There is a rich body of theorizing on the diffusion of democracy across space and time. There is also an emerging scholarship on authoritarian diffusion. The dynamics of the interaction between external democratic and autocratic diffusion processes and their effects on national and sub-national political regime outcomes have received scant attention in the literature. Do democratic diffusion processes help counter external authoritarian influences? And, in contexts where external diffusion of democratic influences is weak, do we observe greater susceptibility to diffusion from regional autocracies that might in turn reinforce authoritarian practices and institutions in “recipient” states? To address these questions, we perform analysis of data from two original under-utilized data sets—a data set on the European Union (EU) aid to Russia’s regions and a data set with statistics on trade among post-Soviet states. We find that EU aid has the effect of countering external authoritarian influences that work through Soviet-era inter-regional economic ties.
AdemmerE.BörzelT. A. (2013). Migration, energy and good governance in the EU’s eastern neighbourhood. Europe-Asia Studies, 65, 581-608.
2.
AllenM.GershmanC. (2006). The assault on democracy assistance. Journal of Democracy, 17(2), 36-51.
3.
AllisonR. (2008). Virtual regionalism, regional structures and regime security in Central Asia. Central Asian Survey, 27, 185-202.
4.
AllisonR. (2013). Russia, the West, and military intervention. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
AmbrosioT. (2007). Insulating Russia from a colour revolution: How the Kremlin resists regional democratic trends. Democratization, 14, 232-252.
6.
AmbrosioT. (2008). Catching the “Shanghai spirit”: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization promotes authoritarian norms in Central Asia. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(8), 13-21.
7.
AmbrosioT. (2010). Constructing a framework of authoritarian diffusion: Concepts, dynamics, and future research. International Studies Perspectives, 11, 375-392.
8.
BeissingerM. R. (2007). Structure and example in modular political phenomena: The diffusion of bulldozer/rose/orange/tulip revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 4, 259-276.
9.
BollenK. (1993). Liberal democracy: Validity and method factors in cross-national measures. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1207-1230.
10.
BrinksD.CoppedgeM. (2006). Diffusion is no illusion: Neighbor emulation in the third wave of democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 463-489.
11.
BrunellP. (2006, November). Promoting democracy backwards (Working Paper No. 28). Madrid, Spain: Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior.
12.
BunceV.WolchikS. L. (2011). Defeating authoritarian leaders in postcommunist countries. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CameronD. R.OrensteinM. A. (2012). Post-Soviet authoritarianism: The influence of Russia in its “near abroad.”Post-Soviet Affairs, 28, 1-44.
14.
CarothersT. (2006, March/April). The backlash against democracy promotion. Foreign Affairs, 85(2), 55-68.
15.
CollinsK. (2009). Economic and security regionalism among patrimonial authoritarian regimes: The case of Central Asia. Europe-Asia Studies, 61, 249-281.
16.
DardenK. A. (2010). Economic liberalism and its rivals: The formation of international institutions among the post-Soviet states. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17.
DeutschK. W. (1954). Political community at the international level: Problems of definition and measurement. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
18.
de WaalT. D. (2010). The Caucasus: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
DiamondL. (2008, March/April). The democratic rollback: The resurgence of the predatory state. Foreign Affairs, 87(2), 36-48.
20.
DimitrovaA.PridhamG. (2004). International actors and democracy promotion in central and eastern Europe: The integration model and its limits. Democratization, 11(5), 91-112.
21.
ElkinsZ.SimmonsB. (2005). On waves, clusters, and diffusion: A conceptual framework. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 33-51.
22.
FinkelE.BrudnyY. M. (2012a). No more colour! Authoritarian regimes and colour revolutions in Eurasia. Democratization, 19, 1-14.
23.
FinkelE.BrudnyY. M. (2012b). Russia and the colour revolutions. Democratization, 19, 15-36.
24.
