Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex medical condition that can be difficult to monitor.
Purpose.
This study aimed to establish a common set of validated outcome measures specifically for SCI clinical practice.
Method.
In a three-round online Delphi process, experts in SCI care across Canada suggested and ranked outcome measures for clinical practice. The facilitators provided feedback between rounds and determined if consensus (at least 75% agreement) was reached on a single outcome measure per clinical area.
Findings.
One hundred and forty-eight outcome measures were initially considered for inclusion. After three rounds, consensus was reached for 23 out of 30 clinical areas. In the remaining seven, more than one outcome measure was recommended. The final toolkit comprises 33 outcome measures with sufficient measurement properties for use with a SCI population.
Implications.
An outcome measures toolkit validated specifically for SCI should lead to improved identification of best practice and enable clinicians to monitor client progress effectively.
AkinsR. B.TolsonH.ColeB. R. (2005). Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: Application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 5, Article 37. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-37
2.
AlexanderM.AndersonK.Biering-SorensenF.BlightA.BrannonR.BryceT.…WhiteneckG. (2009). Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: Recent assessments and recommendations for future directions. Spinal Cord, 47, 582–591. doi:10.1038/sc.2009.18
3.
American Spinal Injury Association. (2002). International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injury Association.
4.
AndresenE. M.FoutsB. S.RomeisJ. C.BrownsonC. A. (1999). Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 877–884. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90077-1
5.
AndrewsA. W.ThomasM. W.BohannonR. W. (1996). Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers. Physical Therapy, 76, 248–259.
6.
AshworthB. (1964). Preliminary trial of carisoprodol in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner, 192, 540–542.
7.
Bates-JensenB. M.VredevoeD. L.BrechtM. L. (1992). Validity and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool. Decubitus, 5, 20–28.
8.
BergK.Wood-DauphineS.WilliamsJ. I.GaytonD. (1989). Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada, 41, 304–311. doi:10.3138/ptc.41.6.304
9.
BergstromN.BradenB. J.LaguzzaA.HolmanV. (1987). The Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk. Nursing Research, 36, 205–210. doi:10.1097/00006199-198707000-00002
10.
BieriD.ReeveR.ChampionG.AddicoatL.ZieglerJ. B. (1990). The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: Development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain, 41, 139–150.
11.
Biering-SørensenF.CharlifueS.DeVivoM.NoonanV.PostM.StriplingT.WingP. (2006). International spinal cord injury data sets. Spinal Cord, 44, 530–534. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101930
BohannonR. W.SmithM. B. (1987). Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Physical Therapy, 67, 206–207.
14.
BouhassiraD.AttalN.AlchaarH.BoureauF.BrochetB.BruxelleJ.,…VicautE. (2005). Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain, 114, 29–36. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010
15.
CardenasD. D.TurnerJ. A.WarmsC. A.MarshallH. M. (2002). Classification of chronic pain associated with spinal cord injuries. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 1708–1714. doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.35651
16.
CatzA.ItzkovichM.AgranovE.RingH.TamirA. (1997). SCIM: Spinal Cord Independence Measure. A new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord, 35, 850–856. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100504
17.
CharltonJ. R. H. (2004). Delphi technique. In Lewis-BeckM. S.BrymanA.LiaoT. F. (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 245–246). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
CrapoR.CasaburiR.CoatesA.EnrightP.MacIntyreN.McKayR.,…ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. (2002). ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 166, 111–117. doi:10.1164/rccm.166/1/111
19.
CravenC.HitzigS. L.MittmannN. (2012). Impact of impairment and secondary health conditions on health preference among Canadians with chronic spinal cord injury. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 35, 361–370. doi:10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000046
20.
DemersL.Weiss-LambrouR.SkaB. (2002). The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability, 14, 101–105.
21.
DitunnoJ. F.DitunnoP. L.GrazianiV.ScivolettoG.BernardiM.CastellanoV.…NanceP. (2000). Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): An international multicenter validity and reliability study. Spinal Cord, 38, 234–243. doi:10.1038/ sj.sc.3100993
22.
