In both Finland and Ireland, democracy was the product of long-term processes of development, and the question is why the presence of democratic norms and institutions did not prevent their civil wars. Arguably both systems were destabilized by the delay between the first democratic elections and the achievement of legislative independence, when crises over who should inherit the empires’ legislative power became interlinked with the absence of coercive institutions.
Alapuro, R. (1985). Interstate relations and political mobilisation in the Nordic countries: A perspective. In R. Alapuro, M. Alestalo, E. Haavio-Mannila, & R. Väyrynen (Eds.), Small states in comparative perspective: Essays for Erik Allardt (pp. 93-107). Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
2.
Alapuro, R. (1988). State and revolution in Finland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Alapuro, R. (1992). Peasants in the consolidation of the Finnish state: The rise of a non-dominant ethnic group. In D. Howell (Ed.), Roots of rural ethnic mobilisation (Vol. 4, pp. 145-168). New York: European Science Foundation, New York University Press.
4.
Axelrod, R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80, 1095-1111.
5.
Buckland, P. (1973). Irish unionism 1885-1922. London: Historical Association.
6.
Coakley, J. (1987). Political succession and regime change in new states in interwar Europe: Ireland, Finland, Czechoslovakia, and the Baltic Republics. European Journal of Political Research, 14, 187-207.
7.
Coakley, J. (1994). The election that made the First Dail. In B. Farrell (Ed.), The creation of the Dail: A volume of essays from the Thomas Davis lectures (pp. 31-37). Dublin, Ireland: Blackwater.
8.
Cohen, J., Brown, B. R., & Organski, A.F.K. (1981). The paradoxicalnature of state making: The violent creation of order. American Political Science Review, 75, 901-911.
9.
Coogan, T. P. (1993). De Valera: Long fellow, long shadow. London: Hutchinson.
10.
Coogan, T. P., & Morrison, G. (1998). The Irish civil war. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
11.
Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
de Valera, E. (1936). Civil war 1922-24: Historical summary (D/T S 9282). Dublin, Ireland: National Archives.
14.
Farrell, B. (1973). The paradox of Irish politics. In B. Farrell (Ed.), The Irish parliamentary tradition (pp. 13-26). Dublin, Ireland: Gill and MacMillan.
15.
Hegre, H., Ellengsen, T., Gates, S., & Gladitsch, N. P. (2001). Towards a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816-1992. American Political Science Review, 95, 16-33.
16.
Jussila, S., Hentila, S., & Nevakivi, J. (1999). From grand duchy to modern state: A political history of Finland since 1809. London: Hurst.
17.
Karvonen, L. (2000). Finland: From conflict to compromise. In D. Berg Schlosser & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Conditions of democracy in Europe, 1919-39 (pp. 129-157). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
18.
Kirby, D. (Ed.). (1975). Finland and Russia 1808-1920: From autonomy to independence—A selection of documents. London: Macmillan.
19.
Kirby, D. (1976). The Finnish Social Democratic Party and the Bolsheviks. Journal of Contemporary History, 11, 99-113.
20.
Kissane, B. (2002). Explaining Irish democracy. Dublin, Ireland: University College of Dublin Press.
21.
Krain, M., & Myers, M. E. (1997). Democracy and civil war: A note on the democratic peace proposition. International Interactions, 23, 109-118.
22.
Layne, C. (1994). Kant or cant: The myth of the democratic peace. International Security, 19(2), 5-45.
23.
Mansfield, E. D., & Snyder, J. (1995). Democratization and the danger of war. International Security, 20, 5-39.
24.
Morgan, T. C., & Cambell, S. H. (1991). Domestic structure, decisional constraints, and war: So why Kant democracies fight?Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 187-211.
25.
Peltonen, M. (1995). From peasant holdings to family farms. In L. Graberg & J. Nikula (Eds.), The peasant state: The state and rural questions in twentieth century Finland (pp. 23-42). Rovaniemi, Finland: University of Lapland.
26.
Regan, J. (1999). The Irish counter-revolution 1921-1936. Dublin, Ireland: Gill and MacMillan.
27.
Renvall, P. (1957a). Development of parliamentary institutions in Finland. In E. Makinen (Ed.), The Finnish Parliament (pp. 9-14). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Parliament.
28.
Renvall, P. (1957b). Finland’s single-chamber Parliament—Fifty years of activity. In E. Makinen (Ed.), The Finnish Parliament (pp. 15-34). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Parliament.
29.
Rintala, M. (1962). Three generations: The extreme right wing in Finnish politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
30.
Russett, B. (1993). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-Cold War world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Snyder, J. (2000). From voting to violence: Democratization and nationalist conflict. New York: Norton.
32.
Upton, A. (1980). The Finnish revolution 1917-1918. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
Wuorinen, J. (1965). A history of Finland. New York: Columbia University Press.
