Despite much progress in the diagnosis and management of children with attentional problems, hyperactivity, and learning difficulties, current diagnostic techniques remain inadequate to readily distinguish a primary attentional disorder from a more complex secondary problem. Developmental and behavioral questionnaires to supplement office evaluation of hyperactivity, neuromaturation, and selected cognitive processes continue to be improved. These measures suffer from different biases, focus on different childhood characteristics and associated problems, and approach childhood interaction with the environment differently. Several are psychometrically more sound, and several provide the physician with developmental and social information that may help improve the habilitative prescription.
The general pediatrician can use these questionnaires to complement his or her evaluation and follow-up of children who present with learning and behavioral problems. Prior to choosing an instrument, the clinician should review the advantages of each and choose the one most suited to his or her practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Lambert NM, Sandoval J.The prevalence of learning disabilities in a sample of children considered hyperactive. J Abn Child Psychol1980;8:33-50.
2.
Sleator EK, Ullmann RKCan the physician diagnose hyperactivity in the office?Pediatrics1981;67:13-17.
3.
American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Ed 3, revised. Washington, D.C., 1987.
4.
Lahey BB, Pelham WE, Schaughensy E., et al. Dimensions and types of attention deficit disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry1988;27:330-5.
Shaywitz SE, Schnell C., Shaywitz BA, et al. Yale Children's Inventory (YCI): an instrument to assess children with attentional deficits and learning disabilities 1. scale development and psychometric properties. J Abn Child Psychol1986;14:347-64.
8.
Conners CK, Barkley RARating scales and checklists for child psychopharmacology. Psychopharmacol Bull1985;21:809-15.
9.
Edelbrock C., Costello AJ, Dulcan MK, et al. Parent-child agreement on child psychiatric symptoms assessed via structured interview. J Child Psychol Psychiatry1986;27:181-90.
10.
Martin RP, Hooper SR, Snow JHBehavior rating scale approaches to personality assessment in children and adolescents. In: Knoff HM, ed. The Psychological Assessment of Child and Adolescent Personality. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1986 , 309-349.
11.
Conners CKA teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children. Am J Psychiatry1969;126:884-8.
12.
Goyette CH, Conners CK, Ulrich RFNormative data on the revised Conners Parent and Teacher Ratings Scales. J Abnorm Child Psychol1978;6:221-36.
13.
Scharar R., Sandberg S., Rutter M.Agreement between teachers' ratings and observations of hyperactivity, inattentiveness, and defiance. J Abnorm Child Psychol1986;14:331-45.
14.
Conners CKIssues in the study of adolescent ADD-H/hyperactivity. Psychopharmacol Bull1985;21:243-50.
15.
McBride MC. An individual double-blind crossover trial for assessing methylphenidate response in children with attention deficit disorder . J Pediatr1988;113:137-45.
16.
Varley C., Trupin E.Double-blind assessment of stimulant medication for attention deficit disorder: a model for clinical application. Am J Orthopsychiatry1983;53:542-7.
17.
Ullmann RK, Sleator EKResponders, Nonresponders, and placebo responders among children with attention deficit disorder. Clin Pediatr1986;25:594-9.
18.
Freeman BJReview of the Child Behavior Checklist. In: Mitchell JV, Jr, ed. The Ninth Mental Measurement Yearbook . Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press, 1985.
19.
Reed ML, Edelbrock C.Reliability and validity of the direct observation form of the Child Behavior Checklist. J Abnorm Child Psychol1983;11:521-30.
20.
Edelbrock C. , Achenbach TMThe teacher version of the Child Behavioral Profile: I, boys aged 6-11. J Consult Clin Psychol1984;52:207-17.
21.
Achenbach TM , Edelbrock CSThe Child Behavioral Profile: II, boys aged 12-16, girls aged 6-11 and 12-16. J Consult Clin Psychol1979;47:223-33.
22.
Shaywitz SE , Shaywitz BA, Schnell C., et al. Concurrent and predictive validity of the Yale children's inventory: an instrument to assess children with attentional deficits and learning disabilities. Pediatrics1988;81:562-71.
23.
Brown LL, Hammill DDThe reliability of four measures of childrens behavior with deviant populations . Behav Dis1981;6:180-2.
24.
Hammill DD, Bartel NRTeaching Students with Learning and Behavioral Problems. Ed 4. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1986, pp 234-6.
25.
Witt JCReview of the behavioral rating profile. In: Mitchell JV, Jr, ed. The Ninth Mental Measurement Yearbook , vol 2. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press, 1985.
26.
Howell KWReview of the aggregate neurobehavioral student health and educational review (ANSER). In: Mitchell, JV Jr, ed. The Ninth Mental Measurement Yearbook, vol 1. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press, 1985.
27.
Ullman RK, Sleator EK, Sprague RLA new rating scale for diagnosis and monitoring of ADD children. Psychopharmacol Bull1984;20:160-4.
28.
Ullman RK, Sleator EK, Sprague RLIntroduction to the use of ACTeRS. Psychopharmacol Bull1985;21:915-20.
29.
Carey WBValidity of parental assessments of development and behavior. Am J Dis Child1982;136:97-9.
30.
Thomas A., Chess S.Temperament and Development. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel Publishers, 1977.
31.
Carey WBMinimal brain dysfunction and hyperkinesis. Am J Dis Child1980;134:926-9.
