Voters who participate in elections to the European Parliament (EP) apparently use these elections to punish their domestic governing parties. Many students of the EU therefore claim that the party—political composition of the Parliament should systematically differ from that of the EU Council. This study shows that opposed majorities between council and parliament may have other than simply electoral causes. The logic of domestic government formation works against the representation of more extreme and EU-skeptic parties in the Council, whereas voters in EP elections vote more often for these parties. The different locations of Council and Parliament are therefore caused by two effects: a mechanical effect—relevant for the composition of the Council—when national votes are translated into office and an electoral effect in European elections. The article discusses the implications of this finding for our understanding of the political system of the EU and of its democratic legitimacy.
Aspinwall, M.D. (2002). Preferring Europe: Ideology and national preferences onEuropean Integration. European Union Politics, 1(3), 81-111.
2.
Bartolini, S. (2005). Restructuring Europe: Centre formation, system building and political structuring between the nation-state and the European Union. Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bartolini, S. (2006). Should the Union be "politicised"? Prospects and risks (Policy Paper No. 19). Paris: Notre Europe.
4.
Caramani, D. (2006). Is there a European electorate and what does it look like? Evidence from electoral volatility measures, 1976-2004. West European Politics, 29(1), 1-27.
5.
Colomer, J.M. (2001). Political institutions: Democracy and social choice . Oxford, UK/ New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Corbett, R., Jacobs, F., & Shackleton, M. (2003). European Parliament. London: LinkHarper.
7.
Craig, P. (2004). The constitutional treaty: Legislative and executive power in the emerging constitutional order (EUI Working Paper Law 2004/7). San DomenicoEuropean University Institute.
8.
Döring, H. (2007). The composition of the College of Commissioners: Patterns of delegation. European Union Politics, 8(2), 209-230.
9.
Eijk, C. v. d., & Franklin, M.N. (1996). Choosing Europe? The European electorate and national politics in the face of union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Farrell, D.M., & Scully, R. (2005). Electing the European Parliament: How uniform are uniform electoral systems? Journal of Common Market Studies , 43(5), 969-984.
11.
Ferrara, F., & Weishaupt, J.T. (2004). Get your act together: Party performance in European Parliament elections. European Union Politics, 5(3), 283-306.
12.
Gross, D.A., & Sigelman, L. (1984). Comparing party systems: A multidimensional approach . Comparative Politics, 16(4), 463-479.
13.
Hix, S. (2005). The political system of the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
Hix, S., Noury, A., & Roland, G. (2005). Power to the parties: Cohesion and competition in the European Parliament, 1979-2001. British Journal of Political Science, 35(2), 209-234.
15.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (in press). A postfunctional theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science.
16.
Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C.J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965-989.
17.
Kedar, O. (2005). When moderate voters prefer extreme parties: Policy balancing in parliamentary elections. American Political Science Review, 99(2), 185-199.
18.
Koepke, J.R., & Ringe, N. (2006). The second-order election model in an enlarged Europe. European Union Politics, 7(3), 321-346.
19.
Kousser, T. (2004). Retrospective voting and strategic behavior in European Parliament elections. Electoral Studies, 23(1), 1-21.
20.
Krehbiel, K. (1998). Pivotal politics: A theory of U.S. lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Kreppel, A. (2000). Rules, ideology, and coalition formation in the European Parliament: Past, present, and future. European Union Politics, 1(3), 340-362.
22.
Kreppel, A., & Hix, S. (2003). From "grand coalition" to left-right confrontation: Explaining the shifting structure of party competition in theEuropean Parliament. Comparative Political Studies, 36(1/2), 75-96.
23.
Kriesi, H. (2007). The role of European integration in national election campaigns. European Union Politics, 8(1), 83-108.
24.
Laver, M., & Shepsle, K.A. (1996). Making and breaking governments: Cabinets and legislatures in parliamentary democracies. Cambridge, UK /New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Mackie, T., & Rose, R. (1991). The international almanac of electoral history . Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
26.
Manow, P., Schäfer, A., & Zorn, H. (in press). Europe's party-political center of gravity, 1957-2003. Journal of European Public Policy.
27.
Marks, G. (2007). Comparing measures of party positioning: Expert, manifesto, and survey data [Special symposium]. Electoral Studies, 26(1).
28.
Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Steenbergen, M.R., & Bakker, R. (2007). Cross-validating data on party positioning onEuropean integration. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 23-38.
29.
Marks, G., & Steenbergen, M. (2002). Understanding political contestation in theEuropean Union. Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 879-892.
30.
Marsh, M. (1998). Testing the second-order election model after fourEuropean elections. British Journal of Political Science , 28(4), 591-607.
31.
Martin, L.W., & Stevenson, R.T. (2001). Government formation in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science , 45(1), 33-50.
32.
Mattila, M. (2004). Contested decisions: Empirical analysis of voting in the European Union Council of Ministers. European Journal of Political Research, 43(1), 29-50.
33.
McDonald, M.D., & Budge, I. (2005). Elections, parties, democracy: Conferring the median mandate. Oxford, UK/New York : Oxford University Press.
34.
McElroy, G., & Benoit, K. (2007). Party groups and policy positions in theEuropean Parliament. Party Politics, 13(1), 5-28.
35.
Moravcsik, A. (2002). In defence of the "democratic deficit": Reassessing legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 603-624.
36.
Pollack, M.A. (2003). The engines of European integration: Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the EU. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37.
Powell, G.B. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy: Majoritarian and proportional visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
Powell, G.B. (2006). Election laws and representative governments: Beyond votes and seats. British Journal of Political Science , 36(2), 291-315.
39.
Reif, K. (1984). National electoral cycles and European elections 1979 and 1984. Electoral Studies, 3(3), 244-255.
40.
Reif, K. (1997). European elections as member state second-order elections revisited. European Journal of Political Research , 31(1/2), 115-124.
41.
Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual-framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3-44.
42.
Ringe, N. (2005). Government-opposition dynamics in the European Union: The Santer Commission resignation crisis. European Journal of Political Research, 44(5), 671-696.
43.
Tsebelis, G., & Garrett, G. (2001). The institutional foundations of intergovernmentalism and supranationalism in theEuropean Union. International Organization, 55(2), 357-390.
44.
Warwick, P.V. (1996). Coalition government membership in West European parliamentary democracies. British Journal of Political Science , 26(4), 471-499.
45.
Woldendorp, J., Keman, H., & Budge, I. (2000). Party government in 48 democracies (1945-1998): Composition-Duration-Personnel. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
