McClennan BL , Stolberg HOIntravascular contrast media. Ionic versus nonionic: current status. Radiol Clin North Am. 1991;29:437-454.
2.
McClennan BLIonic and nonionic iodinated contrast media: evolution and strategies for use. AJR. 1990 ;155:225-233.
3.
Hirshfeld JW Jr. Cardiovascular effects of iodinated contrast agents. Am J Cardiol.1990;66:9F-17F.
4.
BrinkerJASelection of a contrast agent in the cardiac catheterization laboratory . Am J Cardiol.1990;66:26F-33F.
5.
Cohen MD, Weber TR, Grosfeld JLBowel perforation in the newborn: diagnosis with metrizamide. Radiology. 1984;150:65-69.
6.
Keller MS, Chawla HSNeonatal metrizamide gastrointestinal series in suspected necrotizing enterocolitis . Am J Dis Child.1985;139:713-716.
7.
Dutton RV, Singleton EBUse of low osmolar contrast for gastrointestinal studies in low-birth-weight infants. Am J Dis Child.1987;141:635-638.
8.
Benamor M., Aten EM, McElvany KD, et al. Ioversol clinical safety summary. Invest Radiol.1989;24 (Suppl 1):S67-S72.
9.
Spataro RF, Katzberg RW, Fischer HW, et al. High-dose clinical urography with the low-osmolality contrast agent Hexabrix: comparison with a conventional contrast agent. Radiology. 1987;162:9-14.
10.
Palmer FJThe RACR survey of intravenous contrast media reactions final report . Australas Radiol.1988;32:426-428.
11.
King BF, Hartman GW, Williamson B., et al. Low-osmolality contrast media: a current perspective. Mayo Clin Proc.1989;64:976-985.
12.
Mishkin MMContrast media safety: What do we know and how do we know it? Am J Cardiol.1990;66:34F-36F.
13.
Elam EA, Dorr RT, Lagel KE, et al. Cutaneous ulceration due to contrast extravasation: experimental assessment of injury and potential antidotes. Invest Radiol.1991;26:13-16.
14.
Cohan RH, Dunnick NR, Leder RA, et al. Extravasation of nonionic radiologic contrast media: efficacy of conservative treatment. Radiology. 1990 ;176:65-67.
15.
Katayama H. , Yamaguchi K., Kozuka T., et al. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media: a report from the Japanese committee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology. 1990;175:621-628.
16.
Bettmann MAGuidelines for use of low-osmolality contrast agents. Radiology. 1989;172:901-903.
17.
Kinnison ML , Powe NR, Steinbert EPResults of randomized controlled trials of low- versus high-osmolality contrast media. Radiology . 1989;170:381-389.
18.
Lautin EM, Freeman JN, Schoenfeld AJ, et al. Radiocontrast-associated renal dysfunction: a comparison of lower-osmolality and conventional high-osmolality contrast media. AJR. 1990;157:59-65.
Bosio M., Bissoli F., Vignati G., et al. Intravenous urography with iopamidol in children with reflux and obstructive nephropathy: effects on glomerular and tubular functions and the reninangiotensin-aldosterone system. Pediatr Nephrol.1990;4:240-244.
21.
Cohen MDChoosing contrast media for the evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract of neonates and infants. Radiology. 1987;162:447-456.
22.
Ginai AZExperimental evaluation of various available contrast agents for use in the gastrointestinal tract in case of suspected leakage: effects on peritoneum . Br J Radiol.1985;58:969-978.
23.
Ginai AZ, ten Kate Fjw, ten Berg Rgm, et al. Experimental evaluation of various available contrast agents for use in the upper gastrointestinal tract in case of suspected leakage: effects on lungs. Br J Radiol.1984;57:895-901.
24.
Ginai AZ, ten Kate Fjw, ten Berg Rgm, et al. Experimental evaluation of various available contrast agents for use in the upper gastrointestinal tract in case of suspected leakage: effects on mediastinum. Br J Radiol.1985:58:585-592.
25.
McAlister WH , Siegel MJFatal aspirations in infancy during gastrointestinal series. Pediatr Radiol.1984;14:81-83.
26.
McAlister WH , Askin FBThe effect of some contrast agents in the lung: an experimental study in the rat and dog. AJR.1990;140:245-251.
27.
Ratcliffe JFThe use of low osmolality water soluble (LOWS) contrast media in the pediatric gastrointestinal tract. A report of 115 examinations . Pediatr Radiol.1986;16:47-52.
28.
Ratcliffe JFThe use of ioxaglate in the paediatric gastro-intestinal tract: a report of 25 cases. Clin Radiol.1983;34:579-583.
29.
Schwartzentruber DJ, Billmire DF, Cohen M., et al. Use of iohexol in the radiographic diagnosis of ischemic bowel. J Pediatr Surg.1986;21:525-529.
30.
Cohen MD, Towbin R., Baker S., et al. Comparison of iohexol with barium in gastrointestinal studies of infants and children. AJR. 1991;156:345-350.
31.
Latchaw REThe cost of low-osmolality contrast media: Can we minimize the economic impact ? AJNR.1990;11:850-851.
32.
Fischer HWCost vs safety: the use of low-osmolar contrast media. JAMA.1988;260.
33.
Debatin JF, Cohan RH, Leder RA, et al. Selective use of low-osmolar contrast media. Invest Radiol.1991;26:17-21.
34.
Jacobson PD , Rosenquist J.The introduction of low-osmolar contrast agents in radiology: medical, economic, legal, and public policy issues. JAMA.1988;260:1586-1592.
35.
Wolfe GLSafer, more expensive iodinated contrast agents: How do we decide ? Radiology.1986;159:557-558.
