Changing Partners: The Dance of Infant Formula Changes

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to establish the frequency of, reasons for, and outcome of formula changes in infants. In this survey, we interviewed a convenience sample of 100 parents in our pediatric outpatient clinic and 75 parents in private pediatric office practices regarding their baby's initial formula, changes in formula, age at change, reason for change, initiator of the change, and outcome. The infants were 30-210 days old. Sixteen of the 175 infants (9%) were started on nonstandard formulas at birth. Fifty-eight of the remaining 159 infants (36%) were changed from regular to nonstandard formulas. After using nonstandard formulas, only seven infants (4%) were ever challenged subsequently with regular formula and all did well. Colic and regurgitation were the main reasons for switching formulas. In 47% the decision to change the formula was made by the mother and in 44% by the pediatrician. Following the formula change, mothers reported improvement or complete resolution of symptoms in 80% of infants. Although published estimates of formula intolerance range from 2% to 7.5%, one in three infants experiences a formula change, suggesting that nonstandard formulas are used excessively by both mothers and physicians. Nevertheless, in the vast majority of cases, parents report that the changes result in improvement or resolution of symptoms. Thus, while this practice appears to be a simple and effective intervention, it produces a significant population of soy and other nonstandard formula-fed babies who should be drinking regular formulas. Such changes encourage a belief by parents that their infants are allergic or otherwise abnormal and could have a negative impact on subsequent child development.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Bock SA . Prospective appraisal of complaints of adverse reactions in children during the first 3 years of life. Pediatrics. 1987;79:683-688.

2. Jakobsson I , Lindeberg TA . A prospective study of cow's milk protein intolerance in Swedish infants. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1979;68:853-859.

3. Gerrard JW , MacKenzie JWA , Goluboff N , et al. Cow's milk allergy: prevalence and manifestations in an unselected series of newborns. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1973;234 (suppl):3-21.

4. Stintzing G , Zetterstrom R . Cow's milk allergy, incidence and role of early exposure to cow's milk formula. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1979;68:383-387.

5. Forsyth BWC , McCarthy PL , Leventhal JM . Problems of early infancy, formula changes, and mothers' beliefs about their infants. J Pediatr. 1985; 106:1012-1017.

6. Dodgej A . Functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Gracey M , Burke V , eds. Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 3rd ed. Boston: Blackwell; 1993:880-881.

7. Hide DW , Guyer BM . Prevalence of infant colic. Arch Dis Child. 1982;57:559-560.

8. Sampson HA . Infantile colic and food allergy: fact or fiction? J Pediatr. 1989; 115:583-584.

9. Lothe L , Lindberg T . Cow's milk whey protein elicits symptoms of infantile colic in colicky formula-fed infants: a double-blind crossover study. Pediatrics. 1989;83:262-266.

10.

10. Lothe L , Lindberg T , Jakobsson I . Cow's milk formula as a cause of infantile colic: a double-blind study. Pediatrics. 1982;70:7-10.

11.

11. Thomas DW , McGilligan K , Eisenberg LD , et al. Infantile colic and type of milk feeding. AmJDis Child. 1987; 141:451-453.

12.

12. Taubman B . Parental counseling compared with elimination of cow's milk or soy milk protein for the treatment of infant colic syndrome: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 1988;81:756-761.

13.

13. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition . Soy proteinbased formulas: recommendations for use in infant feeding. Pediatrics. 1998;101:148-153.

14.

14. Barness LA , Curran JS . First-year feeding problems. In: Behrman RE , Kliegman RM , Arvin AM , eds. Nelson's Textbook of Pediatrics. 15th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1996:164-165.

15.

15. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Nutrition . Practical significance of lactose intolerance in children: supplement. Pediatrics. 1990; 86:643-644.

16.

16. Suarez FL , Savaiano DA , Levitt MD . A comparison of symptoms after consumption of milk or lactose-hydrolyzed milk by people with self-reported severe lactose intolerance. NEnglJMed. 1995;333:1-4.

17.

17. Chandra RK , Hamed A . Cumulative incidence of atopic disorders in high risk infants fed whey hydrolysate, soy, and conventional cow's milk formula. Ann Allergy. 1991;67:129-132.

18.

18. Kjellman NIM , Johansson SGO . Soy versus cow's milk in infants with biparental history of atopic disease and immunoglobulins from birth to 4 years of age. Clin Allergy. 1979;9:347-358.

19.

19. Miskelly FG , Burr ML , Vaughanwilliam E , et al. Infant feeding and allergy. Arch Dis Child. 1988;63:388-393.

20.

20. Taitz LS . Soy feeding in infancy. Arch Dis Child. 1982;57:814-815.

21.

21. Taylor E . Diet and behavior. Arch Dis Child. 1984;59:97-98.

22.

22. Levy JC . Vulnerable children: parents' perspectives and the use of medical care. Pediatrics. 1980;65:956-963.

23.

23. Kemper K , Forsyth B , McCarthy P . Jaundice, terminating breast-feeding, and the vulnerable child. Pediatrics. 1989;84:773-778.

24.

24. Chorazy PA , Himelhoch S , Hopwood NJ , et al. Persistent hypothyroidism in an infant receiving a soy formula: case report and review of the literature. Pediatrics. 1995;96:148-150.

25.

25. Sinatra FR , Merritt RJ . latrogenic kwashiorkor in infants. AmJDis Child. 1981;135:21-23.