Technological change is widely considered to be a key driver of the economic and occupational structure of affluent countries. Current advances in information technology have led to a significant substitution of routine work by capital, while occupations with abstract or interpersonal manual task structures are complemented or unaffected. We develop a simple theoretical framework for the reasons why individuals in routine task-intensive occupations would prefer public insurance against the increased risk of future income loss resulting from automation. Moreover, we contend that this relation will be stronger for richer individuals who have more to lose from automation. We focus on the role of occupational elements of risk exposure and challenge some general interpretations of the determinants of redistribution preferences. We test the implications of our theoretical framework with survey data for 17 European countries between 2002 and 2012. While up to now the political economy literature has emphasized other occupational risks, we find vulnerability to automation to be an important determinant of the demand for redistribution that should not be ignored.
AiE.NortonC. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80, 123-129.
2.
AlesinaA. F.GiulianoP. (2009). Preferences for redistribution (Technical report). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
AutorD. H.DornD. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the U.S. labor market. American Economic Review, 103, 1553-1597.
4.
AutorD. H.DornD.HansonG. H. (2015). Untangling trade and technology: Evidence from local labour markets. The Economic Journal, 125, 621-646.
5.
AutorD. H.LevyF.MurnaneR. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1279-1333.
6.
BenabouE.OkA. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The POUM hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 447-487.
7.
BetzH.-G. (1994.). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
8.
BurgoonB. (2014.). Immigration, integration, and support for redistribution in Europe. World Politics, 66, 365-405.
9.
BurgoonB.KosterF.EgmondM. v. (2012). Support for redistribution and the paradox of immigration. Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 288-304.
10.
CusackT.IversenT.RehmP. (2006). Risks at work: The demand and supply sides of government redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22, 365-389.
11.
DancygierR.WalterS. (2015). Globalization, labor market risks, and class cleavages. In BeramendiP.HäusermannS.KitscheltH.KriesiH. (Eds.), The politics of advanced capitalism (pp. 133-156). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
EriksonR.GoldthorpeJ. (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
13.
FordM. (2015). Rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of a jobless future. New York, NY: Basic Books.
14.
FreyM.OsborneA. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280.
15.
GingrichJ.AnsellB. (2012). Preferences in context micro preferences, macro contexts, and the demand for social policy. Comparative Political Studies, 45, 1624-1654.
16.
GoldinC.KatzL. (2008). The race between education and technology: The evolution of U.S. educational wage differentials, 1890 to 2005. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
GoosM.ManningA. (2007). Lousy and lovely jobs: The rising polarization of work in Britain. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 118-133.
18.
GoosM.ManningA.SalomonsA. (2014). Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. The American Economic Review, 104, 2509-2526.
19.
GreeneW. (2010). Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models. Economics Letters, 107, 291-296.
20.
GrossmanG. M.Rossi-HansbergE. (2008). Trading tasks: A simple theory of offshoring. American Economic Review, 98, 1978-1997.
21.
HäusermannS.KurerT.SchwanderH. (2015). High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences. Socio-Economic Review, 13, 235-258.
IversenT.CusackR. (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization?World Politics, 52, 313-349.
24.
IversenT.SoskiceD. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95, 875-893.
25.
IversenT.SoskiceD. (2009). Distribution and redistribution: The shadow of the nineteenth century. World Politics, 61, 438-486.
26.
KatzK.MurphyM. (1992.). Changes in relative wages, 1963-1987: Supply and demand factors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 35-78.
27.
KitscheltH.RehmP. (2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 1670-1706.
28.
KopczukW.SaezE.SongJ. (2010). Earnings inequality and mobility in the United States: Evidence from social security data since 1937. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 91-128.
29.
LichbachM. I. (1989). An evaluation of “does economic inequality breed political conflict?” studies. World Politics, 41, 431-470.
30.
LipsetS. M. (1960). Political man: The social basis of modern politics. New York, NY: Doubleday.
31.
MargalitY. (2011, April). Ideology all the way down? The impact of the financial crisis on individuals welfare policy preferences. Paper presented at political economy workshop, Merton College, University of Oxford, UK.
32.
MeltzerS.RichardF. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 914-927.
33.
MichaelsG.NatrajA.Van ReenenJ. (2014.). Has ICT polarized skill demand? Evidence from eleven countries over twenty-five years. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96, 60-77.
34.
MoeneK. O.WallersteinM. (2001). Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution. The American Political Science Review, 95, 859-874.
35.
NelsonK. (2012). Counteracting material deprivation: The role of social assistance in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 148-163.
36.
NieN. HKimJ-o. (1978). Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
OeschD. (2006). Coming to grips with a changing class structure: An analysis of employment stratification in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. International Sociology, 21, 263-288.
38.
OeschD. (2013). Occupational change in Europe: How technology and education transform the job structure. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2008). A profile of immigration populations in the 21st century: Data from OECD countries. Paris, France: Author.
40.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2014a). Indicators of employment protection. Paris, France: Author.
41.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2014b). PPPs and exchange rates. Paris, France: Author.
42.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2014c). Tax-benefit models. Paris, France: Author.
43.
RehmP. (2009). Risks and redistribution: An individual-level analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 855-881.
44.
RomerD. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102.
45.
RommelT.WalterS. (2014, August). The political consequences of offshoring. Washington, DC: Paper presented at the American Political Science Association.
46.
RosenstoneJ.HansenM. (1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York, NY: Macmillan.
47.
RuedaD. (2007). Social democracy inside out: Partisanship and labor market policy in advanced industrialized democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
RuedaD. (in press). Food comes first, then morals: Redistribution preferences, parochial altruism and immigration in Western Europe. The Journal of Politics, 80(1). Retrieved from http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/694201
49.
SchwanderH.HausermannS. (2013). Who is in and who is out? A risk-based conceptualization of insiders and outsiders. Journal of European Social Policy, 23, 248-269.
50.
SinnH.-W. (1995). A theory of the welfare state. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97, 495-526.
51.
SoltF. (2014). The standardized world income inequality database (Technical report, working paper, SWIID version 5.0). Retrieved from http://fsolt.org/papers/solt2016_pre.pdf
52.
Spitz-OenerA. (2006). Technical change, job tasks, and rising educational demands: Looking outside the wage structure. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 235-270.
53.
ThewissenS. (2014). Is it the income distribution or redistribution that affects growth?Socio-Economic Review, 12, 545-571.
WalterS. (2010). Globalization and the welfare state: Testing the microfoundations of the compensation hypothesis. International Studies Quarterly, 54, 403-426.
56.
WalterS. (2017). Globalization and the demand-side of politics: How globalization shapes labor market risk perceptions and policy preferences. Political Science Research and Methods, 5, 55-80.
57.
WrenA. (2013). Introduction: The political economy of post-industrial societies. In The political economy of the service transition (pp. 1-70). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, Wren, Anne.
58.
WrenA.RehmP. (2014). The end of the consensus? Labour market developments and the politics of retrenchment. Socio-Economic Review, 12, 409-435.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
