Engagement of Occupational Therapy Organizations with Public Policy: A Qualitative Analysis

Abstract

French

Background.

Public policy is an important feature of occupational therapy practice. Occupational therapy organizations have a mandate to engage in policy processes to improve the conditions for clients, including the nature of care received.

Purpose.

Describe the approaches that Canadian occupational therapy organizations use to engage with and impact public policy.

Methods.

This study used interpretive description methodology. Participants were recruited from Canadian occupational therapy professional organizations. Participants shared their experiences and perspectives on policy engagement through semi-structured interviews. Data was analyzed inductively.

Findings.

Engagement with policy involved reaching out (building relationships, educating practitioners about policy and occupational therapy contributions, and developing statements), and reaching in (consulting with occupational therapists and generating data informing policy).

Implications.

Occupational therapy organizations can share and coordinate approaches to impact public policy and advocate for both clients and the profession. Future research can expand this analysis in other contexts to generate a deeper understanding of engagement.

Keywords

Advocacy Policy-making*Professional competence*

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aronson

(1995). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1), 1–3. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol2/iss1/3

Association of Canadian Occupational Therapy Regulatory Organizations. (1989). Governance. https://www.acotro-acore.org/about-us/governance

Cairney

(2012). Understanding public policy: Theories and issues. Basingstoke and Palgrave Macmillan.

Cairney

Weible

(2017). The new policy sciences: Combining the cognitive science of choice, multiple theories of context, and basic and applied analysis. Policy Sciences: Integrating Knowledge and Practice to Advance Human Dignity, 50(4), 619–627. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9304-2

Canadian Assocation of Occupational Therapists (2020). Who We Are and What We Do. https://www.caot.ca/site/wwa/whoweare?nav=sidebar

College of Family Physicians. (2017). Government relations. http://www.cfpc.ca/GovernmentRelations/

Dudovskiy

(2011). Purposive Sampling. Research Methodology. http://research-methodology.net/sampling-in-primary-data-collection/purposive-sampling/

Dyminick

Wandersman

Osher

Grigorescu

Huang

(2014). Willing, able, ready: Basics and policy implications of readiness as a key component for implementation of evidence-based interventions [issue brief]. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE). https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/77076/ib_Readiness.pdf

Edwards

Dirette

(2010). The relationship between professional identity and burnout among occupational therapists. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 24(2), 119–129. http://doi.org/10.3109/07380570903329610

10.

Evertsson

Lindqvist

(2005). Welfare state and women’s work: The professional projects of nurses and occupational therapists in Sweden. Nursing Inquiry, 12(4), 256–268. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2005.00289.x

11.

Finlayson

M. L.

(2013). Muriel driver memorial lecture 2013: Embracing our role as change agents. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 80(4), 205–213. http://doi.org/10.1177/0008417413499505).

12.

Graff

M. J.

Adang

E. M.

Vernooij-Dassen

M. J.

Dekker

Jönsson

Thijssen

Hoefnagels

Rikkert

M. G. O.

(2008). Community occupational therapy for older patients with dementia and their care givers: cost effectiveness study. BMJ, 336(7636), 134–138. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39408.481898.BE

13.

Guba

E. G.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). SAGE Publications.

14.

Hemmingsson

Jonsson

(2005). The issue is- An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the international classification of functioning, disability and health- Some critical remarks. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(5), 569–576. http://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.59.5.569

15.

Hunt

M.R.

(2009). Strengths and challenges in the use on interpretive description: Reflections arising from a study of the moral experience of health professionals in humanitarian work. Qualitative Health Research, 19(9), 1284–92. http://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309344612

16.

Jossens

M. O.

(1997). Strategies for the development of contemporary nursing policy. Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 13(4). http://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(97)80092-0

17.

Kingdon

J. W.

(2011). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (Updated 2nd ed.). Longman.

18.

Lavis

(2006). Research, public policymaking, and knowledge-translation processes: Canadian efforts to build bridges. Journal of Continuing Education in The Health Professions, 26(1), 37–45. http://doi.org/10.1002/chp.49

19.

Law

Cooper

Strong

Stewart

Rigby

Letts

(1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(1), 9–23. http://doi.org/10.1177/000841749606300103

20.

Leblanc

Kinsella

(2016). Toward epistemic justice: A critically reflexive examination of “sanism” and implications for knowledge generation. Studies in Social Justice, 10(1), 59–78. http://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v10i1.1324

21.

Lencucha

Shikako-Thomas

(2019). Examining the intersection of policy and occupational therapy: A scoping review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 86(3), 185–195. http://doi.org/10.1177/0008417419833183

22.

Mackenzie

Knipe

(2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in Education Research, 16(2), 193–205.

23.

Mahaffey

Burson

K. A.

Januszewski

Pitts

D. B.

Preissner

(2015). Role for occupational therapy in community mental health: Using policy to advance scholarship of ractice. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 29(4), 397–410. http://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2015.1051689

24.

McGuinness

Slaughter

(2019). The new practice of public problem solving. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_new_practice_of_public_problem_solving

25.

Nilsson

Townsend

(2010). Occupational justice-bridging theory and practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17(1), 57–63. http://doi.org/10.3109/11038120903287182

26.

Oliver

Innvar

Lorenc

Woodman

Thomas

(2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1). http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2

27.

Rivard

Hollis

Darrah

Madill

Warren

(2005). Therapists’ perspectives on the management and delivery of occupational therapy and physical therapy services. Healthcare Management Forum, 18(2), 9–13. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60348-1

28.

Rowles

G. D.

(1991). Beyond performance: Being in place as a component of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 265–271. http://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.3.265

29.

Shenton

A. K.

(2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. http://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201

30.

Streeck

Schmitter

(1985). Community, market, state-and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. European Sociological Review, 1(2), 119–138. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036381

31.

Thomas

P. A.

Shelton

C. R.

(1994). Teaching students to become active in public policy. Public Health Nursing, 11(2), 75–79. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.1994.tb00772.x

32.

Thorne

Kirkham

S. R.

O’Flynn-Magee

(2004). The analytic challenge in interpretive description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300101

33.

Torjman

(2005). What is policy? Caledon Institute of Social Policy.

34.

Townsend

(1993). Occupational therapy’s social vision. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(4), 174–184. http://doi.org/10.1177/000841749306000403

35.

Tricco

Cardoso

Thomas

Motiwala

Sullivan

Kealey

Hemmelgarn

Ouimet

Hillmer

Perrier

Shepperd

Straus

(2016). Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: A scoping review. Implementation Science, 11(1), 4–4. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0370-1

36.

Weible

Sabatier

(2018). Theories of the policy process (4th ed.). Westview Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.12 MB