In a comparative study of 113 infants of affluent and well-educated par ents in the same environment, 52 were breast fed and 61 artificially fed. No significant differences could be found between the two groups with respect to a variety of standard clinical measures of health and wellbeing. Where poor hygiene is not a factor, mother's milk per se appears to offer no advantage over present-day artificial infant foods.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Meyer, H.F.: Breast feeding in the United States: report of a 1966 national survey with comparable 1946 and 1956 data. Clin. Pediat.7: 708, 1968.
2.
Salber, E.J. and Feinleib, M.: Breast-feeding in Boston. Pediatrics37: 299, 1966.
3.
Beal, V.A.: Breast- and formula-feeding of infants. J. Amer Diet. Assoc.55: 31, 1969.
4.
Arnhold, R.G. and Callas, E.R.: Composition of a suburban pediatric office practice: an analysis of patient visits during one year. Clin. Pediat. 5: 722, 1966.
5.
Warren, R.J. , Lepow, M.L., Bartsch, G.E. and Robbins, F.C.: The relationship of maternal antibody, breast feeding and age to the susceptibility of newborn infants to infection with attenuated polioviruses. Pediatrics34: 4, 1964.
6.
Kenny, J.F., Boesman, M.I. and Michaels, R.H.: Bacterial and viral coproantibodies in breast-fed infants. Ibid.39: 202, 1967.
7.
Sabin, A.B. and Fieldsteel. A.H. : Antipoliomyelitic activity of human and bovine colostrum and milk. Ibid.29: 105, 1962.
8.
Jelliffe, D.B. : La Leche League as an influence in tropical pediatrics. J. Pediat.69: 161, 1966.
