International migrants are agents of democratic diffusion. They spread attitudes and behaviors absorbed in democratic host countries to their less democratic home countries by way of three processes: (a) migrant returns, (b) cross-border communication between migrants still abroad and their friends and family back home, and (c) migrant information networks in high-volume migration-producing communities. Marshaling data from an original June 2006 national survey in Mexico, the authors show that through one or another of these processes, migration alters the political participation and behavior of Mexicans living in Mexico.
Alarcón, R. ( 2000). Development of home town associations in the United States and the use of social remittances in Mexico. Retrieved October 5, 2006, http://www.thedialogue.org/publications/country_studies/remittances/alarcon.pdf
2.
Almond, G.A., & Verba, S. ( 1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Brinks, D., & Coppedge, M. ( 2006). Diffusion is no illusion. Comparative Political Studies, 39(4), 463-489.
5.
Burgess, K. ( 2005). Migrant philanthropy and local governance. In B. Merz (Ed.), New patterns for Mexico: Observations on remittances, philanthropic giving, and equitable development (pp. 99-157). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Camp, R. ( 2003). Learning democracy in Mexico and the United States. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos, 19(1), 3-27.
7.
Clarke, H.D., Dutt, N., & Kornberg, A. ( 1993). The political economy of attitudes toward polity and society in WesternEuropean democracies. Journal of Politics , 55(4), 998-1021.
8.
Consejo Nacional de Población. (2002 a). Índice de intensidad migratoria México-Estados Unidos [Migration Intensity Index Mexico-U.S.]. Mexico, D.F.: CONAPO.
9.
Consejo Nacional de Población. (2002 b). Índice de marginación al nivel localidad, 2000 [Local Level Marginalization Index, 2000]. Retrieved December 10, 2005, http://www.conapo.gob.mx/publicaciones/marg_loc.htm
10.
Cornelius, W.A. ( 1992). From sojourners to settlers: The changing profile of Mexican migration to the United States. In J. A. Bustamante, C. W. Reynolds, & R. Hinojosa-Ojeda (Eds.), U.S.-Mexico relations: Labor market interdependence (pp. 155-195). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Curran, S.R., Garip, F., Chung, C.Y., & Tangchonlatip, K. (2005). Gendered migrant social capital: Evidence from Thailand. Social Forces, 84(1), 225-255.
12.
Cuecuecha, A. ( 2006). Why do people go home again? (CIE-ITAM working paper) . Retrieved March 5, 2007, http://ciep.itam.mx/~acuecuech/Whydopeople2.pdf
13.
Dahl, R.A. ( 1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Dahl, R.A. ( 1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
de la Garza, R.O., & Yetim, M. ( 2003). The impact of ethnicity and socialization on definitions of democracy: The case of Mexican Americans and Mexicans. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos, 19(1), 81-104.
16.
Diamond, L. (Ed.). (1994). Political culture and democracy in developing countries. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
17.
Dominguez, J.I. ( 1994). Cuba in a new world. In A. F. Lowenthal & G. F. Treverton (Eds.), Latin America in a new world (pp. 203-216). Boulder, CO: Westview.
18.
Dominguez, J.I. ( 1997). Technopols: Freeing politics and markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
19.
Elkins, Z., & Simmons, B. ( 2005). On waves, clusters and diffusion: A conceptual framework . The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 33-51.
20.
Escobar Latapí, A., & Martin, S., and Coordinators. (2006). Mexico-U.S. migration: A binational approach, executive summary. In New report studies Mexico-U.S. migration. Washington, DC: William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Retrieved February 6, 2007 , http://www.hewlett.org/Programs/GlobalAffairs/Publications/
21.
Fitzgerald, D. ( 2000). Negotiating extra-territorial citizenship: Mexican migration and the transnational politics of community (Monograph Series No. 2). La Jolla: University of California, San Diego.
22.
Freedom House. (2007). Freedom in the world country reports. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=15
23.
Fukuyama, F. ( 1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Penguin.
24.
Glick Schiller, N. ( 2005). Transborder citizenship: An outcome of legal pluralism within transnational social fields. In K. von Benda Beckmann, F. von Benda Beckmann , & A. Griffiths (Eds.), Mobile people, mobile law (pp. 27-60). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
25.
Goldring, L. ( 2002). The Mexican state and transmigrant organizations. Latin American Research Review, 37(3), 55-99.
26.
Goodman, G.L., & Hiskey, J.T. ( 2008). Exit without leaving: Political disengagement in high migration municipalities in Mexico. Comparative Politics, 40(2), 3-39.
27.
Heckman, J.J. ( 1978). Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica, 46(4), 931-959.
28.
Held, D., McGrew, A.G., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. ( 1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture . Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
Herzog, H.W., & Schlottmann, A.M. (1983). Migrant information, job search and the remigration decision. Southern Economic Journal , 50(1), 43-56.
