What leads to the initial emergence of democracy? Many studies view democratization as the product of a class struggle over economic redistribution, pitting the landed elites against the masses or the bourgeoisie. This article, by contrast, argues that the initial emergence of democracy in South America stemmed from a struggle between elite parties or factions that pursued (or opposed) democratic reform to gain (or maintain) political power. Democratization occurred when a split within the ruling party or coalition led dissident factions to side with the opposition and push through reforms that expanded the franchise and leveled the electoral playing field. I explore these arguments by examining the origins of democracy in four Latin American countries: Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Uruguay. Historical process tracing and a quantitative analysis of the vote on a key democratic reform measure in Argentina in 1912 provide support for these arguments.
AcemogluD.RobinsonJ. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Acuña RodríguezO. Y. (2017). The 1910 Colombian constitutional reform and the electoral system (1910-1914). Historia y Memoria, 14, 97-126.
3.
AdelmanJ. (1992). Socialism and democracy in Argentina in the age of the second international. The Hispanic American Historical Review, 72, 211-238.
4.
AlonsoP. (1993). Politics and elections in Buenos Aires, 1890-1898. Journal of Latin American Studies, 25, 465-487.
5.
AlonsoP. (2000). Between revolution and the ballot box: The origins of the radical party in the 1890s. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
AnguitaR. (1912). Leyes Promulgadas en Chile, Desde 1810 Hasta el 1 de Junio de 1912 [Laws promulgated in Chile, from 1810 until June 1, 1912] (Vol. III). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta Nacional.
7.
AnsellB. W.SamuelsD. J. (2014). Inequality and democratization: An elite-competition approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BergquistC. W. (1978). Coffee and conflict in Colombia, 1886-1910. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
BlakemoreH. (1974). British nitrates and Chilean politics, 1886-1896: Balmaceda and north. London, England: The Athlone Press.
10.
BotanaN. R. (2012). El Orden Conservador: La Política Argentina entre 1880 y 1916 [The conservative order: Argentine politics between 1880 and 1916]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Edhasa.
11.
BushnellD. (1993). Colombia: A nation in spite of itself. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
CantónD. (1968). Materiales para el Estudio de la Sociología Política en la Argentina [Materials for the study of political sociology in Argentina] (Vol. I). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Instituto Torcuato Di Tella.
13.
CantónD. (1973). Elecciones y Partidos Políticos en la Argentina: Historia, Interpretación y Balance, 1910-1966 [Elections and political parties in Argentina: History, interpretation and assessment, 1910-1966]. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Argentina Editores.
14.
CárcanoM. A. (1986). Sáenz Peña: La Revolución por los Comicios [Sáenz Peña: Revolution by elections]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Hyspamérica.
15.
CárcanoR. J. (1943). Mis Primeros 80 Años [My first 80 years]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Sudamericana.
16.
CastellanosA.PérezR. (1981). El Pluralismo: Examen de Experiencia Uruguaya, 1830-1918 [Pluralism: An examination of the Uruguayan experience, 1830-1918] (Vol. I). Montevideo, Uruguay: CLAEH.
17.
CastroM. O. (2012). El Ocaso de la República Oligárquica: Poder, Política y Reforma Electoral, 1898-1912 [The decline of the oligarchic republic: Power, politics and electoral reform, 1898-1912]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Edhasa.
CollierR. B. (1999). Paths toward democracy: The working class and elites in Western Europe and Latin America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
CornblitO. (1975). La Opción Conservadora en la República Argentina [The conservative option in the Argentine Republic]. Desarrollo Económico, 14, 599-639.
21.
DevotoF. J. (1996). De Nuevo el Acontecimiento: Roque Sáenz Peña, la Reforma Electoral y el Momento Político de 1912 [The event once again: Roque Sáenz Peña, the electoral reform and the political moment of 1912]. Boletín del Instituto de Historia Argentina y Americana Dr. Emilio Ravignani, 3(14), 93-113.
22.
