How do social movements sustain themselves under authoritarian rule? This remains a crucial puzzle for scholars of comparative politics. This article gains traction on this puzzle by foregrounding the generative power of protest, namely the power of protest experiences themselves to deepen and broaden movements. Some studies have started to draw attention to those questions without yet systematically examining how the form of protest differentially affects those outcomes. I argue that different forms of protest have varying effects on movements depending on their duration and geographic scope. While short, multiple-site actions, such as marches, can broaden movements by expanding their base, extended, single-site actions, such as sit-ins, are more likely to deepen movements by fostering collective identities and building organizational capacities. This article is based on field research in Egypt, Tunisia, Jordan, and Morocco and interviews with more than 100 movement participants and civil society activists.
AmentaE.CarenN. (2004). The legislative, organizational, and beneficiary consequences of state-oriented challenges. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements. Blackwell.
2.
BeininJ.VairelF. (Eds.). (2013). Social movements, mobilization, and contestation in the Middle East and North Africa (2nd ed.). Stanford University Press.
3.
BeissingerM. R. (2002). Nationalist mobilization and the collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge University Press.
4.
BennettA. (2010). Process tracing and causal inference. In BradyH. E.CollierD. (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (pp. 207–220). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
5.
BogaertK. (2015). The revolt of small towns: The meaning of Morocco’s history and the geography of social protests. Review of African Political Economy, 42(143), 124–140.
6.
BoudreauV. (2004). Resisting dictatorship: Repression and protest in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press.
7.
BrockettC. D. (1995). A protest-cycle resolution of the repression/popular-protest paradox. In TraugottM. (Ed.), Repertoires and cycles of collective action (pp. 117–144). Duke University Press.
8.
BrockettC. D. (2005). Political movements and violence in Central America. Cambridge University Press.
9.
BrookeS.KetchleyN. (2018). Social and institutional origins of political Islam. The American Political Science Review, 112(2), 376–394.
10.
CaiY. (2010). Collective resistance in China: Why popular protests succeed or fail. Stanford University Press.
11.
CareyS. C. (2009). Protest, repression and political regimes: An empirical analysis of Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Routledge.
12.
CastellsM. (1983). The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. University of California Press.
13.
ChenX. (2012). Social protest and contentious authoritarianism in China. Cambridge University Press.
14.
ConradC. R. (2011). Constrained concessions: Beneficent dictatorial responses to the domestic political opposition. International Studies Quarterly, 55(4), 1167–1187.
15.
Corrigall-BrownC. (2012). Patterns of protest: Trajectories of participation in social movements. Stanford University Press.
16.
CoxK. R. (2002). Political geography: Territory, state, and society. Blackwell.
17.
DavenportC. (Ed.). (2000). Paths to state repression: Human rights violations and contentious politics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
18.
DavenportC.JohnstonH.MuellerC. M. (2005). Repression and mobilization. University of Minnesota Press.
19.
DavenportC.MooreW. H. (2012). The Arab spring, winter, and back again? (Re)introducing the dissent-repression nexus with a twist introduction. International Interactions, 38(5), 703–713
20.
DavenportC.SouleS. A.ArmstrongD. A.II. (2011). Protesting while black? The differential policing of American activism, 1960 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 152–178.
21.
Della PortaD. (2008). Eventful protest, global conflicts. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 27–56.
22.
Della PortaD. (2018). Protests as critical junctures: Some reflections towards a momentous approach to social movements. Social Movement Studies, 19(5–6), 1–20.
23.
Della PortaD. (2016). Where did the revolution go? Contentious politics and the quality of democracy. Cambridge University Press.
24.
Della PortaD.DianiM. (2015). The Oxford handbook of social movements. Oxford University Press.
25.
Della PortaD.FabbriM.PiazzaG. (2013). Putting protest in place: Contested and liberated spaces in three campaigns. In NichollsW.BeaumontJ.MillerB. A. (Eds.), Spaces of contention: Spatialities and social movements (pp. 27–46). Ashgate.
26.
DianiM.MischeA. (2015). Network approaches and social movements. In PortaD. D.DianiM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social movements. Oxford University Press.
27.
DzenovskaD.ArenasI. (2012). Don’t fence me in: Barricade sociality and political struggles in Mexico and Latvia. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 54(3), 644–678.
