Different Countries,Different Perspectives: A Comparative Analysis of the South China Sea Disputes Coverage by Malaysian and Chinese Newspapers

Abstract

The South China Sea disputes involve both island and maritime claims among several sovereign states within the region, namely China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Brunei, Vietnam and Taiwan. Framing an analysis of international news and diplomatic relations allows researchers to examine how news organisations provide their audiences with context regarding news stories through content promotion and exclusion. This study examined how the Malaysian and Chinese newspapers reported about the South China Sea disputes and Malaysia–China bilateral relations. The findings indicated that the newspapers reported the topics with different intensity and prominence, while different news sources were employed. It was also found that conflict was a salient frame used by the various newspapers. In addition, this study found that the Malaysian and Chinese newspapers exhibited different valence in reporting the South China Sea disputes. Among the Malaysian newspapers under examination in this study, Sin Chew Daily (a Chinese-language daily) employed the most similar frame to that of the Chinese newspapers, where the coverage was pervasive with supportive valence towards China.

Keywords

South China Sea disputes Malaysia-China relations diplomacy bilateral relations framing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bashir

Fedorova

2015. ‘Framing the Pussy Riot between the USA and Russia’, The Journal of International Communication, Vol. 21, No. 1, 132–52.

Baumgartner

S.E.

Wirth

2012. ‘Affective Priming During the Processing of News Articles’, Media Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1–18.

Bosman

d’Haenens

2008. ‘News Reporting on Pim Fortuyn: Framing in Two Dutch Newspapers’, Media, Culture and Society, Vol. 30, No. 5, 735–48.

Brown

2005. ‘The Rough and Rosy Road: Sites of Contestation in Malaysia’s Shackled Media Industry’, Pacific Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 1, 39–56.

Devadason

2009. ‘Malaysia-China Network Trade: A Note on Product Upgrading’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 39, No. 1, 36–49.

Entman

R.M.

1993. ‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’, Journal of Communication, Vol. 43, No. 4, 51–8.

Entman

R.M.

2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Entman

R.M.

2007. ‘Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power’, Journal of Communication, Vol. 57, No. 1, 163–73.

Entman

R.M.

2010. ‘Media Framing Biases and Political Power: Explaining Slant in News of Campaign 2008’, Journalism, Vol. 11, No. 4, 389–408.

10.

Feeley

T.H.

Frederick

D.V.

III . 2007. ‘How organ donation is represented in newspaper articles in the United States’, Health Communication, Vol. 21, No. 2, 125–31.

11.

Finkbeiner

J.M.

2013. Malaysia’s Great Power Balance and the South China Sea Disputes. United States Army War College Strategy Research Project. Philadelphia: United States Army War College.

12.

Gamson

W.A.

1988. ‘Political Discourse and Collective Action’, International Social Movement Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 219–44.

13.

Gan

Teo

J.L.

Detenber

B.H.

2005. ‘Framing the Battle for the White House: A Comparison of Two National Newspapers’ Coverage of the 2000 United States Presidential Election’, Gazette, Vol. 67, No. 5, 441–67.

14.

George

2005. ‘The Internet’s Political Impact and the Penetration/Participation Paradox in Malaysia and Singapore’. Media, Culture & Society, Vol. 27, No. 6, 903–20.

15.

Global Times . 2013. ‘Chinese Newspaper Global Times Launches U.S. Edition’. February 23, http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/763520.shtml (accessed on 12 March 2017).

16.

Global Times . 2016a. ‘Busting Myths of South China Sea Arbitration’. July 12, http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/993872.shtml (accessed on 12 March 2017).

17.

Global Times . 2016b. ‘Sea Arbitration Real Test for Neighboring States’. July 12, http://www.globaltimes.cn/daily-specials/outh-China-Sea-arbitration-case/index.html (accessed on 12 March 2017).

18.

Global Times . 2016c. ‘Going Back to Negotiations Only Forward Way for South China Sea Disputes’: Zhao Qizheng. July 18, http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/994924.shtml (accessed on 12 March 2017).

19.

Griffin

E.A.

2003. A First Look at Communication Theory. San Francisco, CA: McGraw-Hill.

20.

Huang

Chen

J.P.

2009. ‘Discursive Democratization in Mainland China: A Diachronic Study of the New Year’s Editorials in the People’s Daily’, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, Vol. 19, No. 2, 199–217.

21.

Kenyon

A.T.

2010. ‘Investigating Chilling Effects: News Media and Public Speech in Malaysia, Singapore and Australia’, International Journal of Communication, Vol. 4, No. 1, 440–67.

22.

Kua

K.S.

2010. The Patriot Game: Writings on the Malaysian Wall. Kuala Lumpur: The Oriengroup.

23.

Lee

T.H.

