How can governments in low-trust settings overcome their credibility deficit when promoting public welfare? To answer this question, we evaluate the effectiveness of the Liberian government’s door-to-door canvassing campaign during the 2014–2015 Ebola epidemic, which aimed to persuade residents to voluntarily comply with policies for containing the disease. Combining data from an original representative survey of Monrovia during the crisis with variation in the campaign’s reach and using multiple identification strategies, we find that the informational campaign was remarkably effective at increasing adherence to safety precautions, support for contentious control policies, and general trust in government. To uncover the pathways through which the campaign proved so effective, we conducted over 80 in-depth qualitative interviews in 40 randomly sampled communities. This investigation suggests that local intermediaries were effective because their embeddedness in communities subjected them to monitoring and sanctioning, thereby assuring their fellow residents that they were accountable and thus credible.
AbdulazeezM. A. (2016). The inadequacies of exclusive military action: Countering Boko Haram’s terrorism with alternative approaches. In AbdulazeezM. A. (Ed.), Selected papers Terrorism Experts Conference (TEC) (pp. 26–58). https://html2-f.scribdassets.com/5olegg35vk61vypl/images/1-8aad2481b9.jpg
2.
AltJ. E.MarshallJ.LassenD. D. (2016). Credible sources and sophisticated voters: When does new information induce economic voting?The Journal of Politics, 78(2), 327–342.
3.
AuerbachA. M.ThachilT. (2018). How clients select brokers: Competition and choice in India’s slums. American Political Science Review, 112(4), 775–791.
4.
BagcchiS. (2015). India tackles lymphatic filariasis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 15(4), 380.
5.
BaronD. P. (2006). Persistent media bias. Journal of Public Economics, 90(1–2), 1–36.
6.
BerinskyA. J. (2007). Assuming the costs of war: Events, elites, and American public support for military conflict. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 975–997.
7.
BerinskyA. J. (2017). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241–262.
8.
BlairR. A.KarimS. M.MorseB. S. (2019). Establishing the rule of law in weak and war-torn states: Evidence from a field experiment with the Liberian National Police. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 641–657.
9.
BlairR. A.MorseB. S.TsaiL. L. (2017). Public health and public trust: Survey evidence from the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic in Liberia. Social Science & Medicine, 172, 89–97.
10.
BoteroS.CornejoR. C.GamboaL.PavaoN.NickersonD. W. (2015). Says who? An experiment on allegations of corruption and credibility of sources. Political Research Quarterly, 68(3), 493–504.
ChongD.DruckmanJ. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118.
15.
ClingingsmithD.KhwajaA. I.KremerM. (2009). Estimating the impact of the Hajj: Religion and tolerance in Islam’s global gathering. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1133–1170.
16.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
17.
ConeJ.FlahartyK.FergusonM. J. (2019). Believability of evidence matters for correcting social impressions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(20), 9802–9807.
18.
CrelinstenR. D. (1987). Terrorism as political communication: The relationship between the controller and the controlled. In WilkinsonP.StewartA. M. (Eds.), Contemporary research on terrorism (pp. 3–23). Aberdeen University Press.
19.
DennisA. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in small group decision making. Small Group Research, 27(4), 532–550.
20.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. HarperCollins.
21.
EllisS. (1999). The mask of anarchy: The destruction of Liberia and the religious dimension of an African civil war. New York University Press.
22.
El-ShinnawyM.VinzeA. S. (1997). Technology, culture and persuasiveness: A study of choice-shifts in group settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(3), 473–496.
23.
EnosR. D.HershE. D. (2015). Party activists as campaign advertisers: The ground campaign as a principal-agent problem. American Political Science Review, 109(2), 252–278.
FaasseK.GambleG.CundyT.PetrieK. J. (2012). Impact of television coverage on the number and type of symptoms reported during a health scare: A retrospective pre–post observational study. BMJ Open, 2(4), e001607.
26.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
27.
GerberA. S.GreenD. P. (1999). Misperceptions about perceptual bias. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 189–210.
28.
GerberA. S.GreenD. P. (2000). The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 653–663.
29.
GilensM.MurakawaN. (2002). Elite cues and political decision-making. Research in Micropolitics, 6, 15–49.
30.
GreenD. P.GerberA. S.NickersonD. W. (2003). Getting out the vote in local elections: Results from six door-to-door canvassing experiments. The Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1083–1096.
31.
GrossmanS.PhillipsJ.RosenzweigL. R. (2018). Opportunistic accountability: State–society bargaining over shared interests. Comparative Political Studies, 51, 979–1011.
32.
HardinR. (1998). Trust in government. In BraithwaiteV.LeviM. (Eds.), Trust & governance (pp. 9–27). Russell Sage Foundation.
