This paper considers the relationship between the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists and the provincial occupational therapy associations with a view to strengthen this collaboration by means of affiliate status for provincial bodies. Recommendations are made concerning the functions and responsibilities of both levels of professional organizations as well as the direct benefits to the members.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MaxwellJ.D.MaxwellM.P.Occupational Therapy: The Diffident Profession. Health and Welfare Canada Grant #606-1242-46, Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, Kingston: 1977,: p. 48.
2.
MaxwellJ.D.MaxwellM.P. p. 69.
3.
Kates, Peat, Marwick & Co.Organization Review of National Office: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, Toronto: August, 1971.
4.
MadillH.M.: Letter To The Editor, Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 44: 179, 1977.
5.
BrintnellS.: “Report to AAROT from Alberta Director, April 30, 1977”.
6.
MadillH.M. “Report to AAROT from Alberta Director, February 18, 1978”.
7.
CAOT Standing Orders, October 1974. P. 3, Item 14.
8.
What's It All About. Institute of Chartered Accountants of Alberta. August, 1976.
9.
JohnsonJ.A.: Challenges Confronting Occupational Therapy, Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 44: 113–117, September, 1977.
10.
JohnsonJ.A.Humanitarianism and Accountability: A Challenge for Occupational Therapy on its 60th Anniversary. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 31: 631–637, Nov–Dec. 1977.
