Previous studies of electoral participation in Latin America have focused on the political and institutional factors that influence country differences in the aggregate level of turnout. This article provides a theoretical and empirical examination of the individual-level factors that have an impact on citizens’ propensity to vote. We test three theoretical perspectives that have been used to explain electoral participation in industrialized democracies (voters’ resources, voters’ motivations, and mobilization networks). Using a series of logistic and hierarchical models, we demonstrate that the demographic characteristics of voters (age and education) and citizens’ insertion in mobilizing networks (civic organizations and the working place) are strong predictors of electoral participation in Latin America. Our analysis also confirms the importance of contextual and institutional variables to explain turnout in the region.
AchenC. H.SinnottR. (2007, April). Taking sides: Learning and voting. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
2.
Alex-AssensohY.AssensohA. B. (2001). Inner-city contexts, church attendance, and African-American political participation. Journal of Politics, 63, 886-901.
3.
BartoliniS. (2000). The political mobilization of the European Left, 1860-1980: The class cleavage. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BirchS. (2010). Perceptions of electoral fairness and voter turnout. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 1601-1622.
5.
BlaisA. (2007). Turnout in elections. In DaltonR. J.KlingemannH.-D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 621-635). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
BoothJ. A.SeligsonM. A. (2009). The sources of political legitimacy. In The legitimacy puzzle: Political support and democracy in Latin America (pp. 105-143). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BradyH. E.VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89, 271-294.
8.
BrattonM.ChuY.-h.LagosM. (2010). Who votes? Implications for new democracies. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 6, 107-136.
9.
CalvoE.MurilloM. V. (2004). Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 742-757.
10.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: Wiley.
11.
CarlinR. E. (2006). The decline of citizen participation in electoral politics in post-authoritarian Chile. Democratization, 13, 632-651.
12.
CarrerasM. (2012). The rise of outsiders in Latin America, 1980-2010: An institutionalist perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 45, 1451-1482.
13.
CoxG. W.MungerM. C. (1989). Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 US house elections. American Political Science Review, 83, 217-231.
14.
CraigS. C.MaggiottoM. A. (1982). Measuring political efficacy. Political Methodology, 8, 85-109.
15.
DesposatoS.NorranderB. (2009). The gender gap in Latin America: Contextual and individual influences on gender and political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 141-162.
16.
DixR. H. (1989). Cleavage structures and party systems in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 22, 23-37.
17.
DoyleD. (2011). The legitimacy of political institutions: Explaining contemporary populism in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 44, 1447-1473.
18.
FornosC. A.PowerT. J.GarandJ. C. (2004). Explaining voter turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000. Comparative Political Studies, 37, 909-940.
19.
FowerakerJ.KrznaricR. (2002). The uneven performance of third wave democracies: Electoral politics and the imperfect rule of law in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 44, 29-60.
20.
GallegoA. (2010). Understanding unequal turnout: Education and voting in comparative perspective. Electoral Studies, 29, 239-248.
21.
GhirardatoP.KatzJ. N. (2002). Indecision theory: Quality of information and voting behavior (Social Science Working Paper 1106R). Pasadena: California Institute of Technology.
22.
GoldsteinH. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
HagopianF. (2005). Conclusions: Government performance, political representation, and public perceptions of contemporary democracy in Latin America. In HagopianF.MainwaringS. P. (Eds.), The third wave of democratization in Latin America: Advances and setbacks (pp. 319-362). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HartlynJ.McCoyJ.MustilloT. M. (2008). Electoral governance matters: Explaining the quality of elections in contemporary Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 73.
25.
Hoffmann-MartinotV. (1994). Voter turnout in French municipal elections. In Lopez-NietoL. (Ed.), Local elections in Europe (pp. 13-42). Barcelona, Spain: Institut de ciènces politiques I socials.
26.
KarpJ. A.BanducciS. A. (2008). Political efficacy and participation in twenty-seven democracies: How electoral systems shape political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 311-334.
27.
KarpJ. A.BanducciS. A.BowlerS. (2007). Getting out the vote: Party mobilization in a comparative perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 91-112.
28.
KarpJ. A.BrockingtonD. (2005). Social desirability and response validity: A comparative analysis of overreporting voter turnout in five countries. Journal of Politics, 67, 825-840.
29.
KlesnerJ. L. (2007). Social capital and political participation in Latin America: Evidence from Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Peru. Latin American Research Review, 42, 1-32.
30.
KostadinovaT.PowerT. J. (2007). Does democratization depress participation? Voter turnout in the Latin American and Eastern European transitional democracies. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 363.
31.
KuenziM.LambrightG. M. S. (2011). Who votes in Africa? An examination of electoral participation in 10 African countries. Party Politics, 17, 767-799.
32.
La Due LakeR.HuckfeldtR. (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19, 567-584.
33.
LehoucqF.WallD. L. (2004). Explaining voter turnout rates in new democracies: Guatemala. Electoral Studies, 23, 485-500.
34.
LeighleyJ. E.NaglerJ. (1992). Individual and systemic influences on turnout: Who votes? 1984. Journal of Politics, 54, 718-740.
35.
LijphartA. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review, 91, 1-14.
36.
NevitteN.BlaisA.GidengilE.NadeauR. (2009). Socioeconomic status and nonvoting: A cross-national comparative analysis. In KlingemannH.-D. (Ed.), The comparative study of electoral systems (pp. 109-136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
NichterS. (2008). Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. American Political Science Review, 102, 19-31.
38.
NiemiR. G.BarkanJ. D. (1987). Age and turnout in new electorates and peasant societies. American Political Science Review, 81, 583-588.
39.
NorrisP. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40.
PatemanC. (1976). Participation and democratic theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
PitkinH. F.ShumerS. M. (1982). On participation. Democracy, 2, 48-53.
43.
RemmerK. L. (2010). Political scale and electoral turnout: Evidence from the less industrialized world. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 275-303.
44.
RobertsK. M. (2002). Social inequalities without class cleavages in Latin America’s neoliberal era. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36, 3-33.
45.
RosenstoneS. J.HansenJ. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York, NY: Longman.
46.
SchuesslerA. A. (2000). A logic of expressive choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
Schwindt-BayerL. A. (2010). Political power and women’s representation in Latin America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48.
SeligsonM. A. (2002). Trouble in paradise? The erosion of system support in Costa Rica, 1978-1999. Latin American Research Review, 37, 160-185.
49.
SmithA. E. (2009). Legitimate grievances: Preferences for democracy, system support, and political participation in Bolivia. Latin American Research Review, 44, 102-126.
50.
SnijdersT. A.BoskerR. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London, England: Sage.
51.
StokesS. C. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99, 315-325.
52.
VerbaS.NieN. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
53.
VerbaS.NieN. H.KimJ.-O. (1978). Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
WolfingerR. E.RosenstoneS. J. (1980). Who votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
