We examine the individual-level determinants of tax morale in low-capacity states, specifically Latin American countries, where the social contract is often perceived as fractured. We argue that individuals in such states perceive the social contract as an agreement to which they can opt in or opt out. Those who choose to opt out prefer to substitute state-provided goods for private providers, rather than pay for public goods through taxes or free ride to receive those goods. Through a list experiment conducted in Mexico City, we demonstrate that willingness to evade taxes is highest when individuals have stepped outside of the social contract. More traditional indicators of reciprocity—such as socioeconomic status and perceptions of corruption—are not significant. We bolster our experimental results with observational data from 17 Latin American cities; those with access to employer-sponsored insurance are more willing to evade tax.
AhlquistJ. S. (2018). List experiment design, non-strategic respondent error, and item count technique estimators. Political Analysis, 26, 34-53.
3.
AlcarazC.ChiquiarD.SalcedoA. (2015). Informality and segmentation in the Mexican labor market (Technical report, working papers). Mexico City, Mexico: Banco de México.
4.
AllinghamM. G.SandmoA. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323-338.
5.
ArdanazM.ScartasciniC. (2013). Inequality and personal income taxation: The origins and effects of legislative malapportionment. Comparative Political Studies, 46, 1636-1663.
6.
Ballard-RosaC.MartinL.ScheveK. (2017). The structure of American income tax policy preferences. The Journal of Politics, 79, 1-16.
7.
BeramendiP.RehmP. (2016). Who gives, who gains? Progressivity and preferences. Comparative Political Studies, 49, 529-563.
8.
BergmanM. (2010). Tax evasion and the rule of law in Latin America: The political culture of cheating and compliance in Argentina and Chile. University Park: Penn State University Press.
9.
BirdR. M.ZoltE. M. (2015). Fiscal contracting in Latin America. World Development, 67, 323-335.
10.
BlairG.ChouW.ImaiK. (2018). List experiments with measurement error (Technical report). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. Retrieved from https://imai.princeton.edu
11.
BlairG.ImaiK. (2012). Statistical analysis of list experiments. Political Analysis, 20, 47-77.
12.
BodeaC.LeBasA. (2016). The origins of voluntary compliance: Attitudes toward taxation in urban Nigeria. British Journal of Political Science, 46, 215-238.
13.
BradburnN. M.SudmanS.BlairE.StockingC. (1978). Question threat and response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 221-234.
14.
BrooksS. (2009). Social protection and the market in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
CastañedaN. (2017). Business coordination and tax politics. Political Studies, 65, 122-143.
17.
CastañedaN.DoyleD. (2019). Progressive tax policy and informal labor in developing economies. Governance, 32, 595-618. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12390
18.
CastroL.ScartasciniC. (2015). Tax compliance and enforcement in the Pampas evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 65-82.
19.
CentenoM. A. (1997). Blood and debt: War and taxation in nineteenth-century Latin America. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1565-1605.
20.
Corporación Andina de Fomento. (2012). Public finance for development: Strengthening the connection between income and expenditure. Caracas, Venezuela: Andean Development Corporation.
21.
CotlearD.Gómez-DantésO.KnaulF.AtunR.BarretoI. C.CetrángoloO.. . . LozanoR. (2015). Overcoming social segregation in health care in Latin America. The Lancet, 385, 1248-1259.
22.
CowellF. A.GordonJ. P. (1988). Unwillingness to pay: Tax evasion and public good provision. Journal of Public Economics, 36, 305-321.
23.
CullenJ. B.TurnerN.WashingtonE. L. (2018). Political alignment, attitudes toward government and tax evasion (Technical report No. 24323). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.
DaudeC.GutierrezH.MelguizoA. (2013). What drives tax morale? A focus on emerging economies. Review of Public Economics, 207(4), 9-40.
25.
De JongeC. P. K.NickersonD. W. (2014). Artificial inflation or deflation? Assessing the item count technique in comparative surveys. Political Behavior, 36, 659-682.
DwengerN.KlevenH.RasulI.RinckeJ. (2016). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations for tax compliance: Evidence from a field experiment in Germany. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8, 203-232.
30.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (2017). Fiscal panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean 2017: Mobilizing resources to finance sustainable development. Santiago, Chile: Author.
31.
FairfieldT. (2015). Private wealth and public revenue in Latin America: Business power and tax politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
FehrE.GächterS. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 159-181.
