The development of a scientific based practice is essential if occupational therapists are to defend their practice against scepticism and budget cuts. In order to equip the profession with the skills necessary to develop a scientific basis for practice, it is generally considered that graduate programs in occupational therapy should be initiated. This paper argues that to be most effective a specific kind of graduate program is required — one based on the scientist-practitioner model. This model provides for the dual education of professionals as clinicians and researchers. In occupational therapy the undergraduate curricula already provide excellent education in clinical interventions. Thus, it is the role of the graduate curricula to provide education in methods of scientific inquiry and their application to clinical practice. The composition of such a curriculum is described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcquavivaF.A. (1986). Editorial — AOTA's Ad Hoc Commission on occupational therapy manpower. Part I: Summary of findings. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 455–458.
2.
BarerM.L.EvansR.G.StoddartG.L. (1979). Controlling health care costs by direct charges to patients: Snare or delusion?Toronto: Ontario Economic Council.
3.
BarlowD.J.HayesS.C.NelsonR.O., (1984). The scientist practitioner research and accountability in clinical & educational settings, Toronto: Pergamon Press.
4.
BarrisR.KielhofnerG. (1985). Generating and using knowledge in occupational therapy: Implications for professional education. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 5, 113–124.
5.
BlomquistA. (1979). The health care business: International evidence on private versus public health care systems. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.
6.
ClarkF.SharrotG.HillD.J.CampbellS. (1985). A comparison of impact of undergraduate and graduate occupational therapy education on professional productivity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 155–162.
7.
ChristiansenC.H. (1981). Editorial: Towards resolution of crisis: Research requisites in occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 1, 115–124.
8.
ComanorW.S. (1980). National health insurance in Ontario: The effects of a policy of cost control. Washington: American Enterprise Institute Studies in Health Policy.
9.
ConineT.A. (1972). Dilemmas of research in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26, 81–84.
10.
CrispoJ. (1979). Mandate for Canada. Don Mills: General Publishing.
11.
DriverM.F. (1968). A philosophic view of the history of occupational therapy in Canada. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 35, 53–60.
12.
ErnestM. (1972). The changing role of the occupational therapist. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of British Columbia.
13.
The Foundation. (1983). Research competencies: for clinicians and educators. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 44–46.
14.
FranciscusN.L. (1974). Graduate education: The third dimension. In Proceedings of The World Federation of Occupational Therapists. Vancouver, British Columbia.
15.
GilfoyleE.M. (1986). Editorial: Professional directions: Management in action. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 593–596.
16.
GilfoyleE.M. (1984). Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lectureship, 1984: Transformation of a profession. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38, 575–584.
17.
GilkesonG.E.HantenW.P. (1984). A comparative analysis of occupational therapy graduates from baccalaureate and entry-level master's degree programs. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 4, 67–95.
18.
GilletteN. (1982). A data base for occupational therapy: Documentation through research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 449–501.
19.
Harvey-KreftingL. (1985). The use of conceptual models in clinical practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 173–178.
20.
HopkinsH.L. (1983). An historical perspective on occupational therapy. In HopkinsH.L.SmithH.D. (Eds.). Willard and Spackman's Occupational Therapy, 6th edition, Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co.
21.
JantzenA.C. (1978). Educational patterns for professional development. In O'SheaB. (Ed.), Proceedings symposium on occupational therapy delivery patterns and manpower planning. (Sponsored by Health and Welfare Canada (projet #6613-1129-50) and the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists).
22.
JohnsonJ. (1978). Nationally speaking: Issues in education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 32, 355–358.
23.
Le VesconteH.P. (1935). Expanding fields of occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 3, 4–12.
24.
LlorensL.A.GilletteN.P. (1985). The challenge for research in a practice profession. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 143–145.
25.
KielhofnerG. (1985). The demise of diffidence: An agenda for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 165–171.
26.
KielhofnerG. (1986a). A review of research on the model of human occupation: Part One. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 69–74.
27.
KielhofnerG. (1986b). A review of research on the model of human occupation: Part Two. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 129–134.
28.
MacKinnonJ.R. (1985). Current supply and future requirements for occupational therapy manpower in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 251–257.
29.
MacKinnonJ.PolatajkoH.HarburnK.PosthumaB. (1985). A needs study for graduate education in occupational therapy. Unpublished manuscript.
30.
MadillH.M.CardwellT.RobinsonI.BrintnellS.E. (1986). Old themes, new directions — Occupational Therapy in the 21st Century. Canadian Joumal of Occupational Therapy, 53, Commemorative Issue 38–44.
31.
MaloneR.A. (1986). In Memoriam: Alice Catherine Jantzen 1918–1983. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 123–124.
32.
MaxwellJ.D.MaxwellM.P. (1978). Occupational Therapy: The diffident profession. Kingston: Queens University.
33.
OttenbacherK.BarrisR.Van DeusenJ. (1986). Some issues related to research utilization in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 111–116.
34.
ParhamD. (1985). Academic reward structures and occupational therapy faculty Part II: Predictors of rewards and scholarly productivity. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 5, 139–153.
35.
PrendergastN. (1978). The challenge of education: influencing change in professional practice. In O'SheaB. (Ed.), Proceedings symposium on occupational therapy delivery patterns and manpower planning. (Sponsored by Health and Welfare Canada (project #6613-1129-50) and the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists).
36.
RauschG.MelvinJ.L. (1986). Editorial: A new era in acute care. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 319–322.
37.
RobinsonI.M. (1981). Muriel Driver Memorial Lecture 1981: The mists of time. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 145–152.
38.
RogersJ.C. (1980). Design of the master's degree in occupational therapy, Part 2. An empirical approach. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 176–184.
39.
RogersJ.C.MannW.C. (1980a). The relationship between professional productivity and educational level, Part 1. Review of the literature and methodology. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 387–392.
40.
RogersJ.C.MannW.C. (1980b). The relationship between professional productivity and educational level, Part 2. Results and discussion. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 460–468.
41.
Van DeusenJ. (1985). Relationship of occupational therapists’ education and experience to perceived value of theory development. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 5, 223–231.
42.
WoodP.MadillH. (1985). Occupational Therapy graduate program needs: Part II. Therapists’ and administrators’ perspectives in the three prairie provinces. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 125–131.
43.
YerxaE.J. (1982). A response to testing and measurement in occupational therapy: A review of current practice with special emphasis on the Southern California Sensory Integration Tests. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 399–404.
44.
YerxaE.SharrottG. (1986). Liberal Arts: The foundation for occupational therapy education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 153–159.
