The issue yield model introduced a theory of the herestethic use of policy issues as strategic resources in multidimensional party competition. We extend the model by systematically addressing the specificities of issue yield dynamics in multiparty systems, with special regard to parties’ issue yield rankings (relative position) and issue yield heterogeneity (differentiation) on each issue. Second, we introduce a novel research design for original data collection that allows for a more systematic testing of the model, by featuring (a) a large number of policy issues, (b) the use of Twitter content for coding parties’ issue emphasis, and (c) an appropriate time sequence for measuring issue yield configurations and issue emphasis. We finally present findings from a pilot implementation of such design, performed on the occasion of the 2014 European Parliament election in Italy. Findings confirm the soundness of the design and provide support for the newly introduced hypotheses about multiparty competition.
AardalB.van WijnenP. (2005). Issue voting. In ThomassenJ. (Ed.), The European voter (pp. 192-212). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
AlvarezR. M.NaglerJ. (1995). Economics, issues and the Perot candidacy: Voter choice in the 1992 presidential election. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 714-744. doi:10.2307/2111651
3.
AlvarezR. M.NaglerJ. (1998). Economics, entitlements, and social issues: Voter choice in the 1996 presidential election. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1349-1363. doi:10.2307/2991862
4.
BarberáP. (2015). Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using twitter data. Political Analysis, 23, 76-91. doi:10.1093/pan/mpu011
5.
BartelsL. M. (1986). Issue voting under uncertainty: An empirical test. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 709-728.
6.
BorreO. (2001). Issue voting: An introduction. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
7.
BrugW.van der EijkC.FranklinM. N. (2007). The economy and the vote : Economic conditions and elections in fifteen countries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BudgeI. (2015). Issue emphases, saliency theory and issue ownership: A historical and conceptual analysis. West European Politics, 38, 761-777. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1039374
9.
BudgeI.FarlieD. J. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections: Issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
10.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. The American Political Science Review, 74, 78-91. doi:10.2307/1955648
11.
ChiaramonteA.EmanueleV. (2015). Party system volatility, regeneration and de-institutionalization in Western Europe (1945–2015). Party Politics, 23, 376-388.
12.
De SioL. (2010). Beyond “position” and “valence”. A unified framework for the analysis of political issues (Working paper). Retrieved from http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/14814
13.
De SioL.EmanueleV.MagginiN. (Eds.). (2014). The European parliament elections of 2014. Rome, Italy: Centro Italiano Studi Elettorali (CISE). Retrieved from http://eprints.luiss.it/1344/
14.
De SioL.FranklinM. N. (2012). Strategic incentives, issue proximity and party support in Europe. West European Politics, 35, 1363-1385. doi:10.1080/01402382.2012.713750
15.
De SioL.FranklinM. N.WeberT. (2016). The risks and opportunities of Europe: How issue yield explains (non-)reactions to the financial crisis. Electoral Studies, 44, 483-491. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.006
16.
De SioL.WeberT. (2014). Issue yield: A model of party strategy in multidimensional space. The American Political Science Review, 108, 870-885. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000379
17.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy.New York, NY: Harper.
18.
DuboisE.GaffneyD. (2014). The multiple facets of influence: Identifying political influentials and opinion leaders on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 1260-1277. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0002764214527088
19.
FleissJ. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Wiley.
20.
FranklinM. N. (1985). Assessing the rise of issue voting in British elections since 1964. Electoral Studies, 4, 37-56. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(85)90030-7
FuchsD.KlingemannH.-D. (1989). The left-right schema. In Kent JenningsM.van DethJ. W. (Eds.), Continuities in political action (pp. 203-234). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
23.
GrahamT.BroersmaM.HazelhoffK.van ’t HaarG. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 692-716. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
24.
Green-PedersenC. (2007). The growing importance of issue competition: The changing nature of party competition in Western Europe. Political Studies, 55, 607-628. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.x
25.
HeathA. F.JowellR.CurticeJ. (2001). The rise of new labour: Party policies and voter choices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
HernándezE.KriesiH. (2016). The electoral consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 55, 203-224. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12122
27.
HoboltS. B.De VriesC. E. (2015). Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition. Comparative Political Studies, 48, 1159-1185.
28.
KaplanN.ParkD. K.RidoutT. N. (2006). Dialogue in American political campaigns? An examination of issue convergence in candidate television advertising. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 724-736. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00212.x
29.
KreissD. (2016). Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society, 18, 1473-1490. doi:10.1177/1461444814562445
30.
LazarsfeldP. F.BerelsonB.GaudetH. (1944). The people’s choice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
31.
McCombsM. E.ShawD. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
32.
MeguidB. M. (2008). Party competition between unequals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MillerA. H.MillerW. E.RaineA. S.BrownT. A. (1976). A majority party in disarray: Policy polarization in the 1972 election. The American Political Science Review, 70, 753-778. doi:10.2307/1959866
34.
NannestadP.PaldamM. (1997). The grievance asymmetry revisited: A micro study of economic voting in Denmark,1986–1992. European Journal of Political Economy, 13, 81-99. doi:10.1016/S0176-2680(96)00034-1
35.
NieN. H.VerbaS.PetrocikJ. R. (1976). The changing American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
NooyW. D.KleinnijenhuisJ. (2013). Polarization in the media during an election campaign: A dynamic network model predicting support and attack among political actors. Political Communication, 30, 117-138. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737417
37.
OspinaR.FerrariS. L. P. (2012). A general class of zero-or-one inflated beta regression models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 56, 1609-1623. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2011.10.005
38.
PageB. I.BrodyR. A. (1972). Policy voting and the electoral process: The Vietnam War issue. The American Political Science Review, 66, 979-995. doi:10.2307/1957489
39.
ParmeleeJ. H. (2013). Political journalists and Twitter: Influences on norms and practices. Journal of Media Practice, 14, 291-305. doi:10.1386/jmpr.14.4.291_1
40.
ParmeleeJ. H.BichardS. L. (2011). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
41.
PasekJ. (2016). When will nonprobability surveys mirror probability surveys? Considering types of inference and weighting strategies as criteria for correspondence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28, 269-291. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv016
42.
PetrocikJ. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850.
43.
PomperG. M. (1972). From confusion to c: Issues and American voters, 1956-1968. The American Political Science Review, 66, 415-428. doi:10.2307/1957786
44.
ReifK.SchmittH. (1980). Nine Second-Order National Elections – a Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x.
45.
RikerW. H. (1986). The art of political manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
SteenbergenM. R.ScottD. J. (2004). Contesting Europe? The salience of European integration as a party issue. In MarksG.SteenbergenM. R. (Eds.), European integration and political conflict (pp. 165-192). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
StokesD. E. (1963). Spatial Models of Party Competition. American Political Science Review, 57, 368-377.
49.
VaccariC.ValerianiA.BarberáP.BonneauR.JostJ. T.NaglerJ.. . .TuckerJ. (2013). Social media and political communication: A survey of Twitter users during the 2013 Italian general election. Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, 3, 381-410. doi:10.1426/75245
50.
Van der EijkC.FranklinM. N. (1996). Choosing Europe? The European electorate and national politics in the face of union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
51.
VerweijP. (2012). Twitter links between politicians and journalists. Journalism Practice, 6, 680-691. doi:10.1080/17512786.2012.667272
52.
WagnerM. (2012). When do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy differentiation influence issue importance. European Journal of Political Research, 51, 64-88. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01989.x
53.
WalgraveS.LefevereJ.TreschA. (2012). The associative dimension of issue ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 771-782. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs023
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