2011. Chinese Schools in Peninsular Malaysia: The Struggle for Survival. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies Publishing.

24.

Lee

Y.F.

2010. ‘Changes in Chinese’s Political Involvement in Malaysia’, Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol. 18, No. 1, 11–21.

25.

Lent

J.A.

1990. ‘The Development of Multicultural Stability in ASEAN: The Role of Mass Media’, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, Vol. 4, No. 1, 45–58.

26.

Lim

B.S.

Hashim

Azirah

Buttny

2014. ‘Accounts of Religio-cultural Identity in Singapore and Malaysia’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, Vol. 229, 9–28.

27.

Lim

K.H.

Har

W.M.

2008. ‘Political volcano’ in 12^th Malaysian General Election: MakkalSakhti (People Power) against communal politics, ‘3Cs’ and marginalisation of Malaysian Indians, Journal or Politics and Law, Vol. 1, No. 3, 84–101.

28.

Lin

M.L.

2010. ‘Circulation of Official Newspaper, People’s Daily, Hits 2.4 Million’. Global Times, February 11.

29.

Malaysiakini . 2016a. ‘What the Decision on South China Sea Means to Malaysia’. June 15, https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/348469 (accessed on 12 March 2017).

30.

Malaysiakini . 2016b. ‘Malaysia Eyes a Tougher Response in South China Sea’. June 15, https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/343686 (accessed on 12 March 2017).

31.

Malaysiakini . 2016c. ‘High Drama Leaves ASEAN a Weakened Bloc’. July 19, https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/350322 (accessed on 12 March 2017).

32.

Manheim

J.B.

1994. Strategic Public Diplomacy and American Foreign Policy: The Evolution of Influence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

33.

Mohd Noor

Mansor

. 2005. ‘Unity the Malaysian Way: Some Empirical Evidences’, in Kabilan

Muhammad Kamarul

Hassan

Zaharah

(eds.), Readings on Ethnicrelations in a Multicultural Society. Kuala Lumpur: COLLA Research Group, 56–77.

34.

McCombs

2005. ‘A Look at Agenda-setting: Past, Present and Future’, Journalism Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4, 543–57.

35.

McDaniel

2002. ‘Southeast Asia’s Electronically Charged Media Revolution’. Nieman Reports, Vol. 56, No. 2, 63–4.

36.

Y.C.

2009. Walking Tall – 80 Years Sin Chew Daily – Journalism on Malaysian Soil. Petaling Jaya: Sin Chew Daily.

37.

People’s Daily . 2016. ‘The Minutes of the Meeting Between Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin and US Media Delegation on the South China Sea Issue’. June 5, http://en.people.cn/review/20160608.html (accessed on 19 March 2017).

38.

Rodan

2005. Transparency and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Asia: Singapore and Malaysia. New York, NY: Routledge.

39.

Scheufele

D.A.

Tewksbury

2007. ‘Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models, Journal of Communication, Vol. 57, No. 1, 9–20.

40.

Schudson

2000. The Sociology of News Production Revisited (Again), in Curran

Gurevitch

(eds.), Mass Media and Society. London: Oxford University Press, 175–200.

41.

Selva

2010. Media Planning Guide Malaysia 2010. Kuala Lumpur: Perception Media SdnBhd.

42.

Shoemaker

P.J.

Reese

S.D.

1996. Mediating the Message: Theories of Influence on Mass Media Content. New York, NY: Longman.

43.

Sin Chew Daily . 2016a. ‘Don’t Turn South China Sea into War Zone’. July 14.

44.

Sin Chew Daily . 2016b. ‘China Criticizes Western Media’. July 16.

45.

Spratt

Bullock

C.F.

Baldasty

2007. ‚News, Race, and the Status Quo: The Case of Emmett Louis Till’, The Haward Journal of Communication, Vol. 18, No. 3, 169–92.

46.

Steele

2009. ‘Professional Online: How Malaysiakini Challenges Authoritarianism’, International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 14, No. 1, 91–111.

47.

Suryadinata

2007. Understanding the Ethnic Chinese in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

48.

Tan

Y.S.

Thock

K.P.

Ngah

Goh

S.K.

2012. Maintenance and Propagation of Chinese Culture in a Malay State: The Roles of the Chinese Associations in Kuala Terengganu, Asian Ethnicity, Vol. 13, No. 4, 441–67.

49.

Tang

H.W.

2009. ‘The Networked Electorate: The Internet and the Quiet Democratic Revolution in Malaysia and Singapore’, Journal of Information, Law & Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 135–51.

50.

Tankard

J.W.

2008. ‘The empirical Approach to the Study of Media Framing’, in Reese

S.D.

Gandy

O.H.

Grant

A.E.

(eds.), Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 95–105.

51.

