Terrorists attack civilians to coerce their governments into making political concessions. Does this strategy work? To empirically assess the effectiveness of terrorism, the author exploits variation in the target selection of 125 violent substate campaigns. The results show that terrorist campaigns against civilian targets are significantly less effective than guerrilla campaigns against military targets at inducing government concessions. The negative political effect of terrorism is evident across logit model specifications after carefully controlling for tactical confounds. Drawing on political psychology, the author concludes with a theory to account for why governments resist compliance when their civilians are targeted.
AbadieA. (2006). Poverty, political freedom, and the roots of terrorism. American Economic Review, 96, 50-56.
2.
AbrahmsM. (2006a). Al Qaeda’s scorecard: A progress report on Al Qaeda’s objectives. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 29, 509-529.
3.
AbrahmsM. (2006b). Why terrorism does not work. International Security, 31.
4.
AbrahmsM. (2007). Why democracies make superior counterterrorists. Security Studies, 16, 223-253.
5.
AbrahmsM. (2008). What terrorists really want: Terrorist motives and counterterrorism strategy. International Security, 32, 78-105.
6.
ArtR. J.CroninP. M. (2003). The United States and coercive diplomacy. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.
7.
AsalV.RethemeyerR. K. (2008). The nature of the beast: Organizational structures and the lethality of terrorist attacks. Journal of Politics, 70, 437-449.
8.
AtkinsonS. E.SandlerT.TschirhartJ. T. (1987). Terrorism in a bargaining framework. Journal of Law and Economics, 30, 1-21.
9.
AtranS. (2004, August). Trends in suicide terrorism: Sense and nonsense. Paper presented to the World Federation of Scientists’ Permanent Monitoring Panel on Terrorism, Sicily, Italy.
10.
BankoffG. (2003). Regions of risk: Western discourses on terrorism and the significance of Islam. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 26, 413-428.
11.
BatesR.GriefA.LeviM.RosenthalJ. L.WeingastB. R. (1998). Analytic narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
BerrebiC. (2003). Evidence about the link between education, poverty and terrorism among Palestinians (Industrial Relations Section Working Paper, Princeton Series No. 477). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
13.
BerrebiC. (2009). The economics of terrorism and counterterrorism: What matters and is rational choice theory helpful? In DavisP. K.CraginK. (Eds.), Social science for counterterrorism: Putting the pieces together (pp. 170-195). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
14.
BerrebiC.KlorE. F. (2006). On terrorism and electoral outcomes: Theory and evidence from the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 899-925.
15.
BerrebiC.KlorE. F. (2007). The impact of terrorism on voters’ preferences. Unpublished manuscript, RAND. Retrieved from http://igcc3.ucsd.edu/pdf/klor.pdf
16.
BerrebiC.KlorE. F. (2008). Are voters sensitive to terrorism? Direct evidence from the Israeli electorate. American Political Science Review, 102, 279-301.
17.
BiezenI. V. (2005). Terrorism and democratic legitimacy: Conflicting interpretations of the Spanish elections. Mediterranean Politics, 10, 99-108.
18.
BlakeleyG. (2006). It’s politics, stupid! The Spanish general election of 2004. Parliamentary Affairs, 59, 331-349.
19.
BloomM. (2005). Dying to kill: The allure of suicide terrorism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
20.
BuenodeMesquitaE. (2005). The terrorist endgame: A model with moral hazard and learning. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49, 237-258.
21.
BuenodeMesquitaE.DicksonE. (2006). The propaganda of the deed: Terrorism, counterterrorism and mobilization. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 364-81.
22.
BymanD. (2005). Deadly connections: States that sponsor terrorism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23.
BymanD.WaxmanM. (2002). The dynamics of coercion: American foreign policy and the limits of military might. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
ChenowethE.MillerN.McClellanE. (2009). What makes terrorists tick?International Security, 33,180-202.
25.
ChenowethE.StephanM. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York, NY: Columbia Press.
26.
ChowanietzC. (2011). Rallying around the flag or railing against the government? Political parties’ reactions to terrorist acts. Party Politics, 17, 673-698.
27.
CochranK. M.DownesA. B. (2011). It’s a crime, but is it a blunder? The efficacy of targeting civilians in war (Working paper). Durham, NC: Duke University.
28.
CordesB. (1987). When terrorists do the talking: Reflections on terrorist literature. Journal of Strategic Studies, 10, 150-171.
29.
CordesB.HoffmanB.JenkinsB. M.KellenK.MoranS.SaterW. (1984). Trends in international terrorism, 1982 and 1983. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
30.
CordesmanA. H. (2001). Terrorism, asymmetric warfare, and weapons of mass destruction: Defending the U.S. homeland. New York, NY: Praeger.
31.
Correlates of War. (2001). National material capabilities. Urbana, IL: Author.
32.
CrenshawM. (1983). Terrorism, legitimacy, and power: The consequences of political violence. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
33.
CrenshawM. (1988). Theories of terrorism: Instrumental and organizational approaches. In RapoportD. C. (Ed.), Inside terrorist organizations (pp. 13-31). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
34.
