Previous literature examined tactile and proprioceptive changes after stroke; however, the lived experience of changes in all sensory systems is still a gap in the literature.
Purpose.
To gain understanding of stroke survivors’ experience of sensory changes and how sensory changes impact participation in daily life activities.
Method.
This study utilized a qualitative description method. Researchers used semi-structured interviews with probing questions. Inductive content analysis approach was used to analyze the data. Researchers recruited 13 stroke survivors ≤75 years old who participated in a community-based stroke program.
Findings.
Emerging themes included daily life impact of sensory function changes, and experience and timing of sensory changes. Participants experienced changes in various sensory systems including touch and proprioception, visual, auditory, and taste. Survivors also reported sensitivity to environmental stimuli. Sensory changes affect survivors’ participation in different aspects of daily life activities. Most participants experienced sensory changes right after their stroke.
Implications.
Results from this study inform health care providers about stroke survivors’ sensory needs to help them design interventions that match their needs.
American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA). (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd edition). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Supplement_1), S1–S48. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.682006
BologniniN.RussoC.EdwardsD. J. (2016). The sensory side of post-stroke motor rehabilitation. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 34(4), 571–586. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-150606
4.
BouffioulxÉ.ArnouldC.ThonnardJ. L. (2011). Satisfaction with activity and participation and its relationships with body functions, activities, or environmental factors in stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(9), 1404–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.031
CarlssonG. E.MöllerA.BlomstrandC. (2009). Managing an everyday life of uncertainty: A qualitative study of coping in persons with mild stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(10), 773–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280802638857
ConnellL. A. (2007). Sensory impairment and recovery after stroke (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham).
9.
ConnellL. (2008). Somatosensory impairment after stroke: Frequency of different deficits and their recovery. Clinical Rehabilitation, 22, 758–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508090674
10.
ConnellL. A.McMahonN. E.AdamsN. (2014). Stroke survivors’ experiences of somatosensory impairment after stroke: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Physiotherapy, 100(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.682006
11.
DoyleS. D.BennettS.DudgeonB. (2014). Upper limb post-stroke sensory impairments: The survivor’s experience. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(12), 993–1000. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.825649
12.
DuttaT. M.JosiahA. F.CroninC. A.WittenbergG. F.ColeJ. W. (2013). Altered taste and stroke: A case report and literature review. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 20(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr2001-78
13.
DyeM. W. G.PascalisO. (2017). Editorial: The sensation-cognition interface—Impact of early sensory experiences on cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1742. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01742
GoodellL. S.StageV. C.CookeN. K. (2016). Practical qualitative research strategies: Training interviewers and coders. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 48(8), 578–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2016.06.001
16.
GraneheimU. H.LundmanB. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
17.
GreenT. L.McGregorL. D.KingK. M. (2008). Smell and taste dysfunction following minor stroke: A case report. Canadian Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 30(2), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr2001-78
18.
GrefkesC.FinkG. R. (2011). Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: New insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain, 134(5), 1264–1276. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr033
19.
GuestG.BunceA.JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
20.
HeckmannJ. G.HeckmannS. M.LangC. J.HummelT. (2003). Neurological aspects of taste disorders. Archives of Neurology, 60(5), 667–671. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.60.5.667
21.
JacobssonC.AxelssonK.WenngrenB. I.NorbergA. (1996). Eating despite severe difficulties: Assessment of poststroke eating. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 5(1), 23–31.
22.
JulkunenL.TenovuoO.JaaskelainenS.HamalainenH. (2005). Recovery of somatosensory deficits in acute stroke. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 111(6), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00393.x
23.
KruithofW. J.PostM. W.Van LeeuwenC. M.SchepersV. P.van den BosG. A.Visser-MeilyJ. (2015). Course of social support and relationships between social support and patients’ depressive symptoms in the first 3 years post-stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 47(7), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1971
24.
LandiF.OnderG.CesariM.ZamboniV.RussoA.BarillaroC.BernabeiR., & The Silvernet-HC study group. (2006). Functional decline in frail community-dwelling stroke patients. European Journal of Neurology, 13(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01116.x
25.
LeopoldD. A.HolbrookE.NoellC.MabryR. (2018). Disorders of taste and smell. Medscape.
MacLeanL. M.MeyerM.EstableA. (2004). Improving accuracy of transcripts in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303259804
28.
PohlP. S.DunnW.BrownC. (2003). The role of sensory processing in the everyday lives of older adults. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 23(3), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740907600205
29.
PolleyD. B.HillockA. R.SpankovichC.PopescuM. V.RoyalD. W.WallaceM. T. (2008). Development and plasticity of intra-and intersensory information processing. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 19(10), 780–798. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.19.10.6
30.
RhodaA. (2012). Limitations in activity and participation experienced by stroke patients: A qualitative inquiry. South African Journal of Physiotherapy, 68(3), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v68i3.20
31.
RossB.JamaliS.TremblayK. L. (2013). Plasticity in neuromagnetic cortical responses suggests enhanced auditory object representation. BMC Neuroscience, 14(1), 151. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/14/151
SandelowskiM. (2008). Theoretical saturation. In GivenL. M. (Ed.) The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE Publciations.
34.
SandelowskiM. (2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing and Health, 33, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362
35.
SchimmelM.VoegeliG.DuvernayE.LeemannB.MüllerF. (2017). Oral tactile sensitivity and masticatory performance are impaired in stroke patients. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 44(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12482
36.
Sullivan-BolyaiS.BovaC.HarperD. (2005). Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: The use of qualitative description. Nursing Outlook, 53(3), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2005.03.005
TysonS. F.HanleyM.ChillalaJ.SelleyA. B.TallisR. C. (2008). Sensory loss in hospital-admitted people with stroke: Characteristics, associated factors, and relationship with function. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22(2), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307305523
39.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). U.S. Census Bureau quick facts.
40.
WallenbertI.JonssonH. (2005). Waiting to get better: A dilemma regarding habits in daily occupations after stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(2), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.59.2.218
