We present a temporally fine-grained data set on regimes, defined as the formal and informal rules essential for selecting leaders. The data set comprises more than 2,000 regimes from 197 polities, 1789 to 2016. We highlight how the frequency of breakdowns and particular modes of breakdown have followed cyclical rather than monotonic patterns across modern history. The most common breakdown modes, overall, are coups and incumbent-guided regime transformations. Furthermore, we report robust evidence that low income, slow or negative growth, and intermediate levels of democracy predict a higher likelihood of regime breakdown. Yet, by running change-point analysis we establish that breakdown risk has cycled substantively across periods of modern history, and the aforementioned explanatory factors are more clearly related to breakdown during certain periods. When disaggregating different breakdown modes, low income is related to, for example, breakdown due to popular uprisings, whereas intermediate democracy levels clearly predict coup-induced breakdowns and incumbent-guided transitions.
AbrahamianE. (2013). The coup: 1953, the CIA, and the roots of modern US-Iranian relations. New York, NY: New Press.
2.
AcemogluD. (2008). Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
AcemogluD.RobinsonJ. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AidtT. S.JensenP. S. (2014). Workers of the world, unite! Franchise extensions and the threat of revolution in Europe, 1820-1938. European Economic Review, 72, 52-75.
5.
AidtT. S.LeonG. (2016). The democratic window of opportunity: Evidence from riots in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 60, 694-717.
6.
AnsellB. W.SamuelsD. J. (2014). Inequality and democratization: An elite-competition approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BeckN.KatzJ. N. (2001). Throwing out the baby with the bath water: A comment on green, Kim, and Yoon. International Organization, 55187-55195.
8.
BodeaC.ElbadawiI.HouleC. (2017). Do civil wars, coups and riots have the same structural determinants?International Interactions, 43, 537-561.
9.
BoixC. (2003). Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BoixC. (2011). Democracy, development, and the international system. American Political Science Review, 105, 809-828.
11.
BoixC.MillerM.RosatoS. (2013). A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comparative Political Studies, 46, 1523-1554.
12.
BoixC.SvolikM. W. (2013). The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions, commitment, and power-sharing in dictatorships. Journal of Politics, 75, 300-316.
13.
BrattonM.van de WalleN. (1997). Democratic experiments in Africa: Regime transitions in comparative perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Bueno de MesquitaB.SiversonR. M.WollerG. (1992). War and the fate of regimes: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 86, 638-646.
15.
AndrijaševićŽ. M.RastoderŠ. (2006). The history of Montenegro: From ancient times to 2003. Podgorica: Montenegro Diaspora Centre.
16.
CarterD. B.SignorinoC. S. (2010). Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis, 18, 271-292.
17.
CheibubJ.GandhiJ.VreelandJ. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143, 67-101.
18.
ChenowethE.StephanM. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
19.
ChibS. (1998). Estimation and comparison of multiple change-point models. Journal of Econometrics, 86, 221-241.
20.
CicconeA. (2011). Economic shocks and civil conflict: A comment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3, 215-227.
21.
CoppedgeM. (2012). Democratization and research methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
CoppedgeM.GerringJ.LindbergS.SkaaningS. E.TeorellJ.AltmanD.. . . WilsonS. (2017). “Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Dataset v7.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
23.
DaviesJ. C. (1962). Towards a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review, 27, 5-19.
24.
FarissC. J.CrabtreeC. D.AndersT.JonesZ. M.LinderF. J.MarkowitzJ. N. (2017). Latent estimation of GDP, GDP per capita, and population from historic and contemporary sources (Working paper). Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.01099.pdf
GandhiJ. (2008). Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GandhiJ.Lust-OkarE. (2009). Elections under authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 403-422.
28.
GasiorowskiM. J. (1987). The 1953 coup d’etat in Iran. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 19, 261-286.
29.
GasiorowskiM. J.ByrneM. (2004). Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 coup in Iran. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
30.
GassebnerM.GutmannJ.VoigtS. (2016). When to expect a coup détat? An extreme bounds analysis of coup determinants. Public Choice, 169, 293-313.
31.
GatesS.HegreH.JonesM. P.StrandH. (2006). Institutional inconsistency and political instability: Polity duration, 1800–2000. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 893-908.
32.
GeddesB. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years?Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 115-144.
33.
GeddesB.WrightJ.FrantzE. (2014). Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set. Perspectives on Politics, 12, 313-331.
34.
GoemansH.GleditschK. S.ChiozzaG. (2009). Introducing Archigos: A dataset of political leader. Journal of Peace Research, 46, 269-283.
35.
GoldstoneJ. A.BatesR. H.EpsteinD. L.GurrT. R.LustikM. B.MarshallM. G.WoodwardM. (2010). A global model for forecasting political instability. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 190-208.