DrakeP. (2009). Between tyranny and anarchy: A history of democracy in Latin America, 1800-2006. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
Duque DazaJ. (2011). La Reforma Constitucional de 1910: Constantes Institucionales, Consensos y Nuevas Reglas [The constitutional reform of 1910: Institutional continuities, consensus and new rules]. Papel Político, 16, 185-212.
24.
EncinaF. A. (1952). La Presidencia de Balmaceda [The presidency of Balmaceda] (Vol. I). Santiago, Chile: Editorial Nascimento.
25.
GalloE.SigalS. (1963). La Formación de los Partidos Contemporáneos: La Unión Cívica Radical, 1890-1916 [The formation of contemporary parties: The Radical Civic Union, 1890-1916]. Desarrollo Económico, 3, 173-230.
26.
GodioJ. (2000). Historia del Movimiento Obrero Argentino, 1870-2000 [History of the Argentine labor movement, 1870-2000] (Vol. I). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Corregidor.
27.
HartlynJ. (1988). The politics of coalition rule in Colombia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Heaps-NelsonG. (1978). La Aprobación de la Ley Sáenz Peña [The enactment of the Sáenz Peña law]. Revista de Historia, 7, 9-26.
29.
HeiseJ. (1982). El Período Parlamentario, 1861-1925 [The parlamentary period, 1861-1925] (Vol. II). Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
30.
HoraR. (2001). The landowners of the Argentine pampas: A social and political history, 1860-1945. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
Ibarra RuedaH. (2013). Why factions matter: A theory of party dominance at the sub-national level (Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.
32.
JaramilloJ.Franco-CuervoB. (2005). Colombia. In NohlenD. (Ed.), Elections in the Americas (Vol. 2, pp. 295-364). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
JonesM. P.LaugaM.León-RoeschM. (2005). Argentina. In NohlenD. (Ed.), Elections in the Americas (Vol. 2, pp. 59-122). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
LangstonJ. (2006). Elite ruptures: When do ruling parties split? In SchedlerA. (Ed.), Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition (pp. 57-75). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
35.
LehoucqF. (2000). Institutionalizing democracy: Constraint and ambition in the politics of electoral reform. Comparative Politics, 32, 459-477.
36.
LehoucqF.MolinaI. (2002). Stuffing the ballot box: Fraud, electoral reform, and democratization in Costa Rica. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37.
LeirasM.FigueroaV. (2016, June). Rural inequality and democracy: Unpacking landowner’s political influence. Paper presented at the Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, New York, NY.
38.
LindbergS. I. (2006). Democracy and elections in Africa. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39.
LindbergS. I. (Ed.). (2009). Democratization by elections: A new mode of transition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40.
LópezM. J. (2001). Entre la Hegemonía y el Pluralismo: Evolución del Sistema de Partidos Políticos Argentinos [Between hegemony and pluralism: Evolution of the Argentine political party system]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Lumiere.
41.
LópezM. J. (2005a). La Elección de Roque Sáenz Peña y la Estrategia de la Reforma Electoral [The election of Roque Sáenz Peña and the strategy of the electoral reform]. In LópezM. J. (Ed.), De la República Oligárquica a la República Democrática (pp. 216-252). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Lumiere.
42.
LópezM. J. (2005b). La Nueva Ley Electoral [The new electoral law]. In LópezM. J. (Ed.), De la República Oligárquica a la República Democrática (pp. 253-316). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Lumiere.
43.
López-AlvesF. (2000). State formation and democracy in Latin America, 1810-1900. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
44.
MadridR. L. (2019). Opposition parties and the origins of democracy in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 51, 157-178.
45.
MahoneyJ. (2001). The legacies of liberalism: Path dependence and political regimes in central America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
MainwaringS.Pérez-LiñánA. (2013). Democracies and dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, survival, and fall. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47.
MaresI. (2015). From open secrets to secret voting: Democratic electoral reforms and voter autonomy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48.
MazzucaS.RobinsonJ. A. (2009). Political conflict and power sharing in the origins of modern Colombia. Hispanic American Historical Review, 89, 285-321.
49.
