Much has been said about the institutional determinants of transitional justice (TJ), yet scholars still know little about the determinants of citizens’ attitudes toward restorative policies aimed at addressing human rights violations of the past. This article draws on an original survey of a representative sample of Spanish citizens conducted in 2008. One year earlier, the Spanish socialist government had approved the so-called Law of Historical Memory, aimed at providing restitution for victims of the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) and the Francoist dictatorship (1939-1975). We analyze individual-level attitudes toward a set of TJ policies (i.e., truth commissions, trials, and symbolic reparations) in a comprehensive overview of the field. We study the effects of different sets of variables: individual sociodemographic and ideological factors, family and socialization variables, and context-related factors. Individual ideology, family victimization during the dictatorship, and regional context appear highly relevant in explaining individual attitudes toward TJ policies.
AcockA.BengtsonV. L. (1980). Socialization and attribution: Actual versus perceived similarity among parents and youth. Journal of Marriage and Family, 42, 501-515.
2.
AguilarP. (2002). Memory and amnesia: The role of the Spanish Civil War in the transition to democracy. Oxford, NY: Berghahn Books.
3.
AguilarP. (2008a). Políticas de la memoria y memorias de la política [Politics of Memory and Memories of Politics]. Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.
4.
AguilarP. (2008b). Transitional or post-transitional justice? Recent developments in the Spanish Case. South European Society and Politics, 13, 417-433.
5.
ArjonaA. (2009). One national war, multiple local orders: An inquiry into the unit of analysis of war and post-war interventions. In BergsmoM.KalmanovitzP. (Eds.), Law in peace negotiations (pp. 123-150). Oslo, Norway: FICJC Publications 2, Peace Research Institute.
6.
BackerD. (2003). Civil society and transitional justice: Possibilities, patterns and prospects. Journal of Human Rights, 2, 297-313.
7.
BalcellsL. (2007, August). The effects of wars on political identities: Ideological change and continuity after the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
8.
Barahona de BritoA.González-EnríquezC.AguilarP. (Eds.). (2001). The politics of memory: Transitional justice in democratizing societies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
BeckP. A.JenningsM. K. (1991). Family traditions, political periods, and the development of Partisan orientations. Journal of Politics, 53, 742-763.
10.
BellowsJ.MiguelE. (2008). War and collective action in Sierra Leone (Working paper). Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley.
11.
BiroM.AjdukovicD.CorkaloD.DjipaD.MilinP.WeinsteinH. M. (2004). Attitudes toward justice and social reconstruction in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. In StroverE.WeinsteinH. M. (Eds.), My neighbor, my enemy: Justice and community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity (pp. 183-205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CarmilD.BreznitzS. (1990). Personal trauma and world view—Are extremely stressful experiences related to political attitudes, religious beliefs, and future orientation?Journal of Traumatic Stress, 4, 393-405.
13.
DalhouseM.FrideresJ. S. (1996). Intergenerational congruency: The role of the family in political attitudes of youth. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 227-248.
14.
DavidR.ChoiS. Y. (2006). Forgiveness and transitional justice in the Czech Republic. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 339-367.
15.
DavisM. (2005). Is Spain recovering its memory? Breaking the Pacto del Olvido. Human Rights Quarterly, 27, 858-880.
16.
De GreiffP. (n.d.). Theorizing transitional justice. Unpublished manuscript.
17.
ElsterJ. (1998). Coming to terms with the past: A framework for the study of justice in the transition to democracy. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 39(1), 7-48.
18.
ElsterJ. (2004). Closing the books: Transitional justice in historical perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
ElsterJ. (Ed.). (2006). Retribution and reparation in the transition to democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Espinoza CuevasV.Ortiz RojasM. L.Rojas BaezaP. (2003). Comisiones de la verdad. ¿Un camino incierto? [Truth Commissions. An uncertain path?] Santiago, Chile: Corporación de Promoción y Defensa de los Derechos del Pueblo.
21.
FerreiraE. F. (1999). Mujeres, memoria e identidad política [Women, memory and political identity]. Historia, Antropología y Fuente Oral, 21, 53-66.