36.
GurrT. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
HadeniusA.TeorellJ. (2007). Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 18, 143-156.
38.
HegreH.EllingsenT.GatesS.GleditschN. P. (2001). Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816–1992. American Political Science Review, 95, 33-48.
39.
HegreH.SambanisN. (2006). Sensitivity analysis of empirical results on civil war onset. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 508-535.
40.
HochstetlerK.EdwardsM. E. (2009). Failed presidencies: Identifying and explaining a South American anomaly. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 1, 31-57.
41.
HochstetlerK.SamuelsD. (2011). Crisis and rapid reequilibration: The consequences of presidential challenge and failure in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 43, 127-145.
42.
HudsonR. A.HanrattyD. M. (1991). Bolivia, a country study. Washington, DC: Research Division, Library of Congress.
43.
HuntingtonS. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
44.
Kendall-TaylorA.FrantzE. (2014). How autocracies fall. The Washington Quarterly, 37, 35-47.
45.
KennedyR. (2010). The contradiction of modernization: A conditional model of endogenous democratization. The Journal of Politics, 72, 785-798.
46.
KnutsenC. H. (2014). Income growth and revolutions. Social Science Quarterly, 95, 921-937.
47.
KnutsenC. H.NygårdH. M. (2015). Institutional characteristics and regime survival: Why are semi-democracies less durable than autocracies and democracies?American Journal of Political Science, 59, 656-670.
48.
KnutsenC. H.TeorellJ.CornellA.GerringJ.Gjerløw. . . SeimB. (2019). Introducing the historical Varieties Of Democracy dataset: Political institutions in the long 19th century. Journal of Peace Research, 56, 440-451.
49.
KokkonenA.SundellA. (2014). Delivering stability—Primogeniture and autocratic survival in European monarchies 1000-1800. American Political Science Review, 108, 438-453.
50.
KuranT. (1989). Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution. Public Choice, 61, 41-74.
51.
LinzJ. J. (1990). The perils of presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 1, 51-69.
52.
LipsetS. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53, 69-105.
53.
LondreganJ. B.PooleK. T. (1990). Poverty, the coup trap, and the seizure of executive power. World Politics, 42, 151-183.
54.
LuhrmannA.TannenbergM.LindbergS. I. (2018). Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening new avenues for the comparative study of political regimes. Politics and Governance, 6, 60-77.
55.
MagaloniB. (2008). Credible power-sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 715-741.
56.
MarshallM. G.GurrT. R.JaggersK. (2013). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2012. Center for Systemic Peace. Retrieved from https://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
57.
MooreB. (1966). Social origins of democracy and dictatorship: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
PowellJ. (2012). Determinants of the attempting and outcome of coups d’état. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56, 1017-1040.
60.
PowellJ. M.ThyneC. L. (2011). Global instances of coups from 1950-present: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 48, 249-259.
61.
PrzeworskiA.LimongiF. (1997). Modernization: Theory and facts. World Politics, 49, 155-183.
62.
RapportM. (2008). 1848. New York, NY: Basic Books.
63.
RobertsE. (2007). Realm of the black mountain: A history of Montenegro. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
64.
RossM. (2012). The oil curse: How petroleum wealth shapes the development of nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
RubinsteinA. Z. (1981). The Soviet Union and Iran under Khomeini. International Affairs, 57, 599-617.
66.
SchatzbergM. G. (1997). Beyond Mobutu: Kabila and the Congo. Journal of Democracy, 8, 70-84.
67.
SmithD. M. (1989). Italy and its monarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
68.
SvolikM. (2008). Authoritarian reversals and democratic consolidation. American Political Science Review, 102, 153-168.
69.
SvolikM. W. (2012). The politics of authoritarian rule. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70.
TakeyhR. (2014). What really happened in Iran: The CIA, the ouster of Mosaddeq, and the restoration of the Shah. Foreign Affairs, 93(4), 2-12.
71.
TeorellJ. (2010). Determinants of democracy: Explaining regime change in the world, 1972–2006. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
TeorellJ.CoppedgeM.SkaaningS.-E.LindbergS. I. (2019). Measuring Polyarchy Across the Globe, 1900–2017. Studies in Comparative International Development, 54(1), 71-95.
73.
TeorellJ.LindbergS. (2019). Beyond democracy-dictatorship measures: A new framework capturing executive bases of power, 1789–2016. Perspectives on Politics, 17, 66-82.
74.
VreelandJ. R. (2008). The effect of political regime on civil war: Unpacking anocracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 401-425.
75.
ZahraniM. T. (2002). The coup that changed the Middle East: Mossadeq v. The CIA in retrospect. World Policy Journal, 19, 93-99.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
