Religion’s effect on individual tendency to engage in political protest is influenced both by the resources available to citizens at the individual level and opportunities provided to religious groups and organizations at the country level. Combining data from last two waves of the World Values Surveys with aggregate data on religious regulation, we show that private religious beliefs reduce an individual’s protest potential while involvement in religious social networks fosters it. At the country level, we find that government regulation of religion decreases individual tendency to protest, and has an especially detrimental effect on the likelihood of religious minorities joining peaceful protest activities. These findings are in line with opportunity structure theories that stress the importance of system openness for fostering political protest.
BasedauM.FoxJ.PierskallaJ. H.StrüverG.VüllersJ. (2017). Does discrimination breed grievances –and do grievances breed violence? New evidence from an analysis of religious minorities in developing countries. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 34, 217-239.
4.
Ben-Nun BloomP. (2016). State level restriction of religious freedom and women’s rights: A global analysis. Political Studies, 64(4), 811-831.
5.
Ben-Nun BloomP.ArikanG. (2012). A two-edged sword: The differential effect of religious belief and religious social context on attitudes towards democracy. Political Behavior, 34, 249-276.
6.
Ben-Nun BloomP.ArikanG. (2013). Religion and support for democracy: A cross-national test of the mediating mechanisms. British Journal of Political Science, 43, 375-397.
7.
Ben-Nun BloomP.ArikanG.CourtemancheM. (2015). Religious social identity, religious belief, and anti-immigration sentiment. American Political Science Review, 109, 203-221.
8.
Ben-Nun BloomP.ArikanG.SommerU. (2014). Globalization, threat and religious freedom. Political Studies, 62, 273-291.
9.
BoboL.GilliamF. D. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and black empowerment. American Political Science Review, 84, 377-393.
ChavesM.CannD. E. (1992). Regulation, pluralism, and religious market structure: Explaining religion’s vitality. Rationality and Society, 4, 272-290.
13.
ChavesM.SchraederP. J.SprindysM. (1994). State regulation of religion and Muslim religious vitality in the industrialized West. The Journal of Politics, 56, 1087-1097.
14.
CollinsK. (2007). Ideas, networks, and Islamist movements: Evidence from Central Asia and the Caucasus. World Politics, 60, 64-96.
15.
DaltonR.van SickleA.WeldonS. (2010). The individual-institutional nexus of protest behavior. British Journal of Political Science, 40, 51-73.
16.
DjupeP. A.GilbertC. P. (2006). The resourceful believer: Generating civic skills in church. The Journal of Politics, 68, 116-127.
17.
DjupeP. A.GilbertC. P. (2009). The political influence of churches. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
DjupeP. A.GrantJ. T. (2001). Religious institutions and political participation in America. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 303-314.
19.
EisingerP. K. (1973). The conditions of protest behavior in American cities. American Political Science Review, 67, 11-28.
20.
FinkeR. (2013). Presidential address origins and consequences of religious freedoms: A global overview. Sociology of Religion, 74, 297-313.
21.
FinkeR.StarkR. (1988). Religious economies and sacred canopies. American Sociological Review, 53, 41-49.
22.
FoxJ. (2002). Ethnoreligious conflict in the late twentieth century: A general theory. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
23.
FoxJ. (2004). Religion, civilization and civil war: 1945 through the new millennium. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
24.
FoxJ. (2015). Political secularism, religion, and the state: A time series analysis of worldwide data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25.
FoxJ. (2016). Secular–religious competition in Western democracies: 1990 to 2014. Journal of Religious and Political Practice, 2, 155-174.
26.
FoxJ.BaderC.McClureJ. M. (2017). Don’t get mad: The disconnect between religious discrimination and individual perceptions of government. Conflict Management and Peace Science. doi:10.1177/0738894217723160
27.
FoxJ.TaboryE. (2008). Contemporary evidence regarding the impact of state regulation of religion on religious participation and belief. Sociology of Religion, 69, 245-271.
28.
GillA. (1998). Rendering unto Caesar: The Catholic Church and the state in Latin America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
29.
GillA. (2008). The political origins of religious liberty. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140-150.
31.
GrimB. J.FinkeR. (2006). International religion indexes: Government regulation, government favoritism, and social regulation of religion. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 2(1), 1-40.
32.
GrimB. J.FinkeR. (2007). Religious persecution in cross-national context: Clashing civilizations or regulated religious economies?American Sociological Review, 72, 633-658.
33.
Grzymala-BusseA. (2012). Why comparative politics should take religion (more) seriously. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 421-442.
34.
GurrT. R. (1993). Minorities at risk: A global view of ethnopolitical conflicts. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
35.
GurrT. R. (2000). Peoples versus states: Minorities at risk in the new century. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
36.
HelblingM.TraunmüllerR. (2016). How state support of religion shapes attitudes toward Muslim immigrants: New evidence from a sub-national comparison. Comparative Political Studies, 49, 391-424.
37.
HoffmanM. T.JamalA. (2014). Religion in the Arab spring: Between two competing narratives. The Journal of Politics, 76, 593-606.
38.
