Contemporary models of political economy suggest that reforms intended to reduce grievances should curtail unrest, a perspective at odds with many traditional accounts of reform and rebellion. We explore the impact of reform on rebellion with a new data set on peasant disturbances in 19th-century Russia. Using a difference-in-differences design that exploits the timing of various peasant reforms, we document a large increase in disturbances among former serfs following the Emancipation Reform of 1861, a development counter to reformers’ intent. Our analysis suggests that this outcome was driven by peasants’ disappointment with the reform’s design and implementation—the consequence of elite capture in the context of a generally weak state—and heightened expectations of what could be achieved through coordinated action. Reform-related disturbances were most pronounced in provinces where commune organization facilitated collective action and where fertile soil provoked contestation over land.
AcemogluD.RobinsonJ. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AlbertusM.KaplanO. (2012). Land reform as a counterinsurgency policy: Evidence from Colombia. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57, 198-231.
3.
AlstonL. J.LibecapG. D.MuellerB. (2000). Land reform policies, the sources of violent conflict, and implications for deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 162-188.
4.
AnsellB.SamuelsD. (2010). Inequality and democratization: A contractarian approach. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 1543-1574.
5.
BlumJ. (1948). Noble landowners and agriculture in Austria, 1815-1848. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
6.
BlumJ. (1961). Lord and peasant in Russia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BoixC. (2003). Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BradyN. C.WeilR. R. (2002). The nature and property of soils. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
BunceV. (1993). Domestic reform and international change: The Gorbachev reforms in historical perspective. International Organization, 47, 107-138.
10.
BushenA. (1863). Nalichnoe naselenie Rossii za 1858 god [The peasant population of Russia for the year 1858]. St. Petersburg, Russia: Karl Vul’f.
11.
ChernukhaV. G. (1972). Krestianskii vopros v pravitel’stvennoi politike Rossii (60-70 gody XiX v.) [The peasant question in Russian government politics (60s-70s of the XIX century)]. Leningrad, Russia: Nauka.
12.
DegtiarevA.KashchenkoS.RaskinD. (1990). Novgorodskaia derevnia v reforme 1861 goda [The Novgorod countryside in the 1861 Reform]. Leningrad, Russia: Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo Universiteta.
13.
DennisonT. (2011). The institutional framework of Russian serfdom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DewatripontM.RolandG. (1992). Economic reform and dynamic political constraints. Review of Economic Studies, 59, 703-730.
15.
DomarE. D. (1970). The causes of slavery or serfdom: A hypothesis. The Journal of Economic History, 30, 18-32.
16.
DomarE. D.MachinaM. J. (1984). On the profitability of Russian serfdom. The Journal of Economic History, 44, 919-955.
17.
DruzhininN. (1961). Vvedenie. In KudriavtsevaZ. I.PainaE. S.SorokinaN. F. (Eds.), Krest’ianskoe dvizhenie v Rossii v. 1796-1825 gg.: Sbornik dokumentov [The peasant movement in Russia, 1796-1825: Collection of documents]. Moscow, Russia: Izdatel’stvo Sotsial’no-Ekonomicheskoi Literatury.
18.
DunningT. (2008). Crude democracy: Natural resource wealth and political regimes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
EasleyR. (2002). Opening public space: The peace arbitrator and rural politicization, 1861-1864. Slavic Review, 61, 707-731.
20.
EasleyR. (2009). The emancipation of the serfs in Russia: Peace arbitrators and the development of civil society. London, England: Routledge.
21.
EcksteinH. (1975). Case studies and theory in political science. In GreensteinF. I.PolsbyN. W. (Eds.), Handbook of political science (Vol. 7, pp. 94-137). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22.
EddieS. A. (2013). Freedom’s price: Serfdom, subjection, and reform in Prussia, 1648-1848. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
EpsteinD.O’HalloranS. (1999). Delegating powers: A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
EvtuhovC. (2011). Portrait of a Russian province. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
25.
