910-931.
103.
KuntzP.ThompsonM. R. (2009). More than just the final straw: Stolen elections as revolutionary triggers. Comparative Politics, 41(3), 253-272.
104.
LebovicJ. H.VoetenE. (2009). The cost of shame: International organizations and foreign aid in the punishing of human rights violations. Journal of Peace Research, 46(1), 79-97.
105.
LevitskySWayL. A. (2003). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge University Press.
106.
LorchJ.BunkB. (2016). Gender politics, authoritarian regime resilience, and the role of civil society in Algeria and Mozambique. SSRN Electronic Journal, 292, 41.
107.
LuK.BreuningM. (2014). Gender and generosity: Does women’s representation affect development cooperation?Politics, Groups, and Identities, 2(3), 313-330.
108.
MagaloniB.ChuJ.MinE. (2013). Autocracies of the world, 1950-2012 dataset. ”Version 1.0.
109.
MansfieldE. D.SnyderJ. L. (2007). The sequencing “fallacy”. Journal of Democracy, 18(3), 5-10.
110.
McFaulM. (2004). Democracy promotion as a world value. The Washington Quarterly, 28(1), 147-163.
111.
MedieP. A. (2013). Fighting gender-based violence: The women’s movement and the enforcement of rape law in Liberia. African Affairs, 112, 377-397.
112.
MerryS. E. (2003). Constructing a global law: Violence against women and the human rights system. Law and Social Inquiry, 28(4), 941-977.
113.
MerryS. E. (2016). The seductions of quantification. University of Chicago Press.
114.
MeunierS.NicolaïdisK. (2006). The European Union as a conflicted trade power. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6), 906-925.
115.
MeyerJ. W.BoliJ.ThomasG. M.RamirezF. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144-181.
116.
MoghadamV. M. (2008). Feminism, legal reform and women’s empowerment in the Middle East and North Africa. International Social Science Journal, 59(191), 9-16.
117.
MurdieA. M.DavisD. R. (2012). Shaming and blaming: Using events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 1-16.
118.
MurdieA.PeksenD. (2015). Women’s rights INGO shaming and the government respect for women’s rights. Review of International Organizations, 10, 1-22.
119.
MuriaasR. L.WangV. (2012). Executive dominance and the politics of quota representation in Uganda. Journal of Modern African Studies, 50(2), 309-338.
120.
MwambariD. (2017). Women-led non-governmental organizations and peacebuilding in postconflict Rwanda. African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review, 7(1), 66-79.
121.
NandaV. P. (2006). The ‘good governance’ concept revisited (Vol. 603). The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences.
122.
NorrisP.FrankR. W.i ComaF. M. (2014). Advancing electoral integrity. Oxford University Press.
123.
NyabolaN. (2016). A seat at the table: The fight for gender parity in Kenya and Somalia. World Policy Journal, 33(4), 10-15.
124.
OttawayM. (2004). Don’t confuse women’s rights and democracy. New York Times.
125.
PankeD.PetersohnU. (2011). Why international norms disappear sometimes. European Journal of International Relations, 18(4), 719-742.
126.
PaxtonP.HughesM. M.GreenJ. L. (2006). The international women’s movement and women’s political representation, 1893–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(6), 898-920.
PevehouseJ. C. (2002). With a little help from my friends? Regional organizations and the consolidation of democracy. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 611.
129.
PrzeworskiA. (2009). Conquered or granted? A history of suffrage extensions. British Journal of Political Science, 39(02), 291.
130.
RamirezF. O.SoysalY.ShanahanS. (1997). The changing logic of political citizenship: Cross-national acquisition of women’s suffrage rights, 1890 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 735.
131.
RandallV.WaylenG. (1998). Gender, politics and the state. Taylor & Francis.
Reus-SmitC. (2001). Human rights and the social construction of sovereignty. Review of International Studies, 27(04), 519-538.
134.
RisseT.RoppS. C.SikkinkK. (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. Cambridge University Press.
135.
RizzoH.Abdel-LatifA.-H.MeyerK. (2007). The relationship between gender equality and democracy: A comparison of Arab versus non-Arab Muslim societies. Sociology, 41(6), 1151-1170.