28.
EarlJ. (2003). Tanks, tear gas, and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 44–68.
29.
ErrazzoukiS. (2017a). Moroccan police fire tear gas to disperse protests in north. Reuters, July20.
30.
ErrazzoukiS. (2017b). Moroccan injured during protest dies after weeks in coma. Reuters, August7.
FranciscoR. A. (2005). The dictator’s dilemma. In DavenportC.JohnstonH.MuellerC. (Eds.), Repression and mobilization (pp. 58–81). University of Minnesota Press.
33.
FrenzelF.FeigenbaumA.McCurdyP. (2014). Protest camps: An emerging field of social movement research. The Sociological Review, 62(3), 457–474.
34.
FuD. (2017). Disguised collective action in China. Comparative Political Studies, 50(4), 499–527.
35.
FuD. (2018). Mobilizing without the masses: Control and contention in China. Cambridge University Press.
36.
GamsonW. A. (1975). The strategy of social protest. Dorsey Press.
37.
GamsonW. A. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. In MorrisA. D.MuellerC. M. (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53–76). Yale University Press.
38.
GeorgeA. L.BennettA. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences (4th printing ed.). The MIT Press.
39.
GerringJ. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.
GoldstoneJ. A. (2011). Cross-class Coalitions and the Making of the Arab Revolts of 2011. Swiss Political Science Review, 17(4), 457–462.
42.
GoldstoneJ. A.TillyC. (2001). Threat (and opportunity): Popular action and state response in the dynamics of contentious action. In AminzadeR. R.GoldstoneJ. A.McAdamD.PerryE. J.Sewell Jr.W. H.TarrowS.TillyC. (Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics (pp. 179–194). Cambridge University Press.
43.
GregoryD. (2013). Tahrir: Politics, publics and performances of space. Middle East Critique, 22(3), 235–246.
44.
GunningJ.BaronI. Z. (2014). Why occupy a square? People, protests and movements in the Egyptian revolution. Oxford University Press.
45.
GurrT. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Published for the Center of International Studies, Princeton University [by] Princeton University Press.
46.
HalvorsenS. (2017). Spatial dialectics and the geography of social movements: The case of occupy London. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(3), 445–457.
47.
HammondJ. L. (2013). The significance of space in occupy Wall Street. Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements, 5(2), 499–524.
48.
HuntS. A.BenfordR. D. (2004). Collective identity, solidarity and commitment. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 433–459). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
49.
JenkinsJ. C.PerrowC. (1977). Insurgency of the powerless: Farm worker movements (1946–1972). American Sociological Review, 42(2), 249–268.
50.
JohnstonH. (2015). “The game’s afoot”: Social movements in authoritarian states. In Della PortaD.DianiM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social movements (pp. 619–633). Oxford University Press.
51.
KetchleyN. (2017). Egypt in a time of revolution: Contentious politics and the Arab spring. Cambridge University Press.
52.
KhawajaM. (1993). Repression and popular collective action: Evidence from the west bank. Sociological Forum, 8(1), 47–71.
53.
KohnM. (2013). Privatization and protest: Occupy Wall Street, occupy Toronto, and the occupation of public space in a democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 11(1), 99–110.
54.
KoopmansR. (2004). Protest in time and space: The evolution of waves of contention. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 413–432). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
55.
LachapelleJ. (2012). Lessons from Egypt’s tax collectors. Middle East Report, 264, 38–41.
56.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
57.
LeitnerH.SheppardE.SziartoK. M. (2008). The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(2), 157–172.
58.
LiY. (2019). A zero-sum game? Repression and protest in China. Government and Opposition, 54(2), 309–335.
59.
LichbachM. I. (1987). Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(2), 266–297.
60.
MarstonS. (2003). Mobilizing geography: Locating space in social movement theory. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 8(2), 227–233.
61.
MartinD.MillerB. (2003). Space and contentious politics. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 8(2), 143–156.
62.
McAdamD.SewellW. H. (2001). Temporality in the study of social movements and revolutions. In AminzadeR.GoldstoneJ. A.McAdamD.PerryE. J.SewellW. H.TarrowS.TillyC. (Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics (pp. 89–125). Cambridge University Press.
63.