30.
Hirschman, A.O. ( 1986). Rival views of market society and other recent essays . New York: Viking.
31.
Huntington, S.P. ( 1984). Will more countries become democratic? Political Science Quarterly, 99(2), 193-218.
32.
Inegi. (2000). Censo general de población y vivienda 2000 [General population and housing census 2000]. Retrieved May 5, 2005, from http://www.inegi.gob.mx/inegi/default.aspx?s=est&c=10202
33.
Kapur, D., & McHale, J. (2005). Give us your best and brightest . Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
34.
Keck, M.E., & Sikkink, K. ( 1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
Kurtz, M.J. ( 2004). Free market democracy and the Chilean and Mexican country-side . New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Levitt, P. ( 1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32(4), 926-948.
37.
Levitt, P., & Glick Schiller, N. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(145), 595-629.
38.
Marcelli, E., & Cornelius, W.A. (2001). The changing profile of Mexican migrants to the United States: New evidence from California and Mexico . Latin American Research Review, 36(3), 105-131.
39.
Marcelli, E., & Cornelius, W.A. (2005). Immigrant voting in home-country elections: Potential consequences of extending the franchise to expatriate Mexicans residing in the United States. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos, 20(2), 429-460.
40.
Massey, D.S., Alarcón, R., Durand, J., & González, H. (1987). Return to Aztlán: The social process of international migration from Western Mexico (Studies in Demography 1). Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
Massey, D.S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J.E. ( 1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal . Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431-466.
42.
Massey, D.S., & Espinosa, K.E. (1997). What’s driving Mexico-US migration: A theoretical, empirical, and policy analysis. Journal of Sociology, 102(4), 939-1000.
43.
Merino, J. ( 2005, April). Getting money, getting political: The role of remittances on democratic transitions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
44.
Most, B.A., & Starr, H. ( 1990). Theoretical and logical issues in the study of international diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(4), 391-412.
45.
Norris, P. ( 1999). Introduction: The growth of critical citizens? In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance (pp. 1-29). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46.
Nyberg-Sorensen, N.Van Hear, N., & Engberg-Pedersen, P. (2002). The migration-development nexus evidence and policy options state-of-the-art overview. International Migration, 40(5), 3-47.
47.
Orozco, M. ( 2006, October). Between hardship and hope: Remittances and the local economy in Latin America. Retrieved April 5, 2007, from http://www.12.georgetown.edu/sfs/isim/Publications/RCRCCPubs/Orozco/Remittances%20and%20the%20local%20economy%20in%20Latin%20America%20REPORT.pdf
48.
Przeworski, A. ( 1992). Games of transition. In S. Mainwairing, G. O’Donnell, & J. S. Valenzuela (Eds.), Issues in democratic consolidation (pp. 105-152). Notre Dame : University of Notre Dame Press.
49.
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M.E., Cheibub, J.A., & Limongi, F. ( 2000) Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R.Y. ( 1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Ratha, D., & Xu, D. ( 2008). Migration and remittances factbook. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPROSPECTS/Resources/3349341199807908806/World.pdf
52.
Reyes, B. ( 1997). Dynamics of immigration: Return migration to Western Mexico. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
53.
Reyes, B. ( 2004). Changes in trip duration for Mexican immigrants to the United States. Population Research and Policy Review, 23(3), 235-257.
54.
Reyes, B., Johnson, H.P., &Van Swearingen, R. (2002). Holding the line? The effect of recent border build-up on unauthorized immigration. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California .
55.
Rivera Salgado, G. ( 1999). Mixtec activism in Oaxacalifornia. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(9), 1439-1458.
56.
Scheffer, G. ( 2003). Diaspora politics: At home abroad. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Singer, J., & Willett, J. ( 2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
58.
Smith, M.P. ( 2003). Transnationalism, the state, and the extraterritorial citizen. Politics and Society, 31(4), 467-503.
59.
Smith, R. ( 1995). "Los ausentes siempre presentes": The imagining, making and politics of a transnational community between Ticuani Puebla, Mexico and New York City. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
60.
Starr, H. ( 1991). Democratic dominoes: Diffusion approaches to the spread of democracy in the international system. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35(2), 356-381.
61.
Strang, D. ( 1991). Adding social structure to diffusion models. Sociological Methods & Research, 19(3), 324-353.
62.
Tarrow, S. ( 2005). The new transnational activism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Taylor, J.E. ( 1999). The new economics of labor migration and the role of remittances in the migration process. International Migration , 37(1), 63-88.
64.
Weyland, K. ( 2004). Learning from foreign models in Latin American policy reform. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
65.
Wong, R., Palloni, A., & Soldo, B.J. ( 2007). Wealth in middle and old age in Mexico: The role of international migration. International Migration Review, 41(1), 127-151.
66.
World Values Survey 1999-2000. Retrieved on February 2, 2008 from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/