22.
GibsonJ. L. (2002). Truth, justice, and reconciliation: Judging the fairness of Amnesty in South Africa. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 540-556.
23.
GibsonJ. L. (2004a). Does truth lead to reconciliation? Testing the causal assumptions of the South African truth and reconciliation process. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 201-217.
24.
GibsonJ. L. (2004b). Overcoming apartheid: Can truth reconcile a divided nation?New York, NY: Russell Sage.
25.
GibsonJ. L. (2007). “Truth” and “reconciliation” as social indicators. Social Indicators Research, 81, 257-281.
26.
GrodskyB. (2008). Weighing the costs of accountability: The role of institutional incentives in pursuing transitional justice. Journal of Human Rights, 7, 353-375.
27.
GrodskyB. (2009). Re-ordering justice: Towards a new methodological approach to studying transitional justice. Journal of Peace Research, 46, 1-19.
28.
International Center for Transitional Justice. (2004, May). Iraqi voices: Attitudes toward transitional justice and social reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California.
29.
International Center for Transitional Justice. (2008, August). Living with fear: A population-based survey on attitudes about peace, justice and social reconstruction in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Human Rights Center.
30.
JenningsM. K.NiemiR. G. (1974). The political character of adolescence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
JenningsM. K.NiemiR. G. (1981). Generations and politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
JenningsM. K.StokerJ.BowersJ. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. Journal of Politics, 71, 782-799.
33.
JuliáS. (Ed.). (2004). Víctimas de la Guerra Civil [Victims of the Civil War]. Madrid, Spain: Temas de Hoy.
34.
KooningsK.KruijtD. (Eds.). (1999). Societies of fear: The legacy of civil war, violence and terror in Latin America. London, UK: Zed Books.
35.
KritzN. J. (Ed.). (1995). Transitional justice: How emerging democracies reckon with former regimes. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
36.
MaravallJ. M. (1978). Dictatorship and political dissent: Workers and students in Franco’s Spain. London, UK: Tavistock.
37.
Martín BeristainC. (2008). Diálogos sobre la reparación. Experiencias en el sistema interamericano de derechos humanos [Dialogues about reparation. Experiences in the Interamerican System of Human Rights]. San José, Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos.
38.
McAdamsJ. A. (Ed.). (1997). Transitional justice and the rule of law in new democracies. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
39.
MillerR. B.GlassJ. (1989). Parent–child attitude similarity across the life course. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 991-997.
40.
MonteroJ. R.CalvoK.MartínezA. (2008). El voto religioso en España y Portugal [Religious voting in Spain and Portugal]. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 51, 19-54.
41.
NalepaM. (2007, April). Procedural fairness and demand for transitional justice: Evidence from East Central Europe. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
42.
NalepaM. (2008). To punish the guilty and protect the innocent: Comparing truth revelation procedures. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2, 221-245.
43.
NalepaM. (2010). Skeletons in the closet: Transitional justice in post-communist Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44.
PayneLeighTriciaOlsenAndrewReiter (2008, March). Does transitional justice work?Paper presented at the International Studies Association Convention, San Francisco, CA.
45.
SheridanE. (2009, April). Transitional justice and the American South. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
46.
SkaarE. (1999). Truth commissions, trials or nothing. Third World Quarterly, 20, 1109-1128.
47.
StroverE.WeinsteinH. M. (Eds.). (2004). My neighbor, my enemy: Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity. Cambridge: UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
StyskalR. A.SullivanH. J. (1975). Intergenerational continuity and congruence on political values. Political Research Quarterly, 28, 516-527.
49.
TeitelR. (2000). Transitional justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
50.
TheidonK. (2006). The micropolitics of reconciliation in postwar Peru. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 433-457.
51.
ThomsO.RonJ.ParisR. (2008). The effects of transitional justice mechanisms (CIPS working paper). Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa.
52.
WittenbergJ. (2006). Crucibles of political loyalty: Church institutions and electoral continuity in Hungary. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
53.
WoodE. (2008). The social processes of civil war: The wartime transformation of social networks. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 539-561.