McAdamD.SnowD. A. (Eds.). (1997). Social movements: Readings on their emergence, mobilization, and dynamics. Roxbury Publishing Company.
64.
McAdamD.TarrowS.TillyC. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press.
65.
McCurdyP.FeigenbaumA.FrenzelF. (2016). Protest camps and repertoires of contention. Social Movement Studies, 15(1), 97–104.
66.
MekouarM. (2016). Protest and mass mobilization: Authoritarian collapse and political change in North Africa. Routledge.
67.
MelucciA. (1989). In KeaneJ.MierP. (Eds.), Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Temple University Press.
68.
MillerB. A.NichollsW.BeaumontJ. (Eds.). (2013). Spaces of contention: Spatialities and social movements. Ashgate.
69.
MillerB.NichollsW. (2013). Social movements in urban society: The city as a space of politicization. Urban Geography, 34(4), 452–473.
70.
MischeA. (2008). Partisan publics: Communication and contention across Brazilian youth activist networks. Princeton University Press.
71.
MooreA. (2011). The eventfulness of social reproduction. Sociological Theory; Washington, 29(4), 294–314, 341.
72.
NichollsW.BeaumontJ.MillerB. A. (2013). Spaces of contention: Spatialities and social movements. Ashgate.
73.
O’BrienK. J.LiL. (2006). Rightful resistance in rural China. Cambridge University Press.
74.
O’BrienK. J. (Ed.). (2008). Popular protest in China. Harvard University Press.
75.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
76.
OlsonM. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
77.
OppK.-D. (2009). Theories of political protest and social movements: A multidisciplinary introduction, critique, and synthesis. Routledge.
78.
OppK.-D.RoehlW. (1990). Repression, micromobilization and political protest. Social Forces, 69(2), 521–547.
79.
OttawayM. (2003). Democracy challenged: The rise of semi-authoritarianism. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
80.
PearlmanW. (2013). Emotions and the Microfoundations of the Arab uprisings. Perspectives on Politics, 11(2), 387–409.
81.
PearlmanW. (2020). Mobilizing from scratch: Large-scale collective action without preexisting organization in the Syrian uprising. Comparative Political Studies, 1–32.
82.
PiersonP. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press.
83.
PinardM. (2011). Motivational dimensions in social movements and contentious collective action. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
84.
PivenF. F. (1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. Pantheon Books.
85.
RaslerK. (1996). Concessions, repression, and political protest in the Iranian revolution. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096410
86.
RisagerB. S. (2017). The eventful places of occupy Wall Street and Tahrir square: Cosmopolitan imagination and social movements. Globalizations, 14(5), 714–729.
87.
RobertsonG. B. (2009). Managing society: Protest, civil society, and regime in Putin’s Russia. Slavic Review, 68(3), 528–547.
88.
RobertsonG. B. (2011). The politics of protest in hybrid regimes: Managing dissent in post-communist Russia. Cambridge University Press.
89.
RyanC. R. (2018). Jordan and the Arab uprisings: Regime survival and politics beyond the state. Columbia University Press.
90.
SchatzE. (2009). Introduction: Ethnographic immersion and the study of politics. In SchatzE. (Ed.), Political ethnography: What immersion contributes to the study of power. University of Chicago Press.
91.
SchwedlerJ. (2012). The political geography of protest in neoliberal Jordan. Middle East Critique, 21(3), 259–270.
92.
SchwedlerJ. (2013). Spatial dynamics of the Arab uprisings. PS: Political Science and Politics, 46(2), 230–234.
SeawrightJ.GerringJ. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly; Salt Lake City, 61(2), 294–308.
95.
SewellW. H. (2001). Space in contentious politics. In AminzadeR. R.GoldstoneJ. A.McAdamD.PerryE. J.Sewell Jr.W. H.TarrowS.TillyC. (Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics (pp. 51–88). Cambridge University Press.
96.
StaggenborgS. (2016). Social movements (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
97.
TarrowS. (2008). Charles Tilly and the practice of contentious politics. Social Movement Studies, 7(3), 225–246.
98.
TarrowS. G. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
99.
TarrowS. G. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (Rev. & updated 3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
100.
TaylorV.Van DykeN. (2004). “Get up, stand up”: Tactical repertoires of social movements. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 262–293). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
101.
