Scholars have long viewed the middle class as an agent of democratization. This article provides the first rigorous cross-national analysis of middle class regime preferences, systematically investigating the importance of an authoritarian state’s economic relationship with the middle class. Using detailed survey data on individual employment histories from 27 post-communist countries, I show that, under autocracy, state-sector careers diminish support for democracy, especially among middle class professionals. The results are robust to changes in the measurement of both the middle class and democracy support. I also show that neither selection nor response bias, redistributive preferences, communist socialization, or transition experiences can explain the results. The findings imply that a state-supported middle class may, in fact, delay democratization.
AcemogluD.RobinsonJ. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
2.
AnsellB.SamuelsD. (2008). Inequality and democratization. Paper presented at the 2008 meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
3.
AnsellB. W.SamuelsD. J. (2014). Inequality and democratization: An elite-competition approach. Cambridge University Press.
4.
BanerjeeA. V.DufloE. (2008). What is middle class about the middle classes around the world?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 3–28.
5.
BeharA.MokJ. (2015). Does public employment reduce unemployment?Topics in Middle Eastern and African Economies, 17(2), 111–121.
6.
BeissingerM. (2013). The semblance of democratic revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. American Political Science Review, 107(3), 574–592.
7.
BeissingerM.KotkinS. (Eds.). (2014). Historical legacies of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge University Press.
8.
BellinE. R. (2002). Stalled democracy: Capital, labor, and the paradox of state-sponsored development. Cornell University Press.
9.
BoixC. (2003). Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge University Press.
10.
BrownD.JonesD. M. (1995). Democratization and the myth of the liberalizing middle classes. In BellD. A.BrownD.JayasuriyaK.JonesD. M. (Eds.), Towards illiberal democracy in Pacific Asia (pp. 78–106). Macmillan.
11.
ChenJ. (2013). A middle class without democracy: Economic growth and the prospects for democratization in China. Oxford University Press.
12.
CollierR. B.CollierD. (2002). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. University of Notre Dame Press.
13.
DahlumS.KnutsenC. H.WigT. (2019). Who revolts? Empirically revisiting the social origins of democracy. The Journal of Politics, 81(4), 1494–1499.
14.
DaltonR. J.ShinD. C.JouW. (2008). How people understand democracy. In DiamondL.PlattnerM. (Eds.), How people view democracy (pp. 1–30). Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
DuchR. M. (1993). Tolerating economic reform: Popular support for transition to a free market in the former Soviet Union. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 590–608.
16.
EasterlyW. (2001). The middle class consensus and economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 6(4), 317–335.
17.
FinifterA. W.MickiewiczE. (1992). Redefining the political system of the USSR: Mass support for political change. American Political Science Review, 86(4), 857–874.
18.
FryeT. (2003). Markets, democracy, and new private business in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 19(1), 25–45.
19.
FryeT. (2006). Ownership, voting, and job creation in Russia. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(2), 452–471.
20.
FukuyamaF. (2014). Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
21.
Gans-MorseJ.KalginA. S.KlimenkoA. V.YakovlevA. A. (2017). Motivations for public service in corrupt states: Evidence from post-Soviet Russia (Working Paper No. WP BRP 13/PSP/2017). National Research University Higher School of Economics. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3072181
22.
GibsonJ. L. (1996). Political and economic markets: Changes in the connections between attitudes toward political democracy and a market economy within the mass culture of Russia and Ukraine. Journal of Politics, 58(4), 954–984.
23.
GontmakherY.RossC. (2015). The middle class and democratisation in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 67(2), 269–284.
24.
GreeneK. F. (2010). The political economy of authoritarian single-party dominance. Comparative Political Studies, 43(7), 807–834.
25.
HanmerM. J.KalkanK. O. (2013). Behind the curve: Clarifying the best approach to calculating predicted probabilities and marginal effects from limited dependent variable models. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 263–277.
26.
HoughJ. F. (1994). The Russian election of 1993: Public attitudes toward economic reform and democratization. Post-Soviet Affairs, 10(1), 1–37.
27.
JacksonJ. E.KlichJ.PoznanskaK. (2005). The political economy of Poland’s transition: New firms and reform governments. Cambridge University Press.
