Rights for Same-Sex Couples and Public Attitudes Toward Gays and Lesbians in Europe

Abstract

This article investigates how changes in same-sex rights affect attitudes toward homosexuality. We argue that different same-sex relationship policies vary in their impact. Whereas registered partnership laws construct a distinct target population that receives new benefits, marriage equality sends an unambiguously positive signal and reduces the perceived group difference through inclusion into existing rights. As a consequence, marriage equality should have a positive effect on attitudes toward homosexuality, whereas partnership laws should have much less positive effects and could even lead to backlash among some groups. Combining data from eight waves of the European Social Survey with data on legislation, we analyze the effects of same-sex marriage, registered partnerships, and marriage bans on attitudes toward gays and lesbians. Marriage has a positive effect, bans and registered partnerships have a negative effect. Legalized partnership is especially associated with significantly more negative attitudes among nonreligious and less educated people.

Keywords

LGBT rights public opinion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamczyk

Pitt

(2009). Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: The role of religion and cultural context. Social Science Research, 38, 338-351.

Allport

G. W.

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Andersen

Fetner

(2008). Economic inequality and intolerance: Attitudes toward homosexuality in 35 democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 942-958.

Ayoub

P. M.

(2015). Contested norms in new-adopter states: International determinants of LGBT rights legislation. European Journal of International Relations, 21, 293-322.

Ayoub

P. M.

(2016). When states come out: Europe’s sexual minorities and the politics of visibility. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Ayoub

P. M.

Garretson

(2016). Getting the message out: Media context and global changes in attitudes toward homosexuality. Comparative Political Studies, 50, 1055-1085.

Bernstein

(2018). Same-sex marriage and the assimilationist dilemma: A research agenda on marriage equality and the future of LGBTQ activism, politics, communities, and identities. Journal of Homosexuality. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00918369.2017.1423211

Bishin

B. G.

Hayes

T. J.

Incantalupo

M. B.

Smith

C. A.

(2016). Opinion backlash and public attitudes: Are political advances in gay rights counterproductive? American Journal of Political Science, 60, 625-648.

Campbell

A. L.

(2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 333-351.

10.

Dancygier

R. M.

(2010). Immigration and conflict in Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Engeli

Green-Pedersen

Larsen

L. T.

(Eds.). (2012). Morality politics in western Europe: Parties, agendas and policy choices. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

12.

Fernández

J. J.

Lutter

(2013). Supranational cultural norms, domestic value orientations and the diffusion of same-sex union rights in Europe, 1988–2009. International Sociology, 28, 102-120.

13.

Flores

A. R.

Barclay

(2016). Backlash, consensus, legitimacy, or polarization. Political Research Quarterly, 69, 43-56. doi:10.1177/ 1065912915621175

14.

Garretson

(2017). The how, why, and who of LGBTQ “victory”: A critical examination of change in public attitudes involving LGBTQ people. In Brettschneider

Burgess

Keating

(Eds.), LGBTQ politics (pp. 252-269). New York: New York University Press.

15.

Gerhards

(2010). Non-discrimination towards homosexuality: The European union’s policy and citizens’ attitudes towards homosexuality in 27 European countries. International Sociology, 25, 5-28.

16.

Gingrich

Ansell

(2012). Preferences in context: Micro preferences, macro contexts, and the demand for social policy. Comparative Political Studies, 45, 1624-1654.

17.

Heisig

J. P.

Schaeffer

(2018). It just ain’t dope to drop the slope! Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable of a cross-level interaction. SocArXiv. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/BWQTD

18.

Helfer

L. R.

Voeten

(2014). International courts as agents of legal change: Evidence from LGBT rights in Europe. International Organization, 68, 77-110.

19.

Hooghe

Meeusen

(2013). Is same-sex marriage legislation related to attitudes toward homosexuality? Trends in tolerance of homosexuality in European countries between 2002 and 2010. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 10, 258-268.

20.

Kitschelt

Rehm

(2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 1670-1706. Retrieved from http://cps.sagepub.com/content/47/12/1670.abstract

21.

Kriesi

H.-P.

Grande

Lachat

Dolezal

Bornschier

Frey

(2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Kumlin

Stadelmann-Steffen

(Eds.). (2014). How welfare states shape the democratic public: Policy feedback, participation, voting, and attitudes. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

23.

la Roi

Mandemakers

J. J

. (2018). Acceptance of homosexuality through education? Investigating the role of education, family background and individual characteristics in the United Kingdom. Social Science Research, 71, 109-128.

24.

La Sala

. (2007). Too many eggs in the wrong basket: A queer critique of the same-sex marriage movement. Social Work, 52, 181-183.

25.

Lax

J. R.

Phillips

J. H.

(2009). Gay rights in the states: Public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103, 367-386.

26.

Lewis

G. B.

(2011). The friends and family plan: Contact with gays and support for gay rights. Policy Studies Journal, 39, 217-238.

27.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Tropp

L. R.

(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.

28.

Schneider

Ingram

(1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87, 334-347.

29.

Soss

Schram

S. S.

(2007). A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political Science Review, 101, 111-127.

30.

Takács

Szalma

(2011). Homophobia and same–sex partnership legislation in Europe. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 30, 356-378. doi:10.1108/02610151111150627

31.

United Nations Statistics Division. (2016). National accounts estimates of main aggregates. Available from http://data.un.org/

32.

Zaller

(1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

8.82 MB

0.00 MB