The Star . 2016a. ‘U.S. Third Fleet Expands East Asia Role as Tensions Rise with China’. June 15, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/world/2016/06/15/special-report-chinas-vast-fleet-is-tipping-the-balance-in-the-pacific (accessed on 20 March 2017).

52.

The Star . 2016b. ‘Cause for Arbitration’. June 22, https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2016/06/22/cause-for-arbitration (accessed on 20 March 2017).

53.

The Star . 2016c. ‘China Brushes Off Doubts Over Support on South China Sea, Says It is Growing’. June 23, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/world/2016/06/23/china-brushes-off-doubts-over-support-on-south-china-sea-says-it-is-growing (accessed on 20 March 2017).

54.

The Star . 2016d. ‘Xi Highlights Beijing’s Stance Ahead of Ruling on Sea Claims’. July 2, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/6/2/malaysia-views-islands-as-provocation (accessed on 20 March 2017).

55.

The Star . 2016e. ‘Ahead of Key Court Ruling, Beijing in Propaganda Overdrive’. July 4, https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2016/07/04/ahead-of-key-court-ruling-beijing-in-propaganda-overdrive (accessed on 20 March 2017).

56.

The Star . 2016f. ‘Beijing in Propaganda Overdrive Ahead of Court Ruling’. July 5, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/regional/2016/07/05/beijing-in-propaganda-overdrive-ahead-of-court-ruling/ (accessed on 20 March 2017).

57.

The Star . 2016g. ‘Manila Willing to Share South China Sea’. July 9, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/regional/2016/07/09/manila-willing-to-share-south-china-sea/ (accessed on 20 March 2017).

58.

The Star . 2016h. ‘How will Verdict on South China Sea Dispute Be Delivered’. July 12, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/07/12/how-will-the-arbitrary-tribunal-on-south-china-sea-dispute-be-delivered (accessed on 20 March 2017).

59.

The Star . 2016i. ‘Factbox – Hague Tribunal Says No Legal Basis for China Claims in South China Sea’. July 12, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/07/12/hague-tribunal-rules-against-china-in-south-china-sea-claim/ (accessed on 20 March 2017).

60.

The Star . 2016k. ‘What is the Nine-dash Line?’ July 13, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/regional/2016/07/13/what-is-the-ninedash-line-and-why-it-has-created-much-tension-in-south-china-sea (accessed on 20 March 2017).

61.

The Star . 2016l. ‘Angry China Warns Against “Cradle of War”’. July 13, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/regional/2016/07/13/angry-china-warns-against-cradle-of-war-in-sea (accessed on 20 March 2017).

62.

The Star . 2016m. ‘Facts on a Decades-long Dispute Over Islands’. July 13, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/regional/2016/07/13/facts-on-a-decadeslong-dispute-over-islands/ (accessed on 20 March 2017).

63.

The Star . 2016n . ‘EU’s Silence on South China Sea Ruling Highlights Inner Discord’. July 14, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/world/2016/07/14/eus-silence-on-south-china-sea-ruling-highlights-inner-discord (accessed on 20 March 2017).

64.

The Star . 2016o. ‘U.S. Launches Quiet Diplomacy to Ease South China Sea Tensions’. July 14, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/world/2016/07/14/us-launches-quiet-diplomacy-to-ease-south-china-sea-tensions (accessed on 20 March 2017).

65.

The Star . 2019. ‘Malaysia-China Trade Hits US$100bil’. July 9, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/07/09/malaysiachina-trade-hits-us100bil (accessed on 24 August 2019).

66.

Tong

Y.S.

2004. ‘Malaysiakini: Threading a tightrope of Political Pressure and Market Factors’, in Gan

Gomez

Johannen

(eds.), Asian Cyberactivism: Freedom of Expression and Media Censorship. Singapore: Friedrich Naumann Foundation, 270–317.

67.

Utusan Malaysia . 2016a. ‘Constrictive Ways to Solve Disputes’. July 14.

68.

Utusan Malaysia . 2016b. ‘Consequences of the PCA’s Decision for South China Sea’. July 18.

69.

Van Gorp

. 2007. ‘The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In’, Journal of Communication, Vol. 57, No. 1, 60–78.

70.

Wang

2007. ‘For the Good of Public Health or for Political Propaganda: People’s Daily’s Coverage of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Epidemic’, China Media Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, 25–34.

71.

Wimmer

R.D.

Dominick

J.R.

2006. Mass Media Research: An Introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

72.

Albert

2014. ‘Media Censorship in China’, Council on Foreign Relations, Vol. 25, 243.

73.

Zhou

2007. ‘The State and Market Dynamism in the Chinese Press: A Comparative Study of Framing the Internet in China in the People’s Daily and Beijing Youth Daily’. Paper presented at 57th Annual Conference of International Communication Association. San Francisco, CA, 1–40.