136.
SalhiZ. S. (2010). The Algerian feminist movement between nationalism, patriarchy, and Islamism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33(2), 113-124.
137.
SaterJ. N. (2007). Changing politics from below? Women parliamentarians in Morocco. Democratization, 14(4), 723-742.
138.
SchimmelfennigF.SedelmeierU. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 661-679.
139.
SchuethS. (2015). Winning the rankings game: The republic of Georgia, USAID, and the doing business project. In CooleyASnyderJ (Ed.) Ranking the World (pp. 151-177). Cambridge University Press.
140.
SeligsonM. A.BoothJ. A. (1995). Elections and democracy in Central America, revisited. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
141.
ShorE. (2008). Conflict, terrorism, and the socialization of human rights norms. Social Problems, 55(1), 117-138.
142.
SimmonsB. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights. Cambridge University Press.
143.
SimmonsB. A.ElkinsZ. (2004). The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review, 98(01), 171-189.
144.
SimpserA.DonnoD. (2012). Can international election monitoring harm governance?The Journal of Politics, 74(2), 501-513.
145.
SteinE.DaudeC. (2001). Institutions, integration and the location of foreign direct investment. New horizons of foreign direct investment. Forthcoming.
146.
StroupS. S.MurdieA. (2012). There’s no place like home: explaining international NGO advocacy. The Review of International Organizations, 7, 425-448.
147.
SwissL.FallonK. M. (2017). Women’s transnational activism, norm cascades, and quota adoption in The developing world. Politics & Gender, 13(3), 458-487.
148.
SuboticJ. (2009). Hijacked justice: dealing with the past in the Balkans. Cornell University Press.
149.
TownsA. E (2012). Norms and social hierarchies: Understanding international policy diffusion “from below. International Organization, 66(02), 179-209.
150.
TremblayM. (2007). Democracy, representation, and women: A comparative analysis. Democratization, 14(4), 533-553.
151.
TrippA. M. (2013). Political systems and gender. In WayelenGCelisKKantolaJWeldonS. L (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford University Press.
152.
TrippA. M. (2019). Seeking legitimacy: Why Arab autocracies adopt women’s rights. Cambridge University Press.
153.
TrippA. M.KangA. (2008). The global impact of quotas: On the fast track to increased female legislative representation. Comparative Political Studies, 41(3), 338-361.
154.
TuckerJ. A. (2007). Enough! Electoral fraud, collective action problems, and post-communist colored revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 5(03), 535.
155.
UNDP. (2000). Women’s political participation and good governance: 21st century challenges.
156.
USAID. (2012). Gender equality and female empowerment policy.
157.
Von BorzyszkowskiI.VabulasF. (2019). Credible commitments? Explaining IGO suspensions to sanction political backsliding. International Studies Quarterly, 63(1), 139-152.
158.
VreelandJ. R. (2008). The effect of political regime on civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(3), 401-425.
159.
WangY.-T.LindenforsP.SundströmA.JanssonF.PaxtonP.LindbergS. I. (2017). Women’s rights in democratic transitions: A global sequence analysis, 1900-2012. European Journal of Political Research, 56(4), 735-756.
160.
WebsterK.ChenC.BeardsleyK. (2019). Conflict, peace and the evolution of women’s empowerment. International Organization, 73(2), 255-289.
161.
WeldonS. L. (2002). Protest, policy, and the problem of violence against women. University of Pittsburgh Press.
162.
WilliamsonS.MagaloniB. (2020). Legislatures and policy making in authoritarian regimes. Comparative Political Studies, 53(9), 1525-1543.
163.
WolffJ. (2012). Democracy promotion, empowerment, and self-determination: Conflicting objectives in US and German policies towards Bolivia. Democratization, 19(3), 415-437.
164.
WooB.MurdieA. (2017). International organizations and naming and shaming: Does the International Monetary Fund care about the human rights reputation of its client?Political Studies, 65(4), 767-785.
165.
WooB.ParkeD. (2016). Official development assistance and women’s rights. Asian Women, 32(1), 1.
166.
WrightJ. (2009). How foreign aid can foster democratization in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 552-571.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