FordhamB. O.AsalV. (2007). Billiard balls or snowflakes? Major power prestige and the international diffusion of institutions and practices. International Studies Quarterly, 51, 31-52.
25.
FurmanD. (2010). Dvizheniye po spirali: Politicheskaya sistema Rossii v ryadu drugikh sistem [Spiral motion: The Russian political system alongside other political systems]. Moscow, Russia: Ves’ Mir.
26.
Gel’manV.LankinaT. (2008). Authoritarian versus democratic diffusions: Explaining institutional choices in Russia’s local government. Post-Soviet Affairs, 24, 40-62.
27.
Gel’manV.RossC. (Eds.). (2010). The politics of sub-national authoritarianism in Russia. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
28.
Gel’manV.RyzhenkovS.BrieM.OvchinnikovB.SemenovI. (2003). Making and breaking democratic transitions: The comparative politics of Russia’s regions. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
GervasoniC. (2010). A rentier theory of subnational regimes: Fiscal federalism, democracy, and authoritarianism in the argentine provinces. World Politics, 62, 302-340.
30.
GleditschK. S.WardM. D. (2006). Diffusion and the international context of democratization. International Organization, 60, 911-933.
31.
GolosovG. (2011). The regional roots of electoral authoritarianism in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 63, 623-639.
32.
GolunovS. (2005). Rossiysko-Kazakhstanskaya granitsa: Problemy bezopasnosti i mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva [The Russia-Kazakhstan border: Problems of security and international cooperation]. Volgograd, Russia: Volgograd State University.
33.
HaleH. E. (2006). Why not parties in Russia? Democracy, federalism, and the state. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HaleH. E. (2007). Correlates of clientelism: Political economy, politicized ethnicity, and post-communist transition. In KitscheltH.WilkinsonS. I. (Eds.), Patrons, clients and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition (pp. 227-250). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HaleH. E. (2015). Patronal politics: Eurasian regime dynamics in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
KelleyJ. (2006). New wine in old wineskins: Promoting political reforms through the new European neighbourhood policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 29-55.
37.
KoeselK. J.BunceV. J. (2013). Diffusion-proofing: Russian and Chinese responses to waves of popular mobilizations against authoritarian rulers. Perspectives on Politics, 11, 753-768.
38.
KopsteinJ. S.ReillyD. A. (2000). Geographic diffusion and the transformation of the postcommunist world. World Politics, 53, 1-37.
39.
KorostelevaE. A.NatorskiM.SimãoL. (2013). The eastern dimension of the European neighbourhood policy: Practices, instruments and social structures. East European Politics, 29, 257-272.
40.
KynevA. (2006). Izbiratel’naya reforma Vladimira Putina i regional’nyye vybory [Vladimir Putin’s electoral reform and regional elections]. Neprikosnovennyy zapas, 6(50), 117-129.
41.
LangbeinJ.BörzelT. A. (2013). Introduction: Explaining policy change in the European Union’s eastern neighbourhood. Europe-Asia Studies, 65, 571-580.
42.
LankinaT. (2005). Explaining European Union aid to Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 21, 309-334.
43.
LankinaT. (2009). Regional developments in Russia: Territorial fragmentation in a consolidating authoritarian state. Social Research, 76, 225-256.
44.
LankinaT.GetachewL. (2012). Mission or empire, word or sword? The human capital legacy in post-colonial democratic development. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 465-483.
45.
LankinaT.LibmanA.ObydenkovaA. (2016). Appropriation and subversion: Pre-communist literacy, communist party saturation, and post-communist democratic outcomes. World Politics, 68(2), 229-274.
46.
LankinaT.NiemczykK. (2015). What Putin gets about soft power. In CadierD.LightM. (Eds.), Russia’s foreign policy (pp. 97-113). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
LankinaT. V.GetachewL. (2006). A geographic incremental theory of democratization: Territory, aid, and democracy in postcommunist regions. World Politics, 58, 536-582.
48.