CrenshawM. (1990). The logic of terrorism: Terrorist behavior as a product of strategic choice. In ReichW. (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind (pp. 7-24). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
CrenshawM. (2008). The debate over “new” vs. “old” terrorism. In KarawanI. A.McCormackW.ReynoldsS. E. (Eds.), Values and violence: Intangible aspects of terrorism (pp. 117-136). New York, NY: Springer.
37.
CroninA. (2006). How al-Qaida ends: The decline and demise of terrorist groups. International Security, 31, 3-42.
38.
CroninA. (2009a, November). How terrorism ends. Paper prepared for Shaping the Obama Administration’s Counterterrorism Strategy, CATO Institute, Washington, DC.
39.
CroninA. (2009b). How terrorism ends: Understanding the decline and demise of terrorist campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
DavidP. K.CraginK. (2009). Introduction. In DavisP. K.CraginK. (Eds.), Social science for counterterrorism: Putting the pieces together (pp. 1-10). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
41.
DeislerP. F. (2002). A perspective: Risk analysis as a tool for reducing the risks of terrorism. Risk Analysis, 22, 405-413.
42.
DeNardoJ. (1985). Power in numbers: The political strategy of protest and rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
DershowitzA. (2002). Why terrorism works: Understanding the threat, responding to the challenge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
DownesA. B. (2008, March). Killing (civilians) to win? Some preliminary evidence on the military effectiveness of civilian victimization in war. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco, CA.
45.
DrakosK.GofasA. (2006). The devil you know but are afraid to face: Underreporting bias and its distorting effects on the study of terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 714-735.
46.
DreznerD. W. (1998). Conflict expectations and the paradox of economic coercion. International Studies Quarterly, 42, 709-731.
47.
EdwardsA. (2009). Abandoning the armed resistance? The Ulster volunteer force as a case study of strategic terrorism in Northern Ireland. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 32, 146-166.
48.
FearonJ. D. (2005, September). Civil war since 1945: Some facts and a theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
49.
FishmanB. (2006). After al-Zarqawi: The dilemmas and future of al-Qaeda in Iraq. The Washington Quarterly, 29, 19-32.
50.
FortnaP. (2008, August). Terrorism, civil war outcomes, and post-war stability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
51.
GanorB. (2002). Defining terrorism: Is one man’s terrorist another man’s freedom fighter?Police Practice and Research, 3, 287-304.
52.
GeorgeA. (1991). Forceful persuasion: Coercive diplomacy as an alternative to war. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.
53.
GeorgeA.SimonsW. (1994). The limits of coercive diplomacy. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, Inc.
54.
GoodwinJ. (2006). What do we really know about (suicide) terrorism?Sociological Forum, 21, 315-330.
55.
GouldE. D.KlorE. F. (2010). Does terrorism work?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 1459-1510.
56.
GreigM. J. (2005). Stepping into the fray: When do mediators mediate?American Journal of Political Science, 49, 249-266.
GurrT. R. (1988). Empirical research on political terrorism. In SlaterR. O.StolM. (Eds.), Current Perspectives on International Terrorism (pp. 115-154). New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
59.
HartR. A. (2000). Democracy and the successful use of economic sanctions. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 267-284.
60.
HeldV. (1991). Terrorism, rights, and political goals. In FreyR.G.MorrisC.W. (Eds.), Violence, terrorism, and justice, (pp. 59-73). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
HewittC. (1993). Consequences of political violence. Sudbury, MA: Dartmouth.
62.
HoffmanB. (1997). Why terrorists don’t claim credit. Terrorism and Political Violence, 9, 1-6.
63.
HoffmanB. (2006). Inside terrorism (Rev. and exp. ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
64.
HoffmanB. (2011). The rationality of terrorism and other forms of political violence: Lessons from the Jewish campaign in Palestine, 1939-1947. Small wars and insurgencies, 22, 258-272.
65.
HorowitzM.ReiterD. (2001). When does aerial bombing work? Quantitative empirical tests, 1917–1999. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45, 147-173.
66.
HoveydaF. (2005). Dying to Win: The strategic logic of suicide bombing. American Foreign Policy Interests, 27, 535–548.
67.
JenkinsB. M.RubinA. P. (1978). New vulnerabilities and the acquisition of new weapons by nongovernment groups. In EvansS.MurphyJ.F. (Eds.), Legal aspects of international terrorism (pp. 221-276). Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
68.
JentlesonB. (1992). The pretty prudent public: Post-Vietnam American opinion and the use of military force. International Studies Quarterly, 31, 49-74.
69.
JohnstonP. (2009). The military effectiveness of civilian targeting in counterinsurgency. Unpublished manuscript.
70.
JonesS. G.LibickiM. C. (2008). How terrorist groups end: Lessons for countering Al Qa’ida. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
71.
KalyvasS. N. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
72.
KellyM. J.MitchellH. T. (1984). Transnational terrorism and the western elite press. Political Communication and Persuasion, 1, 269–96.
73.