FerreiraF. H.MessinaJ.RigoliniJ.López-CalvaL.-F.LugoM. A.VakisR.LóL. F. (2012). Economic mobility and the rise of the Latin American middle class. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
35.
FischbacherU.GachterS. (2010). Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. The American Economic Review, 100, 541-556.
36.
Flores-MacíasG. A. (2014). Financing security through elite taxation: The case of Colombia’s democratic security taxes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 49, 477-500.
37.
Flores-MacíasG. A. (2018). Building support for taxation in developing countries: Experimental evidence from Mexico. World Development, 105, 13-24.
GlynnA. N. (2013). What can we learn with statistical truth serum? Design and analysis of the list experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77, 159-172.
42.
Gómez SabainiJ. C.JiménezJ. P. (2012). Tax structure and tax evasion in Latin America. Santiago, Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.
43.
HartA. (2010). Death of the partisan? Globalization and taxation in South America, 1990-2006. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 304-328.
44.
ImaiK. (2011). Multivariate regression analysis for the item count technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106, 407-416.
45.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía [National Institute of Statistics and Geography]. (2010). Censo de población y vivienda 2010 [Census of Population and Housing 2010]. Retrieved from https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ccpv/2010/
Kiewiet de JongeC.NickersonD. (2014). Artificial inflation or deflation? Assessing the item count technique in comparative surveys. Political Behavior, 36, 659-682.
48.
KurtzM. J. (2013). Latin American state building in comparative perspective: Social foundations of institutional order. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
KuziemkoI.NortonM. I.SaezE.StantchevaS. (2015). How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. The American Economic Review, 105, 1478-1508.
50.
LeviM. (1989). Of rule and revenue (Vol. 13). Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
LuttmerE.SinghalM. (2014). Tax morale. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28, 149-168.
McGuireJ. W. (2014). Causes, characteristics, and consequences? In KingstoneP.YasharD. J. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Latin American politics (p. 200). New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
O’DonnellG. (1993). On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some post-communist countries. World Development, 21, 1355-1369.
55.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). OECD reviews of health systems: Mexico 2016. Paris, France: Author.
56.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Revenue statistics in Latin America and the Caribbean 2019. Paris, France: Author.
57.
OrtegaD.RonconiL.SanguinettiP. (2016). Reciprocity and willingness to pay taxes: Evidence from a survey experiment in Latin America. Economía, 16, 55-87.
58.
PalerL. (2013). Keeping the public purse: An experiment in windfalls, taxes, and the incentives to restrain government. American Political Science Review, 107, 706-725.
59.
RomeroV.ParasP.ZechmeisterE. (2015). Cultura política de la democracia en Mexico y en las Américas, 2014: Gobernabilidad democrática a través de 10 años del Barómetro de las Américas [Political Culture and Democracy in Mexico and the Americas 2014]. Mexico City, Mexico: Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México.
60.
RonconiL.ZarazagaR. (2015). Labor exclusion and the erosion of citizenship responsibilities. World Development, 74, 453-461.
61.
RosenfeldB.ImaiK.ShapiroJ. N. (2016). An empirical validation study of popular survey methodologies for sensitive questions. American Journal of Political Science, 60, 783-802.
62.
RousseauJ.-J. (1920). The social contract and discourses (Number 660). Darlington, UK: J. M. Dent.
63.
RuedaD.StegmuellerD. (2016). The externalities of inequality: Fear of crime and preferences for redistribution in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 60, 472-489.
ScheveK.StasavageD. (2016). Taxing the rich: A history of fiscal fairness in the United States and Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
SchneiderB. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67.
Segura-UbiergoA. (2007). The political economy of the welfare state in Latin America: Globalization, democracy, and development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
SlemrodJ. (2018). Tax compliance and enforcement (NBER Working Paper Series No. 24799). Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w24799
69.
SoiferH. D. (2015). State building in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70.
TillyC. (1992). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1992. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
71.
TorglerB. (2005). Tax morale in Latin America. Public Choice, 122, 133-157.
72.
WibbelsE.AhlquistJ. S. (2011). Development, trade, and social insurance. International Studies Quarterly, 55, 125-149.
73.
WibbelsE.ArceM. (2003). Globalization, taxation, and burden-shifting in Latin America. International Organization, 57, 111-136.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