DobkinB. H. (2009). Motor rehabilitation after stroke, traumatic brain, and spinal cord injury: Common denominators within recent clinical trials. Current Opinion in Neurology, 22, 563–569. doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283314b11
23.
DrydenD. M.SaundersL. D.RoweB. H.MayL. A.YiannakouliasN.SvensonL. W.…VoaklanderD. C. (2004). Utilization of health services following spinal cord injury: A 6-year follow-up study. Spinal Cord, 42, 513–525. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101629
EwingJ. A. (1984). Detecting alcoholism: The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA, 252(14), 1905–1907. doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03350140051025
26.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
27.
FreynhagenR.BaronR.GockelU.TölleT. R. (2006). PainDETECT: A new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 22, 1911–1920. doi:10.1185/030079906X132488
HarveyL. A.BattyJ.FaheyA. (1998). Reliability of a tool for assessing mobility in wheelchair-dependent paraplegics. Spinal Cord, 36, 427–431. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100636
30.
HassonF.KeeneyS.McKennaH. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 1008–1015. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01567.x
31.
HermannR. C.PalmerH.LeffS.ShwartzM.ProvostS.ChanJ.…LagodmosG. (2004). Achieving consensus across diverse stakeholders on quality measures for mental healthcare. Medical Care, 42, 1246–1253. doi:10.1097/00005650-200412000-00012
32.
HolbrookM.SkilbeckC. E. (1983). An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 12, 166–170. doi:10.1093/ageing/12.2.166
33.
HoweJ. A.InnessE. L.VenturiA.WilliamsJ. I.VerrierM. C. (2006). The Community Balance and Mobility Scale: A balance measure for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20, 885–895. doi:10.1177/0269215506072183
34.
HsuC. C.SanfordB. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12, Article 10. Retrieved fromhttp://pareonline.net/pdf/v12n10.pdf
35.
JebsenR. H.TaylorN.TrieschmannR. B.TrotterM. J.HowardL. A. (1969). An objective and standardized test of hand function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 50, 311–319.
36.
JetteA. M.KeysorJ. J. (2002). Uses of evidence in disability outcomes and effectiveness research. Milbank Quarterly, 80, 325–345.
37.
JohnstonM.GravesD. (2008). Towards guidelines for evaluation of measures: An introduction with application to spinal cord injury. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 31, 13–26.
38.
JutaiaJ.DaybH. (2002). Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technology and Disability, 14, 107–111.
39.
Kalsi-RyanS.CurtA.FehlingsM.VerrierM. (2009). Assessment of the hand in tetraplegia using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): Impairment versus function. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 14, 34–46.
40.
KruegerH.NoonanV. K.TrenamanL. M.JoshiP.RiversC. S. (2013). The economic burden of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada. Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada, 33, 113–122.
41.
LawM. (1987). Measurement in occupational therapy: Scientific criteria for evaluation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 133–138. doi:10.1177/000841748705400308
42.
LovibondS. H.LovibondP. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Psychology Foundation.
43.
LudwigB. (1997). Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology. Journal of Extension, 35, Article 5TOT2. Retrieved fromhttps://www.joe.org/joe/1997october/tt2.php
44.
MarinoR. J.SheaJ. A.StinemanM. G. (1998). The Capabilities of Upper Extremity Instrument: Reliability and validity of a measure of functional limitation in tetraplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 1512–1521. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90412-9
45.
MathiasS.NayakU. S.IsaacsB. (1986). Balance in elderly patients: The ‘get-up and go’ test. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67, 387–389.
46.
MathiowetzV.GloriaV.KashmanN.WeberK. (1985). Adult norms for the Box and Block test of Manual Dexterity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 386–391.
47.
MayL. A.WarrenS. (2002). Measuring quality of life of persons with spinal cord injury: External and structural validity. Spinal Cord, 40, 341–350. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101311
48.
MulcaheyM. J.HutchinsonD.KozinS. H. (2007). Assessment of upper limb in tetraplegia: Considerations in evaluation and outcomes research. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 44, 91–101. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2005.10.0167
NoonanV. K.FingasM.FarryA.BaxterD.SinghA.FehlingsM. G.DvorakM. F. (2012). Incidence and prevalence of spinal cord injury in Canada: A national perspective. Neuroepidemiology, 38, 219–226. doi:10.1159/000336014
51.
