This paper is an introduction to the use of conceptual models in clinical practice. Theoretical terminology is defined using common examples in occupational therapy. The significance of models to clinicians, administrators, and researchers is discussed. Characteristics of a rigorous model are presented in order that the existing models may be assessed for their effectiveness in guiding practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AyresA. J. (1963). The development of perceptual motor abilities. A theoretical basis for treatment of dysfunction. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17, 221–225.
2.
AzimaH.AzimaF. (1959). Outline of dynamic theory of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13, 215–221.
3.
BanusB.KentC.NortonY.SukiennickD.BeckerL. (1979). The developmental therapist. (2nd ed.) Thorofare, N.J.: Charles B. Slack.
4.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1983). Guidelines for the client-centred practice of Occupational Therapy. Ottawa: Health and Welfare Canada.
5.
ConteJ.ConteW. (1977). The use of conceptual models in occupational therapy practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31, 262–264.
6.
CubieS.KaplanK. (1982). A case analysis method for the model of human occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 647–656.
7.
FidlerJ.FidlerG. (1954). Introduction to psychiatric occupational therapy. New York: Macmillan.
8.
JohnsonJ.KielhofnerG. (1983). Occupational therapy in the health care system of the future. In KielhofnerG. (ed) Health through occupation. Theory and practice in occupational therapy. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
9.
KielhofnerG. (1980a). A model of human occupation. Part II. Otogenesis from the perspective of temporal adaptation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 657–666.
10.
KielhofnerG. (1980b). A model of human occupation. Part III. Benign and vicious cycles. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 731–734.
11.
KielhofnerG.BurkeJ. (1980) A model of human occupation. Part I. Conceptual framework and content. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 572–581.
12.
KielhofnerG.BurkeJ. (1983). The evolution of knowledge and practice in occupational therapy. In KielhofnerG. (ed) Health through occupation. Theory and practice in occupational therapy. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co.
13.
KielhofnerG.BurkeJ.IgiC. (1980). A model of human occupation. Part IV. Assessment and intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy34, 777–788.
14.
KircherM. (1984). Motivation as a factor of perceived exertion in purposeful versus non-purposeful activity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38, 165–170.
15.
KuhnT. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
LlorensL. (1976). Application of a developmental theory for health and rehabilitaiton. Rockville, Md.: American Occupational Therapy Association.
17.
MaillouxZ.MackW.CooperC. (1983). Knowing what to do: The organization of knowledge for clinical practice. In KielhofnerG. (ed) Health through occupation. Theory and practice in occupational therapy. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co.
18.
MeyerA. (1977). The philosophy of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31, 639–642.
19.
MoseyA. (1981). Occupational therapy. Configuration of a profession. New York: Raven Press.
20.
PaytonO. (1979). Research: The validation of clinical practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
21.
ReedK. (1984). Models of practice in occupational therapy. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
22.
ReillyM. (1962). Occupational therapy can be one of the great ideas of the 20th century. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16, 1–9.
23.
RoodM. (1956), Neurophysiological mechanisms utilized in treatment of neuromuscular dysfunction. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 10, 220–225.
24.
WiemerR. (1972). Some concepts of prevention as an aspect of community health. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26, 1–9.
