AbberleyP. (1995). Disabling ideology in health and welfare: The case of occupational therapy. Disability and Society, 10(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599550023660
2.
AbberleyP. (2004). A critique of professional support and intervention. In SwainJ.FrenchS.BarnesC.ThomasC. (Eds.), Disabling barriers - enabling environments (2nd ed.; pp. 239–244). Sage.
FariasL.Laliberte RudmanD. (2019). Practice analysis: critical reflexivity on discourses constraining socially transformative occupational therapy practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(11), 693–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022619862111
6.
FinlaysonM. L. (2013). Muriel Driver Memorial Lecture 2013: Embracing our role as change agents. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 80(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417413499505
7.
FrenchS.SwainJ. (2001). The relationship between disabled people and health and welfare professionals. In AlbrechtG. L.SeelmanK. D.BuryM. (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 734–753). Sage.
8.
HammellK. W. (2013). Client-centred practice in occupational therapy: Critical reflections. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(3), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2012.752032
9.
HammellK. W. (2019). Building globally relevant occupational therapy from the strength of our diversity. World Federation of Occupational Therapists’ Bulletin, 75(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2018.1529480
10.
Laliberte RudmanD. (2021). Mobilizing occupation for social transformation: Radical resistance, disruption, and re-configuration. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 88(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174211020836
11.
MondacaM. (2021). “Doing hope” as a possible way towards a responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 28(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1797858
OslerJ. (2022, January 22). Opportunities for White people in the fight for racial justice. https://www.whitecomplices.org.
14.
PalmaterP. (2014). Genocide, Indian policy, and legislated elimination of Indians in Canada. Aboriginal Policy Studies, 3(3), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.5663/aps.v3i3.22225
15.
PicotinJ.BeaudoinM.HélieS.MartinA-ÉCarrierA. (2021). Occupational therapists as change agents: exploring factors that influence their actions. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 88(3), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174211022891
16.
RamugondoE. (2018). Healing work: intersections for decoloniality. World Federation of Occupational Therapists’ Bulletin, 74(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2018.1523981
17.
SullivanM. J. L.MainC. (2007). Service, advocacy and adjudication: Balancing the ethical challenges of multiple stakeholder agendas in the rehabilitation of chronic pain. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(20-21), 1596–1603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701618802
18.
TitchkoskyT. (2003). Disability, self and society. University of Toronto Press.
19.
TurcotteP.-L.HolmesD. (2021). The (dis)obedient occupational therapist: A reflection on dissent against disciplinary propaganda. Caderos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional, 29, Article e2924. https://doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.ctoARF2211
20.
ZafranH. (2021). Lost in translation: The languages of a critical occupational therapy. OT Now, 23(6), 23–25.