One of the most significant and unexpected developments in Latin America during the past 10 years is the emergence of parties organized around indigenous identity. The authors use subnational data from six South American countries (Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela) to examine the factors responsible for the variation in the emergence and performance of indigenous peoples’ political parties in the region. Using a pooled cross-sectional twin snapshot analysis, the authors find that although indigenous party formation is the result of favorable institutional, demographic, and political conditions, such as permissive electoral rules, optimal indigenous population size, and a regional diffusion effect with respect to indigenous activism, enhanced electoral performance of these parties is determined by structural and political conditions, including higher rates of poverty and less salient class-based identities, in addition to the favorable conditions mentioned above.
Albó, Xavier. (1996). Andean people in the twentieth century. In Frank Salomon & Stuart B. Schwartz (Eds.), The Cambridge history of the native peoples of the Americas. Vol. III, South America, part 2 (pp. 765-871). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Albó, Xavier. (2002). Pueblos Indios en la Política [Indian peoples in politics]. La Paz, Bolivia: Centro de Investigación y Promoción del Campesinado.
3.
Andolina, Robert. (1999). Colonial legacies and plurinational imaginaries: Indigenous movement politics in Ecuador and Bolivia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
4.
Beck, Scott H., & Mijeski, Kenneth J. (2001). Barricades and ballots: Ecuador’s Indians and the Pachakutik political movement. Ecuadorian Studies, 1(Sept.). Available at www.ecuatorianistas.org/journal/1/1.html.
5.
Beck, Scott H., & Mijeski, Kenneth J. (2004). Ecuador’s Indians in the 1996 and 1998 elections: Assessing Pachakutik’s performance. Latin Americanist, 67(3/4), 46-74.
6.
Bengoa, José. (1999). Historia de Un Conflicto: El Estado y los Mapuches en el Siglo XX [History of a conflict: The state and the Mapuches in the 20th century]. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Planeta.
7.
Bengoa, José. (2000). La Emergencia Indígena en América Latina [The indigenous emergence in Latin America]. Santiago, Chile: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
8.
Birnir, Jóhanna Kristín. (in press). Ethnicity and electoral politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Birnir, Jóhanna Kristín. (2004). In press. Disunity and diversity: Party system fragmentation and the dynamic effect of ethnic heterogeneity in Latin America. Latin American Research Review.
10.
Birnir, Jóhanna Kristin, & Van Cott, Donna Lee. (2004, October). Disunity in diversity: Party system fragmentation and ethnic heterogeneity in Latin America. Paper presented at the international meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Las Vegas, NV.
11.
Brysk, Alison. (2000). From tribal village to global village: Indian rights and international relations in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
Chandra, Kanchan. (2004). Why ethnic parties succeed: Patronage and ethnic head counts in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Chhibber, Pradeep. (1999). Democracy without associations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14.
Chiriboga, Manuel, & Rivera, Fredy. (1989). Elecciones de enero 1988 y participación indígena [January 1988 elections and indigenous participation]. Ecuador Debate, 17, 181-221.
15.
Collins, Jennifer N. (2001, September). Opening up electoral politics: Political crisis and the rise of Pachakutik. Paper presented at international meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Washington, DC.
16.
Coppedge, Michael. (1997a). A classification of Latin American political parties (Kellogg Institute Working Paper No. 244). Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University, Kellogg Institute.
17.
Coppedge, Michael. (1997b). District magnitude, economic performance, and party-system fragmentation in five Latin American countries. Comparative Political Studies, 30(2), 156-185.
18.
Cox, Gary W. (1997). Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Dalton, Russell L., Flanagan, Scott C., & Beck, Paul Allen. (Eds.). (1984). Electoral change in advanced industrial democracies: Realignment or dealignment?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Deruyttere, Anne. (1997). Indigenous peoples and sustainable development. The role of the Inter-American Development Bank. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
22.
Europa Publications Limited. (1994). Europa world year book (Vols. 1 & 2). London: Europa Publications.
23.
Harmel, Robert, & Robertson, John D. (1985). Formation and success of new parties: A cross-national analysis. International Political Science Review, 6(4), 501-523.
24.
Horowitz, Donald. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
Htun, Mala. (2004). From “racial democracy” to affirmative action: Changing state policy on race in Brazil. Latin American Research Review, 39(1), 60-89.
26.
Hug, Simon. (2001). Altering party systems: Strategic behavior and the emergence of new political parties in Western democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
27.
Jones, Mark P. (1997). Racial heterogeneity and the effective number of candidates in majority runoff elections: Evidence from Louisiana. Electoral Studies, 16(3), 349-358.
Kitschelt, Herbert. (1989). The logics of party formation: Ecological politics in Belgium and West Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
31.
Laakso, Murkuu, & Taagepera, Rein. (1979). Effective number of parties. A measure with application to western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12, 3-27.
32.
Levitsky, Steven. (1999). Fujimori and post-party politics in Peru. Journal of Democracy, 10(3), 78-92.
33.
Levitsky, Steven, & Cameron, Maxwell A. (2001, September). Democracy without parties? Political parties and regime collapse in Fujimori’s Peru. Paper presented at the international meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Washington, DC.