MeloJ. O. (1989). De Carlos E. Restrepo a Marco Fidel Suárez: Republicanismo y Gobiernos Conservadores [From Carlos E. Restrepo to Marco Fidel Suárez: Republicanism and conservative governments]. In Tirado MejíaA. (Ed.), Nueva Historia de Colombia (pp. 215-242). Bogotá: Planeta Colombiana Editorial.
50.
MíguezE. J. (2012). Reforma Electoral y Longue Durée [Electoral reform and the long term]. Estudios Sociales, 43, 11-28.
51.
MillerM. K. (2013). Democratic pieces: Autocratic elections and democratic development since 1815. British Journal of Political Science, 45, 501-530.
52.
MooreB. (1967). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
53.
NahumB. (1987). Historia Uruguaya: La Época Batllista, 1905-1930 [Uruguayan history: The Batlle era, 1905-1930] (Vol. 6). Montevideo, Uruguay: Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.
54.
NahumB. (2007). Estadísticas Históricas del Uruguay, 1900-1950 [Historical statistics of Uruguay, 1900-1950] (Vol. I). Montevideo, Uruguay: Universidad de la República.
55.
NohlenD. (2005). Uruguay. In NohlenD. (Ed.), Elections in the Americas: A data handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 487-534). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56.
O’DonnellG. A.SchmitterP. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
57.
Posada-CarbóE. (1997). Limits of power: Elections under the conservative hegemony in Colombia, 1886-1930. Hispanic American Historical Review, 77, 245-279.
58.
PrzeworskiA. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
59.
PrzeworskiA. (2009). Conquered or granted? A history of suffrage extensions. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 291-321.
60.
RemmerK. L. (1977). The timing, pace and sequence of political change in Chile, 1891-1925. The Hispanic American Historical Review, 57, 205-230.
61.
RepettoN. (1956). Mi Paso por la Política: De Roca a Yrigoyen [My journey through politics: De Roca to Yrigoyen]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Santiago Rueda.
62.
República Argentina. (1916a). Tercer Censo Nacional: Levantado el 1 de Junio de 1914 [Third national census: Carried out on June 1, 1914] (Vol. II). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Talleres Gráficos de L. J. Rosso y Cía.
63.
República Argentina. (1916b). Tercer Censo Nacional: Levantado el 1 de junio de 1914 [Third national census: Carried out on June 1, 1914] (Vol. IV). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Talleres Gráficos de L. J. Rosso y Cía.
64.
República Argentina. (1916c). Tercer Censo Nacional: Levantado el 1 de Junio de 1914 [Third national census: Carried out on June 1, 1914] (Vol. VII). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Talleres Gráficos de L. J. Rosso y Cía.
65.
República de Colombia. (1939). Actos Legislativos y Leyes de Colombia Expedidos por la Asamblea Nacional de 1910 [Legislative acts and laws of Colombia issued by the National Assembly of 1910]. Bogotá, Colombia: Imprenta Nacional.
66.
RichmondD. W. (1989). Carlos Pellegrini and the crisis of the Argentine elites, 1880-1916. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
RockD. (1975). Politics in Argentina, 1890-1930: The rise and fall of radicalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
69.
RockD. (2002). State building and political movements in Argentina, 1860-1916. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
70.
Rodríguez PiñeresE. (1956). Hechos y Comentarios: Nova et Vetera [Incidents and commentaries: New and old]. Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Sucre.
71.
RokkanS. (1970). Citizens, elections, parties: Approaches to the comparative study of the processes of development. New York, NY: David McKay Company.
72.
RueschemeyerD.StephensE. H.StephensJ. D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73.
SabatoH. (2001). The many and the few: Political participation in republican Buenos Aires. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
74.
Sáenz PeñaR. (1915). Escritos y Discursos [Writings and speeches] (Vol. II). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Casa Jacobo Peuser.
75.
Salas EdwardsR. (1914). Balmaceda y el Parlamentarismo en Chile: Un Estudio de Psicología Política Chilena [Balmaceda and parlamentarianism in Chile: A study of Chilean political psychology]. Santiago, Chile: Sociedad Imprenta y Litografía Universo.