HoffmanM. T.NugentE. R. (2017). Communal religious practice and support for armed parties: Evidence from Lebanon. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61, 869-902.
39.
IannacconeL. R. (1991). The consequences of religious market structure: Adam Smith and the economics of religion. Rationality and Society, 32, 156-177.
40.
IsaacsM. (2017). Faith in contention: Explaining the salience of religion in ethnic conflict. Comparative Political Studies, 50, 200-231.
41.
JamalA. (2005). The political participation and engagement of Muslim Americans: Mosque involvement and group consciousness. American Politics Research, 33, 521-544.
42.
JelenT. G.WilcoxC. C. (2002). Introduction: The one, the few, and the many—Religion and politics in comparative perspective. In JelenT.WilcoxC. (Eds.), Religion and politics in comparative perspective: The one, the few, and the many (pp. 1-26). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
43.
JostJ. T.HawkinsC. B.NosekB. A.HennesE. P.SternC.GoslingS. D.GrahamJ. (2014). Belief in a just god (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34, 56-81.
44.
KlandermansB. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583-600.
45.
LaymanG. (2001). The great divide: Religious and cultural conflict in American party politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
46.
MarienS.HoogheM.QuintelierE. (2010). Inequalities in non-institutionalized forms of political participation: A multi-level analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies, 58, 187-213.
47.
McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
48.
McClarendonG.RiedlR. B. (2015). Religion as a stimulant for political participation: Experimental evidence from Nairobi, Kenya. The Journal of Politics, 77, 1045-1057.
49.
McVeighR.SikkinkD. (2001). God, politics, and protest: Religious beliefs and the legitimation of contentious tactics. Social Forces, 79, 1425-1458.
50.
MeyerD. S. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 125-145.
51.
MuchlinskiD. (2014). Grievances and opportunities: Religious violence across political regimes. Politics and Religion, 7, 684-705.
52.
NepstadS. E.WilliamsR. H. (2008). Religion in rebellion, resistance and social movements. In BeckfordJ. A.DemerathJ. (Eds.), Sage handbook of the sociology of religion (pp. 419-437). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
NorrisP. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
PetersonS. A. (1992). Church participation and political participation: The spillover effect. American Politics Research, 20, 123-139.
57.
PhilpottD. (2007). Explaining the political ambivalence of religion. American Political Science Review, 101, 505-525.
58.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
59.
RodneyS.FinkeR. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
60.
SandalN. A. (2012). The clash of public theologies?: Rethinking the concept of religion in global politics. Alternatives, 37, 66-83.
61.
SarkissianA. (2015). The varieties of religious repression: Why governments restrict religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
62.
SaroglouV.DelpierreV.DernelleR. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721-734.
63.
ScheufeleD. A.NisbetM. C.BrossardD. (2003). Pathways to political participation? Religion, communication contexts, and mass media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15, 300-324.
64.
SchwartzS. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In JowellR.RobertsC.FitzgeraldR.EvaG. (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 161-193). London, England: Sage.
65.
SmidtC. E.KellstedtL. A.GuthJ. L. (2009). The role of religion in American politics: Explanatory theories and associated analytical and measurement issues. In SmidtC.KellstedtL. A.GuthJ. L. (Eds.), Oxford handbook on religion and American politics (pp. 3-42). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
66.
StarkR.FinkeR. (1988). American religion in 1776: A statistical portrait. Sociological Analysis, 49, 39-51.
67.
StarkR.FinkeR. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
68.
StarkR.IannacconeL. R. (1994). A supply-side reinterpretation of the “secularization” of Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 230-252.
69.
SteenbergenM.JonesB. S. (2002). Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 218-237.
70.
SteigengaT. J.ColemanK. M. (1995). Protestant political orientations and the structure of political opportunity. Chile, 1972 -1991. Polity, 27, 465-482.
71.
TarrowS. G. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
TillyC. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
73.
TrejoG. (2009). Religious competition and ethnic mobilization in Latin America: Why the Catholic Church promotes indigenous movements in Mexico. American Political Science Review, 103, 323-342.
74.
Van de VijverF. J. R. (2003). Bias and equivalence: Cross-cultural perspectives. In HarknessJ. A.Van de VijverF. J. R.MohlerP. P. (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 143-155). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
75.
VerbaS.NieN. H.KimJ. (1978). Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
76.
VoicuM. (2012). Effect of nationalism on religiosity in 30 European countries. European Sociological Review, 28, 333-343.
77.
VráblíkováK. (2016). How context matters? Mobilization, political opportunity structures, and nonelectoral political participation in old and new democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 203-229.
78.
WaldK. D.SilvermanA. L.FridyK. S. (2005). Making sense of religion in public life. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 121-143.
79.
WaldK. D.WilcoxC. (2006). Getting religion: Has political science rediscovered the faith factor?American Political Science Review, 100, 523-529.
80.
WelzelC.DeutschF. (2012). Emancipative values and nonviolent protest: The importance of “ecological” effects. British Journal of Political Science, 42, 465-479.
81.
WickhamC. R. (2002). Mobilizing Islam: Religion, activism and political change in Egypt. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
