This study examines how different party systems in Latin America affect the capability of opposition parties to use public concerns about political corruption for electoral mobilization. Opposition partisanship is more strongly linked to perceptions of corruption in the ideologically polarized party system of Chile than in the hegemonic party system then in decline in Mexico or in the centrist two-party system of Costa Rica. However, the capability of opposition parties in all three party systems to mobilize electoral support among voters dissatisfied with corruption is weakened by the tendency of these politically alienated citizens to withdrawfrom all types of political involvement. Implications of the findings for redressing problems of political corruption through the electoral process and for a deepening of democracy in Latin America are discussed.
Bailey, John. (1994). The 1994 Mexican presidential election. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
2.
Banfield, Edward. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. Chicago: Free Press.
3.
Booth, John A. (1998). Costa Rica: Quest for democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
4.
Bruhn, Kathleen. (1997). Taking on Goliath: The emergence of a new left party and the struggle for democracy in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
5.
Camp, Roderic Ai. (Ed.). (2001). Citizen views of democracy in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
6.
Camp, Roderic Ai. (2003). Mexican politics: The democratic transformation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
Chile: 1997 Chamber of Senators elections. (2001). Retrieved from http://www.georgetown.edu/pdba/Elecdata/Chile/sen1997.html
8.
Davis, Charles L., & Coleman, Kenneth M. (1983). Who abstains? The situational meaning of non-voting. Social Science Quarterly, 64(3), 764-776.
9.
Dresser, Denise. (1998). Post-NAFTA politics in Mexico. In Carol Wise (Ed.), The post-NAFTA political economy: Mexico and the Western Hemisphere(pp. 221-258). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
10.
Elections in Chile. (2003). Retrieved from http://www.electionworld.org/election/chile.htm
11.
The free market still scores highly among Latin Americans. (1999, n.d.). Mirror on the Americas [Special section]. Wall Street Journal Americas, p 1-1.
12.
Geddes, Barbara, & Ribeiro Neto, Artur. (1992). Institutional sources of corruption in Brazil. Third World Quarterly, 13(4), 641-660.
13.
Goodman, Louis W. (2001). Chilean citizens and Chilean democracy: The management of fear, division, and alienation. In Roderic Ai Camp (Ed.), Citizen views of democracy in Latin America(pp. 206-222). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
14.
Halpern, Pablo,& Bousquet, Edgardo. (1992). Percepciones de la opinión publica acerca del rol economico y social del estado. Estudios Cieplan, 36, 99-130.
15.
Klesner, Joseph. (2000). The 2000 Mexican presidential and congressional elections: Preelection report. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies.
McCann, James A., & Domínguez, Jorge I. (1998). Mexicans react to political corruption and electoral fraud: An assessment of public opinion and voting behavior. Electoral Studies, 17(4), 483-504.
18.
Morris, Stephen D. (1991). Corruption and politics in contemporary Mexico. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
19.
Paige, Jeffery. (1997). Coffee and power: Revolution and the rise of democracy in Central America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Przeworski, Adam. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Romero, Aníbal. (1997). Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic: The agony of democracy in Venezuela. Latin American Research Review, 32(1), 7-36.
22.
Rottinghaus, Brandon,& Alberro, Irina. (2002, April). Public opinion polling in the 2000 Mexican election: Did Vicente Fox lead, follow, or create public opinion and why does it matter?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
23.
Salazar C., Luis (Ed.). (2001). México 2000: Alternancia y transición a la democracia. Mexico City, Mexico: Ediciones Cal y Arena.
24.
Scully, Timothy R. (1995). Reconstituting party politics in Chile. In Scott Mainwaring& Timothy R. Scully (Eds.), Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America(pp. 100-137). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
Seligson, Mitchell. (2003). Corruption and democratization. Unpublished manuscript.
26.
Seligson, Mitchell A. (2002a). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408-433.
27.
Seligson, Mitchell A. (2002b). Trouble in paradise? The erosion of system support, 1978-1999. Latin American Research Review, 37(1), 160-185.
28.
Valenzuela, Arturo. (1999). Chile: Origins and consolidation of a Latin American democracy. In Larry Diamond, Jonathan Hartlyn, Juan J. Linz, & Seymour Martin Lipset (Eds.), Democracy in developing countries: Latin America(pp. 191-248). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
29.
Weyland, Kurt. (1998). The politics of corruption in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 9(2), 108-121.
30.
Wilson, Bruce. (1998). Costa Rica: Politics, economics and democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