28.
JonesD. M. (1998). Democratization, civil society, and illiberal middle class culture in Pacific Asia. Comparative Politics, 30(2), 147–169.
29.
KarakocE. (2018). Inequality after the transition: Political parties, party systems, and social policy in southern and postcommunist Europe. Oxford University Press.
30.
KitscheltH.MansfeldovaZ.MarkowskiR.TokaG. (1999). Post-communist party systems: Competition, representation, and inter-party collaboration. Cambridge University Press.
31.
LipsetS. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.
32.
MachB. W.JacksonJ. E. (2006). Employment change, attitude evolution and voting during Poland’s transition: Longitudinal evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(2), 472–502.
33.
MalevaT.OvcharovaL. (2008). Rossijskie srednie klassy: nakanune i na pike ekonomicheskogo rosta. In ShastitkoA. E.ShastitkoS. B.AbdashevaM. A.OvchinikoT. M.MalevaT. M.OvcharovaL. N. (Eds.), Rossijskie srednie klassy: nakanune i na pike ekonomicheskogo rosta (pp. 7–102). Ekon-Inform.
34.
MarxP. (2011). The unequal incidence of non-standard employment across occupational groups (IZA Discussion Papers, No. 5521). Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201104113948
35.
McIntoshM. E.MacIverM. A.AbeleD. G.SmeltzD. (1994). Publics meet market democracy in Central and East Europe, 1991–1993. Slavic Review, 53(2), 483–512.
36.
McMannK. M. (2006). Economic autonomy and democracy: Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge University Press.
37.
MillerA. H.HesliV. L.ReisingerW. M. (1994). Reassessing mass support for political and economic change in the former USSR. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 399–411.
38.
MooreB. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Beacon Press.
39.
MunckG. L.VerkuilenJ. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5–34.
40.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
41.
Pop-ElechesG. (2007). Historical legacies and post-communist regime change. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 908–926.
42.
Pop-ElechesG.TuckerJ. A. (2017). Communism’s shadow: Historical legacies and contemporary political attitudes. Princeton University Press.
43.
PrzeworskiA. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
44.
RavallionM. (2010). The developing world’s bulging (but vulnerable) middle class. World Development, 38(4), 445–454.
45.
RechelB.RichardsonE.McKeeM. (Eds.). (2014). Trends in health systems in the former Soviet countries. World Health Organization.
46.
RemingtonT. (2011). The Russian middle class as policy objective. Post-Soviet Affairs, 27(2), 97–120.
47.
RichterK. (2006). Wage arrears and economic voting in Russia. American Political Science Review, 100(1), 133–145.
48.
RosenfeldB. (2017). Reevaluating the middle class protest paradigm: A case-control study of democratic protest coalitions in Russia. American Political Science Review, 111(4), 637–652.
49.
RosenfeldB.ImaiK.ShapiroJ. N. (2016). An empirical validation study of popular survey methodologies for sensitive questions. American Journal of Political Science, 60(3), 783–802.
50.
SharuninaA. V. (2013). Iavliaetsia li rossijskij “budzhetnik” “neudachnikom”? Analiz mezhsektornykh razlichij v oplate truda. Ekonomicheskij Zhurnal, 17(1), 75–107.
51.
ShevtsovaL. (2012). Implosion, atrophy, or revolution?Journal of Democracy, 23(3), 19–32.
TsaiK. S. (2005). Capitalists without a class: Political diversity among private entrepreneurs in China. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1130–1158.
54.
TuckerJ. A.PacekA. C.BerinskyA. J. (2002). Transitional winners and losers: Attitudes toward EU membership in post-communist countries. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 557–571.
55.
WelzelC.InglehartR. (2008). The role of ordinary people in democratization. Journal of Democracy, 19(1), 126–140.
56.
WeylandK. (2004). Neoliberalism and democracy in Latin America: A mixed record. Latin American Politics and Society, 46(1), 135–157.
57.
YangD. D. (2007). Classing ethnicity: Class, ethnicity, and the mass politics of Taiwan’s democratic transition. World Politics, 59(4), 503–538.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