76.
SchattschneiderE. E. (1942). Party government. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
77.
SchedlerA. (2009). The contingent power of authoritarian elections. In LindbergS. I. (Ed.), Democratization by elections: A new mode of transition (pp. 291-313). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
78.
SchedlerA. (2013). The politics of uncertainty: Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
79.
ScherlisG. (2005). El Partido Socialista y la Reforma Electoral [The Socialist Party and the electoral reform]. In LópezM. J. (Ed.), De la República Oligárquica a la República Democrática (pp. 419-483). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ediciones Lumiere.
80.
ScherlisG.LópezM. J. (2005). ¿De la República Oligárquica a la República Democrática? [From the oligarchic republic to the democratic republic?] In LópezM. J. (Ed.), De la República Oligárquica a la República Democrática (pp. 553-607). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Lumiere.
81.
SciarrottaF. J. (2005). Las Presidencias de Manuel Quintana y de José Figueroa Alcorta [The presidencies of Manuel Quintana and Jose Figueroa Alcorta]. In LópezM. J. (Ed.), De la República Oligárquica a la República Democrática (pp. 143-181). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Lumiere.
82.
Secretaria Parlamentaria. (1991). Nómina Alfabética de Diputados de la Nación: Período 1854-1991 [Alphabetical list of the deputies of the nation: 1854-1991 period]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Honorable Cámara de Diputados de la Nación.
83.
SmithP. H. (1974). Argentina and the failure of democracy: Conflict among political elites, 1904-1955. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
84.
SurianoJ. (2012). La Reforma Electoral de 1912 y la Impugnación Anarquista [The electoral reform of 1912 and the anarchist challenge]. Estudios Sociales, 43, 91-104.
85.
TerrieP. L. (2014). State building and political regimes: The nineteenth-century origins of liberal democracy in Latin America (Doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
86.
ValenzuelaJ. S. (1985). Democratización Vía Reforma: La Expansión del Sufragio en Chile [Democratization by reform: The expansion of the suffrage in Chile]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Instituto de Desarrollo Económico y Social.
87.
ValenzuelaJ. S. (1996). Building aspects of democracy before democracy: Electoral practices in nineteenth century Chile. In Posada-CarbóE. (Ed.), The history of elections in Europe and Latin America (pp. 223-257). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
88.
ValenzuelaJ. S. (1998). La Ley Electoral de 1890 y la Democratización del Régimen Político Chileno [The electoral law of 1890 and the democratization of the Chilean political regime]. Estudios Políticos, 71, 265-296.
89.
VangerM. I. (1980). The Model Country: José Batlle y Ordoñez of Uruguay, 1907-1915. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
90.
VangerM. I. (2010). Uruguay’s José Batlle y Ordoñez: The Determined Visionary, 1915-1917. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
91.
WaddellJ. E. (2005). La Ruptura Roca-Pellegrini y la División del PAN [The Roca-Pellegrini rupture and the division of the PAN]. In LópezM. J. (Ed.), De la República Oligárquica a la República Democrática (pp. 119-142). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Lumiere.
92.
WalterR. J. (1977). The socialist party of Argentina, 1890-1930. Austin, TX: Institute of Latin American Studies.
93.
WalterR. J. (1978). Elections in the city of Buenos Aires during the first Yrigoyen administration: Social class and political preferences. The Hispanic American Historical Review, 58, 595-624.
94.
YasharD. J. (1997). Demanding democracy: Reform and reaction in Costa Rica and Guatemala. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
95.
ZeitlinM. (1984). The civil wars in Chile. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
96.
ZiblattD. (2008). Does landholding inequality block democratization? A test of the bread and democracy thesis and the case of Prussia. World Politics, 60, 610-641.
97.
ZiblattD. (2017). Conservative parties and the birth of democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
98.
ZimmermannE. (2009). Elections and the origins of an Argentine democratic tradition, 1810-1880 (Vol. 365, Kellogg Institute Working Paper). Retrieved from: https://kellogg.nd.edu/documents/1675
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
