This paper examines the status of occupational therapy as a profession. Achievement of status as a full-fledged profession will depend on the success with which this group convinces members of society that the work it does is non-substitutable. It is difficult for occupational therapists to prove there is no legal substitute for the services they offer. This factor will likely limit attainment of status as a full-fledged profession.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
C.A.O.T. Annual Committee Reports. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1975, 4, 135.
2.
ErnestM.L.The changing role of the occupational therapist. Unpublished masters thesis, University of British Columbia, 1972.
3.
FidlerG.Professional or nonprofessional. Occupational therapy 2001. Paper presented at the special session of the representative assembly, American Occupational Therapy Association, 1978.
4.
GilletteN.KielhofnerG.The impact of specialization on the professionalization and survival of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1979, 33, 20–28.
5.
GoodeW.The librarian: From occupation to profession. The Library Quarterly, 1961, 31, 306–318.
6.
JohnsonJ.A.Humanitarianism and accountability: A challenge for occupational therapy on its 60th anniversary. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1977, 31, 631–637.
7.
JohnsonT.J.Professions and power. London: MacMillan Press, 1972.
8.
KielhofnerG.Theoretical foundations of occupational therapy. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists, Hamburg, 1982.
9.
KielhofnerG.BurkeJ.P.A model of human occupation, Part 1. Structure and content. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1980, 34, 572–581.
10.
KielhofnerG.BurkeJ.P.The evolution of knowledge and practice in occupational therapy: Past, present and future. In KielhofnerG. (ed.), Health through occupation: Theory and practice in occupational therapy. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co., 1983.
11.
LeviM.Functional redundancy and the process of professionalization: The case of registered nurses in the United States. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1980, 5, 333–353.
12.
MaxwellJ.D.MaxwellM.P.Occupational therapy: the diffident profession. Queen's University Study of Occupational Therapy, 1977.
13.
MooreW.The professions: roles and rules. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1974.
14.
O'SheaB.Why research?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1974, 41, 78–81.
15.
ReedK.L.Models of practice in occupational therapy. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984.
16.
ReedK.L.SandersonS.R.Concepts of occupational therapy. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1983.
17.
RogersJ.C.The study of human occupation. In KielhofnerG. (ed.), Health through occupation: Theory and practice in occupational therapy. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co., 1983.
18.
VollmerH.MillsD.Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1966.
19.
WiemerRuth. Traditional and nontraditional practice arenas. Occupational Therapy: 2001. Paper presented at the special session of the representative assembly, American Occupational Therapy Association, 1978.