LankinaT. V.GetachewL. (2008). The virtuous circles of western exposure in Russian regions: A case for micro-polity analysis of democratic change. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 24, 338-364.
49.
LankinaT. V.HudallaA.WollmannH. (2008). Local governance in central and eastern Europe: Comparing performance in the Czech republic, Hungary, Poland and Russia. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
50.
LevitskyS.WayL. A. (2006). Linkage versus leverage. Comparative Politics, 38, 379-400.
51.
LevitskyS.WayL. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
52.
LibmanA.ObydenkovaA. (2014). International trade as a limiting factor in democratization: An analysis of subnational regions in post-communist Russia. Studies in Comparative International Development, 49, 168-196.
53.
LipsetS. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53, 69-105.
54.
LukinovaE.MyagkovM.OrdeshookP. C. (2011). Metastasised fraud in Russia’s 2008 presidential election. Europe-Asia Studies, 63, 603-621.
55.
MatsuzatoK. (2004). Authoritarian transformation in Mid-Volga national republics: An attempt at macro-regionology. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 20, 98-123.
56.
McFaulM.PetrovN.RiabovA. (2004). Between dictatorship and democracy: Russian post-communist political reform. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
57.
McMannK. (2006). Economic autonomy and democracy: Hybrid regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
MoraskiB.ReisingerW. (2014). The diffusion of deference: Regional machine strength and federal election results in Russia. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
59.
MyagkovM.OrdeshookP. C.ShakinD. (2009). The forensics of electoral fraud: Russia and Ukraine. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
60.
ObydenkovaA. (2008). Regime transition in the regions of Russia: The freedom of mass media: Transnational impact on sub-national democratization?European Journal of Political Research, 47, 221-246.
61.
ObydenkovaA.LibmanA. (2012). The impact of external factors on regime transition: Lessons from the Russian regions. Post-Soviet Affairs, 28, 346-401.
62.
ObydenkovaA.LibmanA. (Eds.). (2015a). Autocratic and democratic external influences in post-Soviet Eurasia. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
63.
ObydenkovaA.LibmanA. (2015b). Causes and consequences of democratization: The regions of Russia. London, England: Routledge.
64.
ObydenkovaA.LibmanA. (2015c). Understanding the survival of post-communist corruption in contemporary Russia: The influence of historical legacies. Post-Soviet Affairs, 31, 304-338.
65.
ObydenkovaA. V. (2012). Democratization at the grassroots: The European Union’s external impact. Democratization, 19, 230-257.
66.
ObydenkovaA.LibmanA. (2014). Understanding the foreign policy of autocratic actors: Ideology or pragmatism? Russia and the Tymoshenko trial as a case study. Contemporary Politics, 20, 347-364.
67.
O’LoughlinJ.WardM. D.LofdahlC. L.CohenJ. S.BrownD. S.ReillyD.ShinM. (1998). The diffusion of democracy, 1946-1994. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88, 545-574.
68.
PanovP.RossC. (2013). Sub-national elections in Russia: Variations in United Russia’s domination of regional assemblies. Europe-Asia Studies, 65, 737-752.
69.
PetrovN.TitkovA. (2013). Reiting demokratichnosti regionov Moskovskogo tsentra Karnegi: 10 let v stroyu [Regional democracy ratings of the Carnegie Moscow Center: Ten years on]. Moscow, Russia: Moscow Carnegie Center.
70.
PevehouseJ. C. (2002). Democracy from the outside-in? International organizations and democratization. International Organization, 56, 515-549.
71.
PevehouseJ. C.RussettB. (2006). Democratic international governmental organizations promote peace. International Organization, 60, 969-1000.
72.
PlantanE. (2014, June). Artful Oppositions and Savvy Dictators: Cycles of Innovative Dissent and Authoritarian Learning. Paper presented at the Comparative Workshop on Mass Protests, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, England.
73.