PennR. D.SavoyS. M.CorcosD.LatashM.GottliebG.ParkeB.KroinJ. (1989). Intrathecal baclofen for severe spinal spasticity. New England Journal of Medicine, 320, 1517–1521. doi:10.1056/NEJM198906083202303
52.
PowellC. (2003). The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41, 376–382. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x
53.
PullmanS. L.GoodinD. S.MarquinezA. I.TabbalS.RubinM. (2000). Clinical utility of surface EMG: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology, 55, 171–177. doi:10.1212/WNL.55.2.171
54.
RaichleK. A.OsborneT. L.JensenM. P.CardenasD. (2006). The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with spinal cord injury. Journal of Pain, 7, 179–186. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2005.10.007
RosenR.BrownC.HeimanJ.LeiblumS.MestonC.ShabsighR.…D’AgostinoR.Jr (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208.
57.
RosenR.RileyA.WagnerG.OsterlohI. H.KirkpatrickJ.MishraA. (1997). The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology, 49, 822–830.
58.
SalzbergC. A.ByrneD. W.CaytenC. G.van NiewerburghP.MurphyJ. G.ViehbeckM. (1996). A new pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for individuals with spinal cord injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 75, 96–104.
59.
SchererM. J.CushmanL. A. (2001). Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: A validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. Disability & Rehabilitation, 23, 387–393. doi:10.1080/09638280010006665
60.
SkinnerA.Turner-StokesL. (2006). The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20, 609–615. doi:10.1191/ 0269215506cr981oa
61.
SmithA. W.KirtleyC.JamshidiM. (2000). Intrarater reliability of manual passive movement velocity in the clinical evaluation of knee extensor muscle tone. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1428–1431. doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.9399
62.
SmithH. B. (1973). Smith Hand Function Evaluation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 27, 244–251.
63.
SollermanC.EjeskärA. (1995). Sollerman Hand Function Test: A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 29, 167–176. doi:10.3109/02844319509034334
64.
Spinal Cord Injury Knowledge Mobilization Network. (2014). What is SCI KMN?Retrieved fromhttp://www.scikmn.com
65.
SpitzerR. L.KroenkeK.WilliamsJ. B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. JAMA, 282(18), 1737–1744. doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737
66.
TaleporosG.McCabeM. P. (2002). Development and validation of the Physical Disability Sexual and Body Esteem Scale. Sexuality and Disability, 20, 159–176.
67.
TaylorW. J.SchumacherH. R.JrBarafH. S. B.ChapmanP.StampL.DohertyM.…BarskovaV. (2008). A modified Delphi exercise to determine the extent of consensus with OMERACT outcome domains for studies of acute and chronic gout. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 67, 888–891. doi:10.1136/ard.2007.079970
68.
van der PuttenJ. J. M. F.HobartJ. C.FreemanJ. A.ThompsonA. J. (1999). Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 66, 480–484. doi:10.1136/jnnp.66.4.480
69.
van HedelH. J.WirzM.DietzV. (2005). Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: Validity and reliability of 3 walking tests. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 190–196. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.010
70.
WadeD. T. (2004). Assessment, measurement and data collection tools. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18, 233–237. doi:10.1191/0269215504cr183ed
71.
WareJ. E., Jr.SherbourneC. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.
72.
WeiglM.CiezaA.AndersenC.KolleritsB.AmannE.StuckiG. (2004). Identification of relevant ICF categories in patients with chronic health conditions: A Delphi exercise. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36(Suppl. 44), 12–21. doi:10.1080/ 16501960410015443
WhiteneckG. G.CharlifueS. W.GerhartK. A.OverholserJ. D.RichardsonG. N. (1992). Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 519–526.
75.
WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.
76.
WongJ. Y.FungB. K.ChuM. M.ChanR. K. (2007). The use of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire in rehabilitation after acute traumatic hand injuries. Journal of Hand Therapy, 20, 49–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