33.
HershE. D. (2015). Hacking the electorate: How campaigns perceive voters. Cambridge University Press.
34.
HillygusD. S.ShieldsT. G. (2008). The persuadable voter: Wedge issues in presidential campaigns. Princeton University Press.
HirschA. V. (2016). Experimentation and persuasion in political organizations. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 68–84.
37.
HortenG. (2003). Radio goes to war: The cultural politics of propaganda during World War II. University of California Press.
38.
HovlandC. I.WeissW. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650.
39.
HuckfeldtR. R.SpragueJ. (1995). Citizens, politics and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge University Press.
40.
HuqA. Z.TylerT. R.SchulhoferS. J. (2011). Why does the public cooperate with law enforcement? The influence of the purposes and targets of policing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(3), 419–450.
JostJ. T.KayA. C.ThorisdottirH. (2009). Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. Oxford University Press.
43.
KarlanD.MobiusM.RosenblatT.SzeidlA. (2009). Trust and social collateral. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1307–1361.
44.
KatzE. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1), 61–78.
45.
KatzE.LazarsfeldP. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. Transaction Publishers.
46.
KeeferP. (2007). Clientelism, credibility, and the policy choices of young democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 804–821.
47.
KrishnaA. (2011). Gaining access to public services and the democratic state in India: Institutions in the middle. Studies in Comparative International Development, 46(1), 98–117.
48.
Kruks-WisnerG. (2018). Claiming the state: Active citizenship and social welfare in rural India. Cambridge University Press.
49.
KumkaleG. T.AlbarracínD.SeignourelP. J. (2010). The effects of source credibility in the presence or absence of prior attitudes: Implications for the design of persuasive communication campaigns. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(6), 1325–1356.
50.
KundaZ. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 636–647.
51.
LupiaA.McCubbinsM. D.ArthurL. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?Cambridge University Press.
MasonB. W.DonnellyP. (2000). Impact of a local newspaper campaign on the uptake of the measles mumps and rubella vaccine. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54(6), 473–474.
54.
MazerolleL.AntrobusE.BennettS.TylerT. R. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51(1), 33–63.
MiddletonJ. A.GreenD. P. (2008). Do community-based voter mobilization campaigns work even in battleground states? Evaluating the effectiveness of MoveOn’s 2004 outreach campaign. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3, 63–82.
NisbetM. C.KotcherJ. E. (2009). A two-step flow of influence? Opinion-leader campaigns on climate change. Science Communication, 30(3), 328–354.
59.
NyhanB.ReiflerJ.RicheyS.FreedG. L. (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 133(4), e835–e842.
60.
OsterE. (2019). Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 37(2), 187–204.
61.
OstromE. (2015). Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press.
62.
PetitD.SondorpE.MayhewS.RouraM.RobertsB. (2013). Implementing a Basic Package of Health Services in post-conflict Liberia: Perceptions of key stakeholders. Social Science & Medicine, 78, 42–49.
63.
PornpitakpanC. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281.
64.
PutnamR. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
65.
RainsS. A. (2007). The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research, 34(1), 100–125.
SchmidA. P.de GraafJ. (1982). Violence as communication: Insurgent terrorism and the Western news media. SAGE.
68.
ScottJ. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
69.
SeligsonM. A. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. The Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408–433.
70.
ShilueJ. S.FagenP. (2014). Liberia: Links between peacebuilding, conflict prevention and durable solutions to displacement. Brookings Institution Press.
71.
SpenceM. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
72.
SternthalB.DholakiaR.LeavittC. (1978). The persuasive effect of source credibility: Tests of cognitive response. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 252–260.
StokesS. C.DunningT.NazarenoM.BruscoV. (2013). Brokers, voters, and clientelism: The puzzle of distributive politics. Cambridge University Press.
75.
TormalaZ. L.BriñolP.PettyR. E. (2006). When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 684–691.
76.
TreismanD. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211–244.
77.
TylerT. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84–99.
VarshneyA. (2003). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. Yale University Press.
80.
Weitz-ShapiroR.WintersM. S. (2017). Can citizens discern? Information credibility, political sophistication, and the punishment of corruption in Brazil. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 60–74.
81.
WillerR. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 23–43.
82.
WilliamsJ. C. (2008). Counterinsurgency meets soft power an alternative approach to deterring terrorist recruitment in Mindanao [Doctoral dissertation]. Naval Postgraduate School.
83.
WislerD.OnwudiweI. D. (2008). Community policing in comparison. Police Quarterly, 11(4), 427–446.
ZakariaN.MustaffaC. S. (2014). Source credibility, risk communication and well-being: A conceptual framework. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 178–188.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
