The Power-mobility Indoor Driving Assessment (PIDA) was developed to determine accurately a client's competency and safety in using a power mobility device. The instrument's content validity was established through a national survey of power mobility experts including consumers and occupational therapists. The final version of the assessment has 30 items. A pilot study of its reliability was conducted at the Sunnybrook Health Science Centre. The results indicate that the PIDA has moderately good intra-rater reliability (ICC=0.67) and very good inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.87). The PIDA provides quantitative data that will be helpful to occupational therapists who prescribe power mobility devices and implement training programmes.
BadkeM., Di FabioR., LeonardE., VargolisM., & FrankeT. (1993). Reliability of a functional assessment tool with application to neurologically impaired patients: A preliminary report. Physiotherapy Canada, 45, 15–20.
2.
BartkoJ., & CarpenterW. (1976). On the methods and theory of reliability. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 163, 307–317.
3.
BensonJ., & ClarkF. (1982). A guide for instrument development and validation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 789–800.
4.
BombardierC., & TugwellP. (1982). A methodological framework to develop and select indices for clinical trials: Statistical and judgemental approaches. The Journal of Rheumatology, 9, 753–762.
5.
BombardierC., & TugwellP. (1987). Methodological considerations in functional assessment. Journal of Rheumatology, 14 (Supp. 15), 6–10.
6.
ButlerC., OkamotoG., & McKayT. (1984). Motorized wheelchair driving by disabled children. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 65, 95–97.
7.
CalderC., & KirbyR. (1990). Fatal wheelchair-related accidents in the United States. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 69, 184–190.
8.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1991). Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred practice. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications.
9.
ChiulliC., Corradi-ScaliseD., & Donatelli-SchultheissL. (1988). Powered mobility vehicles as aids in independent locomotion for young children. Physical Therapy, 68, 997–999.
10.
CookC., & SemmlerC. (1991). Ethical dilemmas in driver reeducation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 517–522.
11.
Data Management Service & Center for Functional Assessment Research (1990). Guide for use of the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation (Version 30). Buffalo: Research Foundation, State University of New York.
12.
DickJ., GuiloffR., StewartA., BlackstockJ., BielawskaC., PaulE., & MarsdenC. (1984). Mini-Mental State Examination in neurological patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 47, 496–499.
13.
DonnerA., & EliasziwM. (1987). Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 6, 441–448.
14.
FeinsteinA. (1983). An additional basic science for clinical medicine: IV. The development of clinimetrics. Annals of Internal Medicine, 99, 843–848.
15.
FeinsteinA. (1987). Clinimetrics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
16.
FinkA., KosecoffJ., ChassinM., & BrookR. (1984). Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use. American Journal of Public Health, 74, 979–983.
17.
FleissJ. (1986). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
18.
HaysR., JaffeK., & IngmanE. (1985). Accidental death associated with motorized wheelchair use: A case report. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66, 709–710.
19.
IversenI., SilberbergN., SteverR., & SchoeningH. (1973). The Revised Kenny Self Care Evaluation: A numerical measure of independence in activities of daily living. Sister Kenny Institute Publications Office 800 East 28th St. at Chicago Ave., Minneapolis, MN, 55407.
20.
KirshnerB., & GuyattG. (1985). A methodologic framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38, 27–36.
21.
KramerM., & FeinsteinA. (1981). Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 29, 111–123.
22.
LawM. (1987). Measurement in occupational therapy: Scientific criteria for evaluation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 133–138.
23.
MolloyD., AlemayehuE., & RobertsR. (1991). Reliability of a standardized Mini-Mental State Examination compared with the traditional Mini-Mental State Examination. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 102–105.
24.
MalouinF., BoiteauM., BonneauC., PichardL., & BravoG. (1989). Use of a hand-held dynamometer for the evaluation of spasticity in a clinical setting: A reliability study. Physiotherapy Canada, 41, 126–134.
25.
McDowellI., & NewellC. (1987). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
26.
ReedR., YochumK., & SchlossM. (1993). Platform motorized wheelchairs in congregate care centers: A survey of usage and safety. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 101–3.
27.
StreinerD., & NormanG. (1989). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
28.
YorkJ. (1989). Mobility methods selected for use in home and community environments. Physical Therapy, 69, 736–747.
