In this article the authors develop a new approach to the study of policy dynamics in a quasi-federal system of government. The goal is to contribute to previous research on comparative federalism by analyzing the variations of issue attention between levels of government and across four regional governments—Andalusia, Catalonia, Galicia, and the Basque Country. To do so the authors follow the policy dynamics approach, developing a comparative and empirical analysis about issue attention across time, territories, and policy subsystems. The analysis relies on an extensive database, created following the methodology of the Comparative Agendas Project, which includes all laws passed from the early 1980s to present. The results indicate that legislative agendas have become increasingly diverse since the 1990s, and this is partly explained by party preferences and the type of government.
AdlerE. S.WilkersonJ. (2008). Intended consequences? Jurisdictional reform and issue control in the U.S. House of representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 33, 85-114.
2.
Aguilera de PratC. (2001). La transición Política en España [The Political Transition in Spain, in Politics and Government in Spain]. In AlcántaraManuelMartínezAntonia (Eds.), Política y Gobierno en España (pp. 39-56). Valencia, Spain: Tirant lo Blanc.
3.
AjaE. (2003). El Estado Autonómico [The Autonomic State]. Madrid, Spain: Alianza.
4.
AldrichJ. (1995). Why parties? The origin and transformation of party politics in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BaumgartnerF.BrouardS.GrossmanE. (2009). Agenda-setting dynamics in France: Revisiting the partisan hypothesis. French Politics, 7(2), 75-95.
6.
BaumgartnerF.JonesB. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BaumgartnerF.JonesB.WilkersonJ. (2011) . Comparative Studies of Policy Dynamics. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 947-972.
8.
BlaisA.BlakeD.DionS. (1993). Do parties make a difference? Parties and the size of government in liberal democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 40-62.
9.
BoixC. (2000). Partisan governments, the international economy, and macroeconomic policies in advanced nations, 1960-1993. World Politics, 53, 38-73.
10.
BörzelT. (2002). States and regions in the European Union: Institutional adaptation in Germany and Spain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BrouardS.WilkersonJ.BaumgartnerF. R.TimmermansA.BevanS.BreemanG.LoweryD. (2009). Comparer les Productions Législatives: Enjeux et Methodes [Comparing Legislative Productions: Questions and Methods]. Revue International de Politique Comparée, 16, 381-404.
12.
BudgeI.HofferbertR. I. (1990). Mandates and policy outputs: US party platforms and federal expenditures. American Political Science Review, 84, 111-131.
13.
CapoJ. (2003). The Spanish parliament in a triangular relationship, 1982-2000. Journal of Legislative Studies, 9, 107-129.
14.
ChaquésL.PalauA. M. (2011). Are Spanish policy-makers responding to citizens’ priorities?West European Politics. (Forthcoming).
15.
ChaquésL.PalauA. M.MuñozL.WilkersonJ. D. (2008). Comparing governmental agendas: Evolution of the prioritization of issues in the USA and Spain (IBEI working papers). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1159670
16.
De MiguelJ. (2002). Leyes de CCAA sobre [Laws of CCAA on Universities]. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, 25, 131-153.
17.
ErkJ. (2006). Does federalism really matter?Comparative Politics, 39, 103-120.
18.
FilippovM.OrdeshookP.ShvetsovaO. (2004). Designing federalism: A theory of self-sustainable federal institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GordinJ. P. (2006). Testing Riker’s party-based theory of federalism: The Argentine case. Journal of Federalism, 34, 21-34.
20.
Green-PedersenC. H. (2006). Long-term changes in Danish party politics: The rise and importance of issue competition. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29, 219-235.
21.
GuntherR.MonteroJ. R. (2009). The politics of Spain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HoboltS.KlemmemsenR. (2008). Government responsiveness and political competition in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 309-337.
23.
HoogheL.GaryM.SchakelA. H. (2010). The rise of regional authority: A comparative study of 42 democracies (1950-2006). London, UK: Routledge.
24.
JonesB. D.BaumgartnerF. R. (2005). The politics of attention. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
LinzJ.StepanA. (2006). The paradigmatic case of Reforma Pactada-Ruptura Pactada: Spain. In LinzJuanStepanAlfred (Eds.), Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe (pp. 87-115). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
López NietoL. (2001). Las Cortes Generales [The Spanish Parliament in Politics and Government in Spain]. In AlcántaraManuelMartínezAntonia (Eds.), Política y Gobierno en España. Valencia, Spain: Tirant lo Blanc.
28.
MorataF. (1992). Institucionalización y rendimiento político del Estado Autonómico [Institutionalization and political performance of the Autonomic State]. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 76, 255-297.
29.
PorrasA. (2002). La actividad legislativa de los Parlamentos autonómicos 1980-2000: Agenda legislativa y mapa normativo [Legislative Activities of the Autonomic Parliaments, in... Twenty Years of Autonomic Government in Spain]. In SubiratsJoanGallegoRaquel (Eds.), Veinte Años de Autonomías en España (pp. 167-203). Madrid, Spain: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
30.
RequejoF.CaminalM. (2010). Political liberalism and plurinational democracies. London, UK: Routledge.
31.
SchmidtM. G. (1996). When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research, 30, 155-183.
32.
SorokaS. N.WlezienC. H. (2010). Degrees of democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
TezanosJ. F.CotareloR.de BlasA. (1993). La transición Democrática Española [The Spanish Democratic Transition]. Madrid, Spain: Sistema.
34.
WibbelsE. (2003). Federalism and the market: Intergovernmental conflict and economic reform in the developing world. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
WibbelsE. (2006). Madison in Bagdad? Decentralization and federalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 165-188.
