The dramatic rise of democratic regimes around the world has coincided with an equally significant increase in migration, characterized by an unprecedented movement of people from emerging to established democracies. Through analysis of survey data from six Latin American countries, we offer an empirical evaluation of theoretical mechanisms through which migration can shape the political behaviors of non-migrants in sending nations. We find that individuals who have strong cross-border ties that connect them with relatives living in the United States are more likely to participate in local politics, sympathize with a political party, and persuade others to vote for a party. Those effects are influenced by the positive impact of cross-border ties on civic community involvement, political interest, and political efficacy. Moreover, the evidence suggests that frequent usage of the Internet among non-migrants with strong cross-border ties results in increased political knowledge, which contributes to their greater political interest and efficacy.
AlmondG. A.VerbaS. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
BadaX. (2011). Participatory planning across borders: Mexican migrant civic engagement in community development. The Latin Americanist, 55, 9-33.
3.
BatesonR. (2012). Crime victimization and political participation. The American Political Science Review, 106, 570-587.
4.
BenitezJ. L. (2006). Transnational dimensions of the digital divide among Salvadoran immigrants in the Washington DC metropolitan area. Global Networks, 6, 181-199.
5.
BenitezJ. L. (2012). Salvadoran transnational families: ICT and communication practices in the network society. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38, 1439-1449.
6.
BradyH. E.VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. The American Political Science Review, 89, 271-294.
7.
BravoJ. (2009). Emigración y compromiso político en México [Emigration and political engagement in Mexico]. Gobierno y Política, 1, 273-310.
8.
BurgessK. (2012). Collective remittances and migrant-state collaboration in Mexico and El Salvador. Latin American Politics and Society, 54, 119-146.
9.
BurgessK. (2014). Unpacking the Diaspora channel in new democracies: When do migrants act politically back home?Studies in Comparative International Development, 49, 13-43.
10.
CórdovaA. B. (2009). Methodological note: Measuring relative wealth using household asset indicators (AmericasBarometer Insights Series). Retrieved from http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights2009.php
11.
DekkerR.EngbersenG. (2012, November). How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration (Working Paper No. 64). Oxford, UK: International Migration Institute, University of Oxford.
GermanoR. (2013). Migrants’ remittances and economic voting in the Mexican countryside. Electoral Studies, 32, 875-885.
14.
GlynnA. N.QuinnK. M. (2010). An Introduction to the augmented inverse propensity weighted estimator. Political Analysis, 18, 36-56.
15.
GoodmanG. L.HiskeyJ. (2008). Exit without leaving: Political disengagement in high migration municipalities in Mexico. Comparative Politics, 40, 169-188.
16.
GriecoE. M.TrevelyanE.LarsenL.AcostaY. D.GambinoC.de la CruzP.. . .WaltersN. (2012). The size, place of birth, and geographic distribution of the foreign-born population in the U.S.: 1960–2010 (Population Division Working Paper, Vol. 96). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
17.
HeeringaS.WestB. T.BerglundP. A. (2010). Applied survey data analysis (Statistics in the Social and Behavioral Sciences Series). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
18.
KapurD. (2010). Diaspora, development, and democracy: The domestic impact of international migration from India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
KenskiK.StroudN. (2006). Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 50, 173-192.
20.
KimY. C.Ball-RokeachS. J. (2009). New immigrants, the internet, and civic society. In ChadwickA.HowardP. N. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 275-287). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
KishL. (1995). Survey sampling. New York, NY: John Wiley.
22.
La Página. (2014, March4). Deportistas de Long Island piden llamar a sus familiares en El Salvador para votar por el FMLN [Long Island athletes urge others to call their relatives in El Salvador to vote for the FMLN]. Available from www.lapagina.com
23.
Latino Decisions. (2014). State of the Latino family: Results. Available from www.latinodecisions.com
24.
LevittP. (1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32, 926-948.
25.
LevittP. (2001). The transnational villagers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
LevittP.Lamba-NievesD. (2011). Social remittances revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37, 1-22.
27.
MeseguerC.AparicioF. J. (2012a). Migration and distributive politics: The political economy of Mexico’s 3x1 Program. Latin American Politics and Society, 54, 147-178.
28.
MeseguerC.AparicioF. J. (2012b). Supply or demand? Migration and political manipulation in Mexico. Studies in Comparative International Development, 47, 411-440.
29.
MorganJ.HartlynJ.EspinalR. (2011). Dominican party system continuity amid regional transformations: Economic policy, clientelism, and migration flows. Latin American Politics and Society, 53, 1-32.
30.
MossbergerK. (2009). Towards digital citizenship: Addressing inequality in the information age. In ChadwickA.HowardP. N. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 173-185). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
MossbergerK.TolbertC. J.McNealR. S. (2007). Digital citizenship: The internet, society and participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
NybladeB.O’MahonyA. (2014). Migrants’ remittances and home country elections: Cross-national and subnational evidence. Studies in Comparative International Development, 49, 44-66.
33.
O’MahonyA. (2013). Political investment, remittances, and elections. British Journal of Political Science, 43, 799-820.
34.
OrozcoM. (2002). Latino hometown associations as agents of development in Latin America. In DeR. O.GarzalaLowellB. L. (Eds.), Sending money home (pp. 85-99). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
35.
OrozcoM.LapointeM. (2004). Mexican hometown associations and development opportunities. Journal of International Affairs, 57, 1-21.
36.
Pérez-ArmendárizC. (2014). Cross-border discussions and political behavior in migrant-sending countries. Studies in Comparative International Development, 49, 67-88.
37.
Pérez-ArmendárizC.CrowD. (2010). Do migrants remit democracy? International migration, political beliefs, and behavior in Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 119-148.
38.
PfutzeT. (2012). Does migration promote democratization? Evidence from the Mexican transition. Journal of Comparative Economics, 40, 159-175.
39.
RobinsJ. M.RotnitzkyA. (1995). Semiparametric efficiency in multivariate regression models with missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 122-129.
40.
SmithR. C. (2006). Mexican New York: The transnational lives of new immigrants. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
StataCorp. (2013). Stata treatment effects reference manual: Potential outcomes/counterfactual outcomes—Release 13. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
42.
VerbaS.NieN. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
43.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
WaldingerR. (2014). Engaging from abroad: The sociology of emigrant politics. Migration Studies, 2, 319-339.
45.
WaldingerR.PopkinE.MaganaH. A. (2008). Conflict and contestation in the cross-border community: Hometown associations reassessed. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31, 843-870.
46.
WangL.PreacherK. J. (2015). Moderated mediation analysis using Bayesian methods. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22, 249-263.
47.
YuanY.MacKinnonD. P. (2009). Bayesian mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 14, 301-322.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
