How do electoral systems influence citizens’ perceptions of government responsiveness? It is well known that although majoritarian electoral systems emphasize the directness and clarity of the connection between voters and policy makers, proportional representation systems facilitate the representation of all factions in society. Although there have been a few studies of the direct influence of electoral systems on popular attitudes about the political system, the results have not been consistent. The author finds, however, that election systems also affect perceptions of government responsiveness, but the relationship is highly contingent on the degree of ethnic diversity in a society. Using Afrobarometer survey data collected from 15 sub-Saharan African countries, along with contextual variables, this multilevel analysis finds that at lower levels of ethnic diversity, majoritarian electoral systems are much better at boosting citizens’ external efficacy, whereas at higher levels of ethnic diversity, proportional representation systems are more likely to elevate efficacy. The findings have important implications for constitutional design and democratic consolidation.
Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 762-800.
2.
Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. ( 1989). External debt, capital fight and political risk. Journal of International Economics, 27, 199-220.
3.
Almond, G.A., & Verba, S. ( 1989). The civic culture. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
4.
Anderson, C.J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. ( 2005). Losers’ consent. New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
5.
Anderson, C.J., & Guillory, C. ( 1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review, 91, 66-81.
6.
Anderson, C.J., & Tverdova, Y.V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 91-109.
7.
Balch, G.I. ( 1974). Multiple indicators in survey research. Political Methodology, 1, 1-43.
8.
Barkan, J.D. ( 1998). Rethinking the applicability of proportional representation for Africa. In T. D. Sisk & A. Reynolds (Eds.), Elections and conflict management in Africa (pp. 57-70). Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
9.
Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P., & Walsh, P. ( 2001). New tools in comparative economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review, 15, 165-176.
10.
Bratton, M. ( 2006). Poor people and democratic citizenship in Africa (Afrobarometer Working Paper 56). Retrieved from www.afrobarometer.org
11.
Bratton, M., Mattes, R., & Gyimah-Boadi, E. (2005). Public opinion, democracy, and market reform in Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Bratton, M., & van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic experiments in Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Chandra, K. ( 2001). Cumulative findings in the study of ethnic politics. APSA-CP, 12, 7-11.
14.
Cho, W., & Bratton, M. ( 2006). Electoral institutions, partisan status, and political support in Lesotho. Electoral Studies, 25, 731-750.
15.
Clark, H., Dutt, N., & Kornberg, A. ( 1993). The political economy of attitudes toward polity and society in WesternEuropean countries. Journal of Politics , 55, 998-1021.
16.
Collier, P. ( 1998, April). The political economy of ethnicity. Paper prepared at the annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC.
17.
Easterly, W., & Levine, R. ( 1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions . Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1203-1250.
18.
Easton, D. ( 1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York, NY: John Wiley.
19.
Eller, J.D., & Coughlan, R.M. (1993). The poverty of primordialism: The demystification of ethnic attachments. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16, 183-201.
20.
Horowitz, D.L. ( 1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley : University of California Press.
21.
Horowitz, D.L. ( 1991). A democratic South Africa?New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Horowitz, D. ( 2003). Electoral systems: A primer for decision maker. Journal of Democracy, 14, 115-127.
23.
Joseph, R. (Ed.). (1999). State, conflict, and democracy in Africa. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
24.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. ( 1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15, 222-279.
25.
Lijphart, A. ( 2004). Constitutional design for divided societies. Journal of Democracy, 15, 96-109.
26.
Lijphart, A. ( 1999). Patterns of democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Linz, J.J., & Stepan, A. ( 1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
Mass, C., & Hox, J. ( 2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86-92.
29.
Mattes, R., & Gouws, A. ( 1999). Race, ethnicity, and voting behavior: Lesson from South Africa. In T. D. Sisk & A. Reynolds (Eds.), Elections and conflict management in Africa (pp. 119-142). Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
30.
Mozaffar, S., Scarritt, J.R., & Galaich, G. ( 2003). Electoral institutions, ethnopolitical cleavages, and party systems in Africa’s emerging democracies. American Political Science Review, 97, 379-390.
31.
Neto, O., & Cox, G.W. ( 1997). Electoral institutions, cleavage structures, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 149-174.
32.
Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizen: Global support for democratic governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
North, D.C. ( 1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Ordeshook, P.C., & Shvetsova, O.V. (1994). Ethnic heterogeneity, district magnitude, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 100-123.
35.
Posner, D. ( 2004). Measuring ethnic fractionalization in Africa. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 849-863.
36.
Posner, D. ( 2005). Institutions and ethnic politics in African. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Powell, B.G. ( 2000). Election as instruments of democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
Rae, D.W. ( 1967). The political consequences of electoral laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Reilly, B. ( 1997). The alternative vote and ethnical accommodation: New evidence from Papua New Guinea. Electoral Studies, 16, 1-12.
41.
Reynolds, A. ( 1998). Election in Southern Africa. In T. D. Sisk & A. Reynolds (Eds.), Elections and conflict management in Africa (pp. 71-80). Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
42.
Reynolds, A. ( 1999). Electoral systems and democratization in southern Africa . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
Riker, W. ( 1980). Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions. American Political Science Review, 74, 432-446.
44.
Rohrschneider, R. ( 2002). The democracy deficit and mass support for an EU-wide government. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 463-475.
45.
Sartori, G. ( 1997). Comparative constitutional engineering: An inquiry into structures, incentives, and outcomes. London, UK: Macmillan.
46.
Shugart, M. S., & Wattenberg, M. P. (Eds.). (2000). Mixed-member electoral systems: The best of both worlds?New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47.
Steenbergen, M.R., & Jones, B.S. ( 2002). Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 218-237.
48.
Weatherford, S. ( 1987). How does government performance influence political support ? Political Behavior, 9, 5-28.
49.
Weatherford, S. ( 1991). Mapping the ties that bind: legitimacy, representation and alienation. Western Political Quarterly, 44, 682-706.
50.
Weatherford, S. ( 1992). Measuring political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 86, 149-166.
