Symptomatic Blunt Head Injury in Children—A Prospective,Single-Investigator Study

Abstract

The goal of this study was to describe a single emergency physician's experience with symptomatic blunt head injury in children and prospectively assess the sensitivity and predictive value of the neurologic examination. The author utilized a prospective patient series comparing neurologic examination with computed tomography (CT) of the head. Nine of 42 patients had intracranial injury for a prevalence of 21%; two patients (5%) had intracranial injury with only subtle neurologic examination findings. Twenty-six patients had a negative neurologic examination, and all had normal-appearing CT scans. Sixteen patients had a positive neurologic examination, of whom nine had a positive CT scan. The properties of the neurologic examination as a diagnostic test, with CT as the gold standard, were as follows: sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 78%, positive predictive value = 56%, negative predictive value = 100%. Normal findings from neurologic examination can be used in some children with symptomatic blunt head injury to delay or eliminate the need for CT of the head.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Lescohier I , DiScala C . Blunt trauma in children: causes and outcomes of head versus extracranial injury. Pediatrics. 1993;91:721-725.

2. Rivara F , Tanaguchi D , Parish RA , et al. Poor prediction of positive computed tomographic scans by clinical criteria in symptomatic pediatric head trauma. Pediatrics. 1987;80:579-584.

3. Rosenthal BW , Bergman I . Intracranial injury after moderate head trauma in children. J Pediatr. 1989;115:346-350.

4. Dietrich AM , Bowman MJ , Ginn-Pease ME , et al. Pediatric head injuries: can clinical factors reliably predict an abnormality on computed tomography? Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:1535-1540.

5. Davis RL , Mullen N , Makela M , et al. Cranial computed tomography scans in children after minimal head injury with loss of consciousness. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24:640-645.

6. Ramundo ML , McKnight T , KempfJ , Satkowiac L . Clinical predictors of computed tomographic abnormalities following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1995;11:1-4.

7. Dacey RG , Alves WM , Rimel RW , et al. Neurosurgical complications after apparently minor head injury. Assessment of risk in a series of 610 patients. JNeurosurg. 1986;65:203-210.

8. Hoffman JR . CT for head trauma in children. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24:713-715.

9. Ros SP , Ros MA . Should patients with normal cranial CT scans following minor head injury be hospitalized for observation? Pediatr Emerg Care. 1989:5:216-218.

10.

10. Davis RL , Hughes M , Gubler KD , et al. The use of cranial CT scans in the triage of pediatric patients with mild head injury. Pediatrics. 1995;95:345-349.

11.

11. Dahl-Grove DL , Chande VT , Barnoski A . Closed head injuries in children: is hospital admission always necessary? PediatrEmergCare. 1995;11:86-88.

12.

12. Mitchell KA , Fallat ME , Raque GH , et al. Evaluation of minor head injury in children.JPediatrSurg. 1994;29:851-854.

13.

13. Snoek JW , Minderhood JM , Wilmirk JT . Delayed deterioration following minor head injury in children. Brain. 1984;107:15-36.

14.

14. Humphreys RP , Hendrick EB , Hoffman HJ . The head-injured child who “talks and dies.” A report of 4 cases. Child Nerv System. 1990;6:139-142.

15.

15. Nee PA , Phillips BM , Bannister CM . Extradural hematoma in a child after an apparently mild head injury. Br Medj 1993;306:1665-1666.

16.

16. Yager JY , Johnston B , Sahashi SS . Coma scales in pediatric practice. Am JDis Child. 1990;144:1088-1091.

17.

17. Teasdale G , Jennet B . Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81-84.

18.

18. James H . Neurologic evaluation and support in the child with an acute brain insult. PediatrAnn. 1986;15:16-22.