34.
Lipset, Seymour Martin, & Rokkan, Stein. (Eds.). (1967). International yearbook of political behavior research (vol.7). New York: Free Press.
35.
Lucero, José Antonio. (2002). Arts of unification: Political representation and indigenous movements in Bolivia and Ecuador. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, Department of Politics, Princeton, NJ.
36.
Madrid, Raúl. (2005a). Ethnic cleavages and electoral volatility in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 38(1), 1-20.
37.
Madrid, Raúl. (2005b). Indigenous voters and party system fragmentation in Latin America. Electoral Studies, 24(4), 689-707.
38.
Mainwaring, Scott. (1999). Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: The case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
39.
Mainwaring, Scott, & Scully, Timothy. (Eds.). (1995). Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
Mainwaring, Scott, & Shugart, Matthew. (1997). Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Marimán, José. (1993). Movimiento Mapuche: Transición Democrática en Chile (1989-1993): ¿Nuevo Ciclo Reivindicativo Mapuche? [Mapuche movement: Democratic transition in Chile (1989-1993): New Mapuche claim cycle?] Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
42.
Meléndez Guerrero, Carlos. (2003). Ultimo Mapa Político: Análisis de los Resultados de Las Elecciones Regionales de Noviembre del 2002 [Latest political map: Analysis of the results of the regional elections of November 2002]. Lima, Peru: IEP.
43.
Mozaffar, Shaheen, Scarritt, James R., & Galaich, Glen. (2003). Electoral institutions, ethno-political cleavages and party systems in Africa’s emerging democracies. American Political Science Review, 97(3), 379-390.
44.
Ordeshook, Peter C., & Shvetsova, Olga. (1994). Ethnic heterogeneity, district magnitude, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 100-123.
45.
Pallares, Amalia. (2002). From peasant struggles to Indian resistance. The Ecuadorian Andes in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
46.
Psacharopoulos, George, & Patrinos, Harry Anthony. (1994). Indigenous people and poverty in Latin America: An empirical analysis. Washington, DC: World Bank.
47.
Roberts, Kenneth M. (1998). Deepening democracy? The modern left and social movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48.
Roberts, Kenneth M. (2001, September). Political cleavages, party-society linkages, and the transformation of political representation in Latin America. Paper presented at the international meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Washington, DC.
49.
Roberts, Kenneth M. (2002a). Party-society linkages and democratic representation in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 27(53), 9-34.
50.
Roberts, Kenneth M. (2002b). Social inequalities without class cleavages in Latin America’s neoliberal era. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(4), 3-33.
51.
Roberts, Kenneth M., & Wibbels, Erik. (1999). Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America: A test of economic, institutional, and structural explanations. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 575-590.
52.
Rosenblum, Marc R., & Huelshoff, Michael. (2004). Not whether but when: Institutions, structure, and political parties. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Orleans.
53.
Ruiz, H., Margarito, & Burguete Cal y Mayor, Aracely. (2001). Indigenous peoples without political parties: The dilemmas of indigenous representation in Latin America. In Kathrin Wessendorf (Ed.), Challenging politics: Indigenous peoples’ experiences with political parties and elections (pp. 20-63). Copenhagen, Denmark: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.
54.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
55.
Secretaría Nacional de Participación Popular. (1997). Indígenas en el poder local [Indians in local power]. La Paz, Bolivia: Ministerio de Desarrollo Humano.
56.
Secretaría Técnica del Frente Social. (2001). Sistema Integrado de Indicadores Sociales del Ecuador (SIISE) [CD-ROM]. Quito, Ecuador: SIISE.
57.
Snyder, Richard. (2001). Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 93-110.
58.
Stavenhagen, Rodolfo. (1992). Challenging the nation-state in Latin America.Journal of International Affairs, 34(2), 421-440.
59.
Taagepera, Rein, & Shugart, Matthew Soberg. (1989). Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
60.
Tanaka, Martin. (1998). Los espejismos de la democracia: El colapso del sistema de partidos en el Perú, 1980-1995. Lima, Peru: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
61.
Ticona Alejo, Esteban, Rojas, Gonzalo, & Albó, Xavier. (1995). Votos y Wiphalas: Campesinos y Pueblos Originarios en Democracia [Votes and Wiphalas: Peasants and original peoples in democracy]. La Paz, Bolivia: CIPCA.
62.
Tuesta Soldevilla, Fernando. (2001). Perú Político en Cifras: 1821-2001 [Political Peru in figures: 1821-2001]. Lima, Peru: Fundación Friedrich Ebert.
63.
Van Cott, Donna Lee. (2000). Party system development and indigenous populations in Latin America: The Bolivian case. Party Politics, 6(2), 155-174.
64.
Van Cott, Donna Lee. (2003). From exclusion to inclusion: Bolivia’s 2002 elections. Journal of Latin American Studies, 35(4), 751-776.
65.
Van Cott, Donna Lee. (2005). From movements to parties in Latin America: The evolution of ethnic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
66.
Yashar, Deborah J. (1998). Contesting citizenship: Indigenous movements and democracy in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 31(1), 23-42.