KantI. (1795). Perpetual peace: A philosophical sketch. In ReissH. (Ed.), Kant’sPolitical Writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press, 1970.
74.
KocherM.PepinskyT.KalyvasS. N. (2011). Aerial bombing and counterinsurgency in the Vietnam war. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 201-218.
75.
KyddA. H.WalterB. F. (2002). Sabotaging the peace: The politics of extremist violence. International Organization, 56, 263-296.
76.
KyddA. H.WalterB. F. (2006). The strategies of terrorism. International Security, 31, 49-79.
77.
LagoI.MonteroJ. R. (2006). The 2004 election in Spain: Terrorism, accountability, and voting. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 2, 13-36.
78.
LakeD. A. (2002). Rational extremism: Understanding terrorism in the twenty-first century. Dialog-IO, 1, 15-29.
79.
LapanH. E.SandlerT. (1993). Terrorism and signaling. European Journal of Political Economy, 9, 383-397.
LyallJ. (2009). Does indiscriminate violence incite insurgent attacks? Evidence from Chechnya. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53, 331-362.
82.
LyallJ. (2010). Do democracies make inferior counterinsurgents? Reassessing democracy’s impact on war outcomes and duration. International Organization, 64, 167-192.
83.
MarinovN. (2005). Do economic sanctions destabilize country leaders?American Journal of Political Science, 49, 564-576.
84.
McCormickG. H. (2003). Terrorist decision-making. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 473-507.
85.
MearsheimerJ. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York, NY: Norton.
86.
MoghadamA. (2006). Suicide terrorism, occupation, and the globalization of martyrdom: A critique of dying to win. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 29, 707-729.
87.
MortonR. B. (1999). Methods and models: A guide to the empirical analysis of formal models in political science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
88.
MuellerJ. (2006). Overblown: How politicians and the terrorism industry inflate national security threats, and why we believe them. New York, NY: Free Press.
89.
NewmanE. (2006). Exploring the “root causes” of terrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 29, 749-772.
90.
NolanC. J. (2002). Greenwood encyclopedia of international relations. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
91.
NoricksD. M. E. (2009). The root causes of terrorism. Social science for counterterrorism: Putting the pieces together (pp. 11-68). Santa Monica, Calif: RAND.
92.
OvergaardP. B. (1994). The scale of terrorist attacks as a signal of resources. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38, 452-478.
93.
PapeR. A. (1996). Bombing to win: Air power and coercion in war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
94.
PapeR. A. (1997). Why economic sanctions do not work. International Security, 22, 90-136.
95.
PapeR. A. (2003). The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. American Political Science Review, 97.
96.
PapeR. A. (2005). Dying to win: The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. New York, NY: Random House.
97.
PiazzaJ. A. (2006). Rooted in poverty? Terrorism, poor economic development, and social cleavages. Terrorism and Political Violence, 18, 159-177.
98.
PiazzaJ. A. (2008). A supply-side view of suicide terrorism: A cross-national study. Journal of Politics, 20, 28-39.
99.
PiazzaJ. A. (2009). Is Islamist terrorism more dangerous? An empirical study of group ideology, organization, and goal structure. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21, 62-88.
100.
PolkW. R. (2007). Violent politics: A history of insurgency, terrorism and guerrilla war from the American revolution to Iraq. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
101.
RapoportD. C. (2004). The four waves of modern terrorism. In CroninA. K.LudesJ. M. (Eds.), Attacking terrorism: Elements of a grand strategy (pp. 46–73). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
102.
RigoE. O. (2005). Aznar’s political failure or punishment for supporting the Iraq war? Hypotheses about the causes of the 2004 Spanish election results. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 610-615.
103.
RoseW.MurphyR. (2007). Correspondence: Does terrorism ever work? The 2004 Madrid train bombings. International Security, 32, 185-192.
104.
RoseW.RysiaM.AbrahmsM. (2007). Correspondence: Does terrorism ever work? The 2004 Madrid train bombings. International Security, 32, 185-192.
105.
RothmanJ.OlsonM. L. (2001). From interests to identities: Towards a new emphasis in interactive conflict resolution. Journal of Peace Research, 38, 289-305.
106.
SambanisN. (2008). Terrorism and civil war. In KeeferP.LoayzaN. (Eds.), Terrorism, economic development, and political openness (pp. 174-206). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
107.
SchellingT. C. (1966). Arms and influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
108.
SchellingT. C. (1991). What purposes can international terrorism serve? In FreyR. G.MorrisC. W. (Eds.), Violence, terrorism, and justice (pp. 21-32). New York, NY: Cambridge.
109.
SchmidA. P.deGraafJ. (1982). Violence as communication: Insurgent terrorism and the western news media. Beverly Hills CA: SAGE.
110.
SchmidA. P.JongmanA. J. (2005). Political terrorism: A new guide to actors, authors, concepts, data bases, theories and literature. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
111.
SilkeA. (2003). Terrorists, victims, and society. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
112.
SinghJ. V.TuckerD. J.HouseR. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 171-193.
113.
SmithA. (1996). The success and use of economic sanctions. International Interactions, 21, 229-245.