PridhamG. (1994). The international dimension of democratisation: Theory, practice, and inter-regional comparisons. In PridhamG.HerringE.SanfordG. (Eds.), Building democracy? The international dimension of democratisation in eastern Europe (pp. 7-31). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
74.
ReddawayP.OrttungR. W. (Eds.). (2005a). The dynamics of Russian politics: Putin’s reform of federal-regional relations (Vol. 1). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
75.
ReddawayP.OrttungR. W. (Eds.). (2005b). The dynamics of Russian politics: Putin’s reform of federal-regional relations (Vol. 2). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
76.
RemingtonT. F. (2011). The politics of inequality in Russia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
77.
ReuterO. J.BuckleyN. (2015, November19-22). Performance incentives under autocracy: Evidence from Russia’s regions. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies, Philadelphia, PA.
78.
ReuterO. J.RemingtonT. (2009). Dominant party regimes and the commitment problem: The case of United Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 501-526.
79.
ReuterO. J.RobertsonG. (2012). Subnational appointments in authoritarian regimes: Evidence from Russian gubernatorial appointments. The Journal of Politics, 74, 1023-1037.
80.
RochlitzM. (2014, October22-24). Elections vs. appointments: Comparing incentive patterns for Russian governors under Putin. Paper presented at the Restructuring State and Society in Russia: 14th Annual Aleksanteri Conference, University of Helsinki, Finland.
81.
RossM. (2001). Does oil hinder democracy?World Politics, 53, 325-361.
82.
SaikkonenI. A.-L. (2015). Electoral mobilisation and authoritarian elections: Evidence from post-Soviet Russia. Government & Opposition. Advance online publication. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gov.2015.20
83.
SchimmelfennigF. (2002). Introduction. In LindenR. H. (Ed.), Norms and nannies: The impact of international organizations on the central and east European states (pp. 1-29). Lanham, MD: Rowmand & Littlefield.
84.
SchimmelfennigF.SedelmeierU. (Eds.). (2005). The Europeanization of central and eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
85.
SharafutdinovaG. (2011). Political consequences of crony capitalism inside Russia. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
86.
SilitskiV. (2009). Tools of autocracy. Journal of Democracy, 20(2), 42-46.
87.
SilitskiV. (2010). Contagion deterred: Preemptive authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union. In BunceV.McFaulM. A.Stoner-WeissK. (Eds.), Democracy and authoritarianism in the postcommunist world (pp. 274-299). New York: Cambridge University Press.
88.
SmithK. E. (2005). The outsiders: The European neighbourhood policy. International Affairs, 81, 757-773.
89.
Stoner-WeissK. (1997). Local heroes: The political economy of Russian regional governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
90.
VachudovaM. (2005). Europe undivided: Democracy, leverage, and integration after communism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
91.
VanhanenT. (2000). A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810-1998. Journal of Peace Research, 37, 251-265.
92.
WalkerC.KellyS. (2007). Ruling by law: Ambitions and limits of the 21st century authoritarian model. New York, NY: Freedom House.
93.
WayL. A. (2005). Kuchma’s failed authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 16, 131-145.
94.
WayL. A. (2010). Resistance to contagion: Sources of authoritarian stability in the former Soviet Union. In BunceV.McFaulM.Stoner-WeissK. (Eds.), Democracy and authoritarianism in the postcommunist world (pp. 229-252). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
95.
WhiteheadL. (2001). Three international dimensions of democratization. In WhiteheadL. (Ed.), The international dimensions of democratization: Europe and the Americas (Expanded ed., pp. 3-25). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
96.
WilsonA.PopescuN. (2009). Russian and European neighbourhood policies compared. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 9, 317-331.
97.
WilsonJ. L. (2009). Coloured revolutions: The view from Moscow and Beijing. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 25, 369-395.
98.
ZielonkaJ.PravdaA. (Eds.). (2001). Democratic consolidation in eastern Europe: International and transnational factors (Vol. 2). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