FernandezR.RodrikD. (1991). Resistance of reform: Status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty. American Economic Review, 81, 1146-1155.
26.
FieldD. (1976a). The end of serfdom: Nobility and peasantry in Russia, 1855-1861. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
FieldD. (1976b). Rebels in the name of the Tsar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
28.
GandhiJ.PrzeworskiA. (2006). Cooperation, cooptation, and rebellion under dictatorships. Economics & Politics, 18, 1-26.
29.
GerringJ. (2007). Is there a (viable) crucial-case method?Comparative Political Studies, 40, 231-253.
30.
GerschenkronA. (1965). Agrarian policies and industrialization in Russia 1861–1917. In HabakkukH. J.PostanM., eds., The Cambridge economic history of Europe (Vol. 6, Pt. 2, pp. 706-800). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
GoldstoneJ. A. (1980). Theories of revolution: The third generation. World Politics, 32, 425-453.
32.
GoldstoneJ. A. (2001). Toward a fourth generation of revolutionary theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 139-187.
33.
GrossmanH. I. (1994). Production, appropriation, and land reform. American Economic Review, 84, 705-712.
34.
GurrT. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
HaggardS.KaufmanR. R. (2012). Inequality and regime change: Democratic transitions and the stability of democratic rule. American Political Science Review, 106, 495-516.
36.
HochS. L. (1989). Serfdom and social control in Russia: Petrovskoe, a village in Tambov. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
HochS. L. (1991). The banking crisis, economic reform, and economic development in Russia, 1857–1861. American Historical Review, 96, 795-820.
38.
HochS. L. (2004). Did Russia’s emancipated serfs really pay too much for too little land? Statistical anomalies and long-tailed distributions. Slavic Review, 63, 247-274.
39.
HuberJ. D.ShipanC. R. (2002). Deliberate discretion? The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40.
HuntingtonS. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
IvanovL. (Ed.). (1964). Krest’ianskoe dvizhenie v Rossii v. 1861-1869 gg.: Sbornik dokumentov [The peasant movement in Russia, 1861-1869: Collection of documents]. Moskva, Russia: Mysl’.
42.
KashchenkoS. (2009). Osvobozhdenie krest’ian na Severo-Zapade Rossii [Emancipation of the peasants in northwest Russia]. St. Petersburg, Russia: Al’ians.
43.
KhristoforovI. (2011). Sud’ba reformy: Russkoe krest’ianstvo v pravitel’stvennoi politike do i posle otmeny krepostnogo prava (1830-1890-e gg.) [Reform’s fate: The Russian peasantry in government politics before and after the abolition of serfdom (1830-1890s)]. Moscow, Russia: Sobranie.
44.
KieniewiczS. (1969). The emancipation of the Polish peasantry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
Kimerling WirtschafterE. (2008). Russia’s age of serfdom: 1649–1861. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
46.
KingG.TomzM.WittenbergJ. (2000). Making the most of statistical analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 347-361.
47.
KosáryD. G. (1941). A history of Hungary. Cleveland, OH: Benjamin Franklin Bibliophile Society.
48.
LindertP. H.NafzigerS. (2014). Russian inequality on the eve of revolution. The Journal of Economic History, 74, 767-798.
49.
LinkE. M. (1974). The emancipation of the Austrian peasant 1740-1798. New York, NY: Octagon Books.
50.
LitvakB. (1972). Russkaia derevnia v reforme 1861 goda. Chernozemnyi Tsentr [The Russian countryside in the 1861 reform. The black-earth center]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka.
51.
MarcumA.SkarbekD. (2014). Why didn’t slaves revolt more often during the middle passage?Rationality and Society, 26, 236-262.
52.
MarkevichA.ZhuravskayaE. (2013). Economic consequences of emancipation of serfs: Evidence from Russia. Mimeo, New Economic School.
53.
MasonT. D. (1998). “Take two acres and call me in the morning”: Is land reform a prescription for peasant unrest?Journal of Politics, 60, 199-230.
54.
