Because of the increasing number of reports of sexual abuse of children, pediatricians should become more familiar with the examination of the genitalia of prepubertal children and learn to recognize physical indicators of abuse. Although some physicians may not recognize abnormal findings on examination, in other cases, unusual physical findings may be reported erroneously as possible abuse. The authors report a case of an unusual genital finding in a child which was suspected initially as being caused by sexual abuse but was subsequently determined to be a congenital anomaly. An external examination using a colposcope was useful in delineating the normal appearance of the tissues in question.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Herman-Giddens ME, Frothingham TEPrepubertal female genitalia: Examination for evidence of sexual abuse. Pediatrics1987 ;80:203-8.
2.
Ladson S., Johnson CF, Doty REDo physicians recognize sexual abuse?Am J Dis Child1987;141:411-5.
3.
Hobbs CJ, Wynne JMChild sexual abuse—an increasing rate of diagnosis. Lancet1987;2:837-41.
4.
Emans SJ, Woods ER, Flagg NT, et al. Genital findings in sexually abused, symptomatic and asymptomatic girls. Pediatrics1987;79:778-85.
5.
Adams JA, Ahmad M., Phillips P.Anogenital findings and hymenal diameter in children referred for sexual abuse examination. Adolesc Pediatr Gynecol1988;1:123-7.
6.
McCann J., Voris J., Simon M.Labial adhesions and posterior fourchette injuries in childhood sexual abuse . Am J Dis Child1988;142:659-63.
7.
Kirschner RH , Stein RJThe mistaken diagnosis of child abuse. A form of medical abuse?Am J Dis Child1985;139:873-5.
8.
Shaw A.Are you sure it's child abuse?Contemp Pediatr1986;1:92-100.
9.
Schmitt BD, Gray JD, Britton HLCar seat burns in infants: Avoiding confusion with inflicted bums. Pediatrics1978;62:607-9.
10.
Woodling BA , Heger A.The use of the colposcope in the diagnosis of sexual abuse in the pediatric age group. Child Abuse Negl1986;10:111-4.
