This article examines how parties use clientelism in competitive and uncompetitive electoral environments. It argues that parties enjoy wide discretion to target clientelistic payoffs to inexpensive voters in their strongholds, but that head-to-head competition compels them to bid for more expensive voters. Empirically, it uses a list experiment embedded in a postelection survey to study electoral clientelism in Lebanon, a country with a mix of competitive and uncompetitive electoral districts. It finds respondents underreport clientelistic transactions by a factor of two. Proxies for the cost of a vote explain payoff targeting decisions in party strongholds, but lose their explanatory power in the competitive districts.
Abd al-KhaliqJ. (2006). Intikhabat al-Istiqlal 2005 [The 2005 independence elections]. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Nahar.
2.
BlairG.ImaiK. (2012). Statistical analysis of list experiments. Political Analysis, 20, 47-77.
3.
BlaydesL. (2011). Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BrattonM. (2008). Vote buying and violence in Nigerian election campaigns. Electoral Studies, 27, 621-632.
5.
BruscoV.NazarenoM.StokesS. C. (2004). Vote buying in Argentina. Latin American Research Review, 39(2), 66-88.
6.
CalvoE.MurilloM. V. (2004). Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 742-757.
7.
CammettM. (2014). Compassionate communalism: Welfare and sectarianism in Lebanon. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
CarlinR. E.MoseleyM. (2015). Good democrats, bad targets: Democratic values and clientelistic vote buying. Journal of Politics, 77, 14-26.
9.
CorstangeD. (2009). Sensitive questions, truthful answers? Modeling the list experiment with LISTIT. Political Analysis, 17, 45-63.
10.
CorstangeD. (2010). The parliamentary election in Lebanon, June 2009. Electoral Studies, 29, 285-289.
11.
CorstangeD. (2012). Vote trafficking in Lebanon. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 44, 483-505.
12.
CorstangeD. (2013). Ethnicity on the sleeve and class in the heart: When do people respond to identity and material interests?British Journal of Political Science, 43, 889-914.
13.
CorstangeD. (2016). The price of a vote in the Middle East. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CoxG. W. (2010). Swing voters, core voters, and distributive politics. In ShapiroI.StokesS. C.WoodE. J.KirshnerA. S. (Eds.), Political representation (pp. 342-357). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15.
DekelE.JacksonM. O.WolinskyA. (2008). Vote buying: General elections. Journal of Political Economy, 116, 351-380.
16.
DhahirN. (2008). An al-Ahzab wal-Dawla fi Lubnan [On parties and the state in Lebanon]. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Nahar. (In Arabic)
17.
DixitA.LondreganJ. (1996). The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics. Journal of Politics, 58, 1132-1155.
18.
el KhazenF. (2000). Intikhabat Lubnan ma ba’d al-Harb 1992, 1996, 2000: Dimuqratiyya bila Khiyar [The postwar Lebanese elections of 1992, 1996, and 2000: Democracy without choice]. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Nahar. (In Arabic)
19.
el KhazenF. (2002). al-Ahzab al-Siyasiyya fi Lubnan: Hudud al-Dimuqratiyya fil-Tajriba al-Hizbiyya [Political parties in Lebanon: The limits of democracy in party experience]. Beirut, Lebanon: al-Markaz al-Lubnani lil-Dirasat. (In Arabic)
20.
Gans-MorseJ.MazzucaS.NichterS. (2014). Varieties of clientelism: Machine politics during elections. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 415-432.
21.
GlynnA. N. (2013). What can we learn with statistical truth serum? Design and analysis of the list experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(Suppl. 1), 159-172.
22.
Gonzalez-OcantosE.de JongeC. K.MeléndezC.OsorioJ.NickersonD. W. (2012). Vote buying and social desirability bias: Experimental evidence from Nicaragua. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 202-217.
23.
HickenA. D. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 289-310.
24.
HydeS. D.MarinovN. (2012). Which elections can be lost?Political Analysis, 20, 191-210.
25.
KeeferP. (2007). Clientelism, credibility, and the policy choices of young democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 804-821.
26.
KitscheltH.KselmanD. M. (2013). Economic development, democratic experience, and political parties’ linkage strategies. Comparative Political Studies, 46, 1453-1484.
27.
KitscheltH.WilkinsonS. I. (Eds.). (2007). Patrons, clients, and policies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KraayA.MurrellP. (2013, June). Misunderestimating corruption (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6488). Washington, DC: World Bank.
29.
LarreguyH.MarshallJ.QuerubínP. (2016). Parties, brokers, and voter mobilization. American Political Science Review, 110, 160-179.
30.
LevinD. H. (2016). When the great power gets a vote: The effects of great power electoral interventions on election results. International Studies Quarterly, 60, 189-202.
31.
LustE. (2009). Democratization by elections? Competitive clientelism in the Middle East. Journal of Democracy, 20, 122-135.
32.
MagaloniB. (2006). Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MasoudT. (2014). Counting Islam. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
NichterS. (2008). Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. American Political Science Review, 102, 19-31.
35.
RobinsonJ. A.TorvikR. (2009). The real swing voter’s curse. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 99, 310-315.
36.
StokesS. C. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99, 315-325.
37.
StokesS. C. (2007). Political clientelism. In BoixC.StokesS. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics (pp. 604-627). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
StokesS. C. (2009, August). Pork, by any other name . . . Building a conceptual scheme of distributive politics. Paper presented at the 2009 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Canada.
39.
SzwarcbergM. (2015). Mobilizing poor voters: Machine politics, clientelism, and social networks in Argentina. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40.
WantchekonL. (2003). Clientelism and voting behavior: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin. World Politics, 55, 399-422.
41.
Weitz-ShapiroR. (2014). Curbing clientelism in Argentina. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