McAdamD. (1999). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930-1970 (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55.
McClintockC. (1984). Why peasants rebel: The case of Peru’s Sendero Luminoso. World Politics, 37, 48-84.
56.
MigdalJ. S. (1974). Peasants, politics, and revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
MironovB.Man’kovA. (1985). Khlebnye tseny v Rossii za dva stoletiia (XVIII–XIX vv.) [Bread prices in Russia over two centuries (XVIII-XIX centuries)]. Leningrad, Russia: Nauka.
58.
MoonD. (2001a). The bolition of serfdom in Russia. New York, NY: Longman.
59.
MoonD. (2001b). The inventory reform and peasant unrest in right-bank Ukraine in 1847-48. The Slavonic and East European Review, 79, 653-697.
60.
NafzigerS. (2011). Did Ivan’s vote matter? The case of the Zemstvo in Tsarist Russia. European Review of Economic History, 15, 393-441.
61.
Okun’S. (Ed.). (1962). Krest’ianskoe dvizhenie v Rossii v. 1850-1856 gg.: Sbornik dokumentov [The peasant movement in Russia, 1850-1856: Collection of documents]. Moskva, Russia: Izdatel’stvo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi literatury.
62.
Okun’S.SivkovK. (Eds.). (1963). Krest’ianskoe dvizhenie v Rossii v. 1857- mae 1861 gg.: Sbornik dokumentov [The peasant movement in Russia, 1857-May 1861: Collection of documents]. Moskva, Russia: Izdate’stvo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi literatury.
63.
PopkinS. L. (1979). The rational peasant: The political economy of rural society in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.
64.
PrzeworskiA. (2009). Conquered or granted? A history of suffrage extensions. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 291-321.
65.
RobertsonG. B. (2011). The politics of protest in hybrid regimes: Managing dissent in post-communist Russia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
66.
ScottJ. C. (1976). The moral economy of the peasant. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
67.
ScottJ. C. (1987). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
68.
ShleiferA.TreismanD. (2000). Without a map: Political tactics and economic reform in Russia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
SkocpolT. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70.
SkrebnitskiiA. (1865/1866). Krest’ianskoe delo v tsarstvovanie imperatora Aleksandra II: Tom tretii [The peasant affair during the reign of Emperor Alexander II: Volume 3]. Bonn, Germany: Friedrich Kruger Press.
71.
SvolikM. (2012). The politics of authoritarian rule. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
72.
TroinitskiiA. (1861). Krepostnoe naselenie v Rossii, po 10-i narodnoii perepisi: Statisticheskoe issledovanie [The serf population in Russia according to the 10th tax census: Statistical study]. Saint Petersburg, Russia: Karl Vul’f.
73.
ViolaL. (1996). Peasant rebels under Stalin: Collectivization and the culture of peasant resistance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74.
WolfE. R. (1967). Peasant wars of the twentieth century. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
75.
ZaionchkovskiiP. (1958). Provedenie v Zhizn’ Krest’ianskoi Reformy 1861 g [The implementation of the peasant reform of 1861]. Moscow, Russia: Izdatel’stvo Sotsial’no-Ekonomicheskoi Literatury.
76.
ZaionchkovskiiP. (1968). Otmena Krepostnogo Prava v Rossii [The abolition of serfdom in Russia] (3rd ed.). Moscow, Russia: Prosveshchenie.
77.
ZaionchkovskiiP.PainaE. (1968). Krest’ianskoe Dvizhenie v Rossii v. 1870-1880 gg.: Sbornik Dokumentov [The peasant movement in Russia, 1870-1880: Collection of documents]. Moskva, Russia: Nauka.
78.
ZaldM. N. (1991). The continuing vitality of resource mobilization theory: A response to Herbert Kitschelt’s critique. In RuchtD. (Ed.), Research on social movements: The state of the art in Western Europe and the USA (pp. 348-354). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
79.
ZenkovskyS. A. (1961). The emancipation of the serfs in retrospect. Russian Review, 20, 280-293.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
