Sartori’s strictures on conceptual stretching may have distracted the comparative discipline’s attention from a deeper second theme in his work, the shift from top-down, variable-centered analysis to bottom-up (ab imis) political analysis based on individual persons’ decision making and their concrete interactions, a kind of model that has only recently become practical with computer assistance, and which is peculiarly appropriate for a comparative research that seeks to combine case studies and scientific inference. A classic ethnography by Clifford Geertz, based on thick description, is respectfully re-evaluated to show that a bottom-up ontology can provide insights into enduring questions of political science that may elude conventional variable-centered methods. Bottom-up models may add an important dimension to comparative research, bridging old divisions between ethnography, case studies, processes, and mechanisms on one hand, and formalized scientific models on the other.
AlmondG. A. (1973). Chapter 1: Approaches to developmental causation. In AlmondG. A.FlanaganS. C.MundtR. J. (Eds.), Crisis, choice, and change: Historical studies of political development (pp. 1-42). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
2.
AxelrodR. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80, 1095-1111.
3.
AxelrodR. (2006). Agent-based modeling as a bridge between disciplines. In TesfatsionL.JuddK. (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, volume 2. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
4.
AxelrodR. M. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
BatesR. H.GreifA.LeviM.RosenthalJ.-L.WeingastB. R. (1998). Analytic narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BeckN. (2010). Causal process “observation”: Oxymoron or (fine) old wine. Political Analysis, 18, 499-505.
7.
BendorJ.DiermeierD.TingM. (2003). A behavioral model of turnout. American Political Science Review, 97, 261-280.
8.
BevirM. (2008). Meta-methodology: Clearing the underbrush. In Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.BradyH. E.CollierD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 48-70). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
BradyH. E.CollierD. (Eds.). (2004). Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
10.
BremerS. A.MihalkaM. (1977). Machiavelli in machina: Or politics among hexagons. In DeutschK. W. (Ed.), Problems of world modeling: Political and social implications (pp. 303-337). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
11.
CedermanL.-E. (2003). Modeling the size of wars: From billiard balls to sandpiles. American Political Science Review, 97, 135-150.
12.
CedermanL.-E.GirardinL. (2007, September). Toward realistic computational models of civil wars. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Chicago, IL.
13.
ChabalP.DalozJ. P. (1999). Africa works: Disorder as political instrument. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14.
CohenM. R.NagelE. (1962). An introduction to logic. New York, NY: Harbinger.
15.
ColemanJ. S. (1986). Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1309-1335.
16.
CollierD. (2011). Understanding process tracing. Political Science & Politics, 44, 823-830.
17.
CollierD.ElmanC. (2008). Chapter 34: Qualitative and multimethod research. In Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.BradyH. E.CollierD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 779-795). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
CollierD.GerringJ. (Eds.). (2009). Concepts and method in social science: The tradition of Giovanni Sartori. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
CollierD.LevitskyS. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49, 430-451.
20.
CollierD.MahonJ. E.Jr. (1993). Conceptual “stretching” revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 87, 845-855.
21.
Della PortaD.KeatingM. (Eds.). (2008). Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
22.
de MarchiS.PageS. E. (2014). Agent-based modeling. In Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.BradyH. E.CollierD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 71-94). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
DennettD. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
24.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
25.
DruckmanJ. N.GreenD. P.KuklinskiJ. H.LupiaA. (2011). Cambridge handbook of experimental political science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
DunningT. (2012). Natural experiments in the social sciences: A design-based approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
EcksteinH. (1975). Case studies and theory in political science. In GreensteinF.PolsbyN. (Eds.), Handbook of political science, volume 7 (pp. 79-137). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28.
ElsterJ. (1998). Chapter 3: A plea for mechanisms. In HedströmP.SwedbergR. (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 45-73). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
EpsteinJ. M. (2006). Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
EpsteinJ. M.AxtellR. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
31.
EulauH. (1968). The maddening methods of Harold D. Lasswell: Some philosophical underpinnings. Journal of Politics, 30, 3-24.
32.
FearonJ. D.LaitinD. D. (2008). Chapter 33: Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. In Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.BradyH. E.CollierD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 756-776). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
FowlerJ. H.SmirnovO. (2005). Dynamic parties and social turnout: An agent-based model. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1070-1094.
34.
FranzeseR. J.Jr. (2007). Multicausality, context-conditionality, and endogeneity. In BoixC.StokesS. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics (pp. 27-72). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
GeddesB. (2003). Paradigms and sand castles: Theory building and research design in comparative politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36.
GeertzC. (1965). The social history of an Indonesian town. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
38.
GeorgeA. L.BennettA. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
GeorgeA. L.McKeownT. J. (1985). Case studies and theories of organizational decision-making. In ColemanR. F.SmithR. A. (Eds.), Advances in information processing in organizations (pp. 21-58). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40.
GerringJ. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
41.
GiereR. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
GoertzG. (2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
GolderM.GolderS.SiegelD. (2012). Modeling the institutional foundation of parliamentary government formation. Journal of Politics, 74, 427-445.
