Sensory approaches are often used by Occupational Therapists working with clients with a severe or profound and multiple learning disabilities (SLD/PMLD). The aims of this review were to synthesise the outcomes of sensory approaches for adults with an SLD/PMLD and describe the key intervention components.
Method:
A mixed methods literature review of three databases was completed to identify studies where sensory approaches were used for clients with an SLD/PMLD. Peer-reviewed research articles published between January 1990 and April 2021 were included. Data quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A convergent-segregated approach to synthesis was taken, including thematic analysis of qualitative data and a narrative review of quantitative data.
Results:
Eighteen studies were included. Positive outcomes were reductions in challenging behaviour, stress and improved engagement, attention and communication. Three themes emerged, suggesting important components of sensory approaches for clients with an SLD/PMLD: matching sensory stimuli to the needs of the individual, sensory integration therapists and caregivers as facilitators and increased intervention duration and frequency.
Conclusion:
Evidence suggests that sensory approaches support positive social, emotional and cognitive outcomes for individuals with an SLD/PMLD. Essential features of sensory approaches for this client group are sensitive use of sensory stimuli, skilled facilitators and more intensive intervention protocols.
AshbyMLindsayWRPitcaithlyD, et al. (1995) Snoezelen: Its effects on concentration and responsiveness in people with profound multiple handicaps. British Journal of Occupational Therapy58: 303–307.
2.
BlaskowitzMGJohnsonKRBergfeltT, et al. (2021) Evidence to inform occupational therapy intervention with adults with intellectual disability: A scoping review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy75: 1–25.
3.
BodisonSCParhamLD (2018) Specific sensory techniques and sensory environmental modifications for children and youth with sensory integration difficulties: A systematic review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy72: 72011900401–720119004011.
4.
Bova TomsSJankeMCLoyDP, et al. (2019) Research in recreational therapy practice: Findings and lessons learned from a study of a multisensory environment for adults with autism spectrum disorder. Therapeutic Recreation Journal53: 381–401.
5.
BreslinLGuerraNGanzL, et al. (2020) Clinical utility of multisensory environments for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A scoping review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy74: 74012050601–740120506012.
6.
BundyACSzklutS (2019) The science of intervention: Creating direct intervention from theory. In: BundyALaneS (eds) Sensory Integration: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn.Philadelphia: FA Davis, pp. 300–337.
7.
ChanJSLChienWT (2017) A randomised controlled trial on evaluation of the clinical efficacy of massage therapy in a multisensory environment for residents with severe and profound intellectual disabilities: A pilot study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research61: 532–548.
8.
ChanSWThