Using insights from social choice theory, particularly Black's concept of single-peaked preferences and Downs's median-voter model, the authors previously investigated the theoretical impact of the alternative vote system (AV) on the success of moderate parties in an ethnically bipolar society. Focusing on the simplest case, that with one moderate and one extremist ethnic party associated with each of the two ethnic groups, they found that for AV to necessarily yield outcomes that favor moderate parties there must be majority support for moderation and voter preferences that are single peaked with respect to the ethnic-conflict-defined dimension. Here, the authors test these assumptions with data from the 1999 and 2001 elections in Fiji, an ethnically bipolar society. They show that Fiji's objective of ameliorating ethnic divisions by the adoption of AV was not successful. In elections in 1999 and 2001, moderate parties would have fared better under a proportional representation system.
Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social choice and individual values (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley. (Original work published 1951)
2.
Axelrod, R. M. (1970). Conflict of interest: A theory of divergent goals with applications to politics. Chicago: Markham.
3.
Black, D. (1958). The theory of committees and elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Bowler, S., & Grofman, B. (2000). Introduction:STV as an embedded system. In S. Bowler & B. Grofman (Eds.), Elections in Australia, Ireland and Malta under the single transferable vote: Reflections on an embedded system (pp. 1-14). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5.
Court of Appeal. (2001). Chaudhry v. Qarase, President & Attorney General, Civil Action No 282 of 2001, Misc. 1/2001.
6.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
Dummett, M. (1997). Principles of electoral reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Fiji Elections Office. (1999). Elections ‘99: Results by the count. Available from http://www.elections.gov.fj/results1999/by_the_count.html
9.
Fiji Elections Office. (2001a). General elections 2001: Party preference lists. Available from http://www.elections.gov.fj/parties/preferences/start.html
10.
Fiji Elections Office. (2001b). General elections 2001: Results by the count. Available from http://www.elections.gov.fj/results2001/constituencies/start.html
11.
Firth, S. (1989). The contemporary history of Fiji. Journal of Pacific History, 24(2), 242-246.
12.
Fraenkel, J. (2000a).The clash of dynasties and the rise of demagogues;Fiji's Tauri Vakaukauwaof May 2000. Journal of Pacific History, 35(3), 295-308.
13.
Fraenkel, J. (2000b). The triumph of the non-idealist intellectuals? An investigation of Fiji's 1999 election results. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 46(1), 86-109.
14.
Fraenkel, J. (2001). The alternative vote system in Fiji: Electoral engineering or ballot-rigging?Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 39(2), 1-31.
15.
Fraenkel, J. (2005). Redistricting via coups and constitutions: The construction of ethnicallymixed constituencies in Fiji 1970-2001. Journal of Pacific Studies, 28(1), 23-55.
16.
Fraenkel, J., & Grofman, B. (2004). A neo-Downsian model of the alternative vote as a mechanism for mitigating ethnic conflict in plural societies. Public Choice, 121, 487-506.
17.
Grofman, B., & Feld, S. L. (2004). If you like the alternative vote (a.k.a. the instant runoff), then you ought to know about the Coombs rule. Electoral Studies, 23, 641-659.
18.
Head, M. (2001). A victory for democracy? An alternative assessment of Republic of Fiji V Prasad. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 2(2), 535-549.
19.
Horowitz, D. L. (1989). Incentives and behaviour in the ethnic politics of Sri Lanka and Malaysia. Third World Quarterly, 11(4), 18-35.
20.
Horowitz, D. L. (1991a). A democratic South Africa? Constitutional engineering in a divided society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Horowitz, D. L. (1991b). Making moderation pay: The comparative politics of ethnic conflict management. In J. Montville (Ed.), Conflict and peacemaking in multiethnic societies (pp. 451-475). New York: Lexington Books.
22.
Horowitz, D. L. (1993). Democracy in divided societies. Journal of Democracy, 4(4), 18-38.
23.
Horowitz, D. L. (1997). Encouraging electoral accommodation in divided societies. In B. V. Lal & P. Larmour (Eds.), Electoral systems in divided societies: The Fiji constitutional review(pp. 21-37). Canberra: Australian National University.
24.
Horowitz, D. L. (2000a). Constitutional design: An oxymoron? In I. Shapiro & S. Macedo (Eds.), Designing democratic institutions, Nomos XLII (pp. 253-284). New York: New York University Press.
25.
Horowitz, D. L. (2000b, December). Some realism about peacemaking. Paper delivered at the conference“Facing Ethnic Conflicts,”Center for Development Research, Bonn,Germany.
26.
Horowitz, D. (2002). Constitutional design: Proposals versus process. In A. Reynolds (Ed.), The architecture of democracy: Constitutionaldesign, conflict management, and democracy (pp. 15-36). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
Horowitz, D. L. (2004). The alternative vote and interethnic moderation: A reply to Fraenkel and Grofman. Public Choice, 121, 507-516.
28.
Howard, M. (1991). Fiji: Race andpolitics in an island state. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
29.
International Crisis Group. (1998). Changing the logic of bosnian politics (ICG Rep. No. 32). Retrieved from http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?l=1&id=1242&sr=2
30.
International Crisis Group. (1999). Breaking the mould: Electoral reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina (ICG Balkans Rep. No. 56). Retrieved from http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?l=1&id=1242&sr=2
31.
Lal, B. V. (1988). Power and prejudice: The making of the Fiji vrisis. Wellington: New Zealand Institute of International Affairs.
32.
Lal, B. V. (1998). Another way: The politics of constitutional reform in post-coup Fiji, Canberra, Australia: NCDS, Asia-Pacific Press.
33.
Lal, B. V. (1999). A time to change? The Fiji general elections of 1999. In B. V. Lal (Ed.), Fiji before the storm: Elections and the politics of development (pp. 21-47). Canberra: Asia-Pacific Press, Australian National University.
34.
Lijphart, A. (1991a). The alternative vote: A realistic alternative for South Africa?Politkon, 18(2), 91-101.
35.
Lijphart, A. (1991b). Constitutional choices for new democracies. Journal of Democracy, 2(1), 72-84.
36.
Lijphart, A. (1991c). The power sharing approach. In J. Montville (Ed.), Conflict and peacemaking in multiethnic societies (pp. 491-509). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
37.
Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945-1990. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
Lijphart, A. (1997). Disproportionality under alternative voting: The crucial—and puzzling— case of the Australian senate elections, 1919-1946. Acta Politica, 32(1), 9-24.
39.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
Narsey, W. (2002, February 15). Passing the buck. Fiji Times,p.7-7.
41.
Norton, R. (2000). Reconciling ethnicity and nation: Contending discourses in Fiji's constitutional reform. The Contemporary Pacific, 12(1), 83-122.
42.
Reeves, P., Vakatora, T. R., & Lal, B. V. (1996). The Fiji Islands: Towards a united future (Rep. of the Fiji Constitutional Review Commission, Parliament of Fiji, Parliamentary Paper No. 34). Suva, Fiji: Government Printer.
43.
Reilly, B. (1997a). Constitutional engineering and the alternative vote in Fiji: An assessment. In B. V. Lal & P. Larmour (Eds.), Electoral systems in divided societies. The Fiji Constitutional Review (pp. 73-95). Canberra: Australian National University.
44.
Reilly, B. (1997b).Preferential voting and political engineering:A comparative study. Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 35(1), 1-19.
45.
Reilly, B. (2001). Democracy in divided societies: Electoral engineering for conflict management. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Reilly, B., & Reynolds, A. (1999). Electoral systems and conflict in divided societies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47.
Reynolds, A. (Ed.). (2002). The architecture of democracy: Constitutional design, conflict management, and democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
Robertson, R., & Tamanisau, A. (1988). Fiji: Shattered coups. Sydney, Australia: Pluto Press.
49.
Scarr, D. (1988). Fiji: The politics of illusion. Sydney, Australia: New South Wales University Press.
50.
Scarr, D. (1997). Constitutional change in Fiji, 1997. Journal of Pacific History, 32(3), 44-52.
51.
Sisk, T. (1996). Power sharing and international mediation in ethnic conflict. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.