44.
GouldR. V. (2002). The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1143-1178.
45.
HallP. A. (2003). Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative research. In MahoneyJ.RueschemeyerD. (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 373-404). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
46.
HallP. A.TaylorR. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936-957.
47.
HarréR. (2004). Modeling: Gateway to the unknown (RothbartD., Ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
48.
HedströmP.SwedbergR. (Eds.). (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
HollandJ. H. (2006). Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 19, 1-8.
KimS.TaberC.LodgeM. (2010). A computational model of the citizen as motivated reasoner: Modeling the dynamics of the 2000 presidential election. Political Behavior, 32, 1-28.
52.
KingG.KeohaneR. D.VerbaS. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
KubikJ. (2009). Ethnography of politics: Foundations, applications, prospects. In SchatzE. (Ed.), Political ethnography: What immersion contributes to the study of power (pp. 25-52). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
LaneR. (1996). Positivism, scientific realism and political science: Recent developments in the philosophy of science. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 8, 361-382.
55.
LaPalombaraJ. (1968). Macrotheories and microapplications in comparative politics: A widening chasm. Comparative Politics, 1, 52-78.
56.
LasswellH. (1958). Politics: Who gets what, when, how?Cleveland, OH: Meridian.
57.
LaverM.SergentiE. (2012). Party competition: An agent-based model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
LeviM. (2009). Reconsiderations of rational choice in comparative and historical analysis. In LichbachM. I.ZuckermanA. S. (Eds.), Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure (2nd ed., pp. 117-133). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
LustickI. (2002). PS-I: A user-friendly agent-based modeling platform for testing theories of political identity and political stability. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 5(3).
60.
LustickI. S.MiodownikD. (2009). Abstractions, ensembldes, and virtualizations: Simplicity and complexity in agent-based modeling. Comparative Politics, 41, 223-244.
61.
LustickI. S.MiodownikD.EidelsonR. J. (2004). Secessionism in multicultural states: Does sharing power prevent or encourage it?American Political Science Review, 98, 209-229.
62.
MacalC.NorthM. (2014). Agent-based modeling and simulation. In TolkA.DialloS. Y.RyzhovI. O.YilmazL.BuckelyS.MillerJ. A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2014 Winter Simulation Conference. TolkA.DialloS. Y.RyzhovI. O.YilmazL.BuckelyS.MillerJ. A. Editors Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
63.
MahoneyJ. (2012). The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41, 570-597.
64.
MahoneyJ.RueschmeyerD. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
65.
MairP. (2009). Getting the concepts right. Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association, 20, 1-4.
66.
McAdamD.TarrowS.TillyC. (2001). Dynamics of contention. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
67.
MillerJ. J.PageS. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68.
MunckG. L.SnyderR. (2007). Passion, craft, and method in comparative politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
NewellA.SimonH. (1972). Human problem solving. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
70.
NortonA. (2004). 95 theses on politics, culture, and method. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
71.
PageS. E. (2006). Path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 87-115.
72.
PiersonP. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251-267.
73.
PrzeworskiA. (2007). Is the science of comparative politics possible? In BoixC.StokesS. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics (pp. 147-171). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74.
SartoriG. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64, 1033-1053.
75.
SartoriG. (Ed.). (1984). Social science concepts: A systematic analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
76.
SartoriG. (1991). Comparing and miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3, 243-257.
77.
SartoriG. (1993). Totalitarianism, model mania and learning from error. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 5, 5-22.
78.
SartoriG. (2009). Chapter 3: The tower of Babel. In CollierD.GerringJ. (Eds.), Concepts and method in social science: The tradition of Giovanni Sartori (pp. 61-96). New York, NY: Routledge.
79.
SchatzE. (Ed.). (2009). Political ethnography: What immersion contributes to the study of power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
80.
SchellingT. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
81.
SchreiberD. (2014). The emergence of parties: An agent-based simulation. Political Research Quarterly, 67, 136-151.
82.
ScottJ. C. (1976). Moral economy of the peasant. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
83.
SigmundK. (1993). Games of life: Explorations in ecology, evolution, and behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
84.
SimonH. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1969)
85.
StegmuellerD. (2011). Apples and oranges? The problem of equivalence in comparative research. Political Analysis, 19, 471-487.
86.
TeeleD. L. (Ed.). (2014). Field experiments and their critics: Essays on the uses and abuses of experimentation in the social sciences. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
87.
TillyC. (1985). War making and state making as organized crime. In EvansP. B.RueschemeyerD.SkocpolT. (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 169-191). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. (Originally work published 1982).
88.
TillyC. (2001). Mechanisms in political processes. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 21-41.
89.
von NeumannJ. (1966). Theory of self-reproducing automata (BurksA. W., Ed. & Completed). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
90.
WellerN.BarnesJ. (2014). Finding pathways: Mixed-method research for studying causal mechanisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
91.
WolframS. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.