TillyC. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
102.
TillyC. (2000). Spaces of contention. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5(2), 135–159.
103.
TillyC. (2003). Contention over space and place. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 8(2), 221–225.
104.
TillyC. (2006). Regimes and repertoires. University of Chicago Press.
105.
TillyC. (2008). Contentious performances. Cambridge University Press.
106.
TillyC.TarrowS. (2015). Contentious politics. (Second edition, fully revised and updated). Oxford University Press.
107.
TraugottM. (Ed.). (1995). Repertoires and cycles of collective action. Duke University Press.
108.
TraugottM. (2010). The insurgent barricade. University of California Press.
109.
TrejoG. (2012). Popular movements in autocracies: Religion, repression, and indigenous collective action in Mexico. Cambridge University Press.
110.
WangX.YeY.ChanC. K. (2019). Space in a social movement: A case study of occupy central in Hong Kong in 2014. Space and Culture, 22(4), 434–448.
111.
WickhamC. R. (2002). Mobilizing Islam: Religion, activism, and political change in Egypt. Columbia University Press.
112.
WoodE. J. (2001). The emotional benefits of insurgency in El Salvador. In GoodwinJ.JasperJ. M.PollettaF. (Eds.), Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements (pp. 267–281). University of Chicago Press.
113.
WrightT. (2001). The perils of protest: State repression and student activism in China and Taiwan. University of Hawai’i Press.
114.
WrightT. (2018). Popular protest in China (1st ed.). Polity.
YanowD. (2014). Thinking interpretively: Philosophical presuppositions and the human sciences. In YanowD.Schwartz-SheaP. (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (2nd ed., pp. 5–26). M.E. Sharp, Inc.
117.
ZimmermanE. (1980). Macro-comparative research on political protest. In GurrT. R. (Ed.), Handbook of political conflict: Theory and research. Free Press.
118.
Al-ArabiH. (2016). Nidal al-mar’a al-manjimi min khilal ahdath al-manjimi (bi-gafsa). tunis (January 2008) [The struggle of the Mining Basin Woman through the mining basin events (in Gafsa), Tunisia (January 2008)]. Insaniyat Revue Algerienne d’anthropologie et de science sociales, October–December, p. 44. https://insaniyat.crasc.dz/pdfs/ins_74_houda_larbi_ar.pdf
119.
Al-ArusiM. (2008). Ahdath al-hawd al-manjimi: sakata qatilan. . .fa ila mata yatawasal al-nisyan? (Mining basin events: Two died. . .until when forgetfulness continues?). al-tariq al-jadid, May 24 to 30.
120.
AmrusiyyaA. (2019). Min Intifadat al-hawd al-manjimi ila ala al-thawra: majmu‘at maqalat wa nusus (From the mining basin uprising to the revolution: A selection of articles and texts). Al-thaqafiyya li al-tiba‘a wa al-nashr wa al-tawzi.
AzuzM. (2010). ‘5 waqafāt ihtijājiyya amām majlis al-sha‘ab wa al-wuzarā’ wa ‘ummāl tanta li al-kittān yuwasilūn i‘tisamihim,’ (5 demonstrations in front of the people’s assembly and the cabinet; Tanta Linen workers continue their sit-in). al-Masry al-Youm, February15. www.almasryalyoum.com/node/16518
123.
AzuzM.Abdul RāzikM. (2007). ‘Asharat alāf muwazaf bil darā’ib al-‘aqāriyya ya‘tasimūn amām majlis al-wuzarā’ (Tens of thousands of real estate tax employees sit-in in front of the cabinet). al-Masry al-Youm, December4.
124.
QwaydarU. (2008). al-Redeyef: masira jadida wa iqafat (al-Redeyef: A new March and Arrests). al-tariq al-jadid, August2–8, p. 5.
125.
UwaydaJ. (2008). Malhamat i’tisam muwazzafi al-dara’ib al-’aqariyya (The epic story of the sit-in of real estate tax employees). Markaz al-Dirasat al-Ishtirakiyya. http://revsoc.me/our-publications/27888/
Taqrir qanat al-Jazeera ‘an i‘tisam muwwazafī al-darā’ib al-‘aqāriyya (Jazeera station report on sit-in of real estate tax employees). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5qwyOWOB_Q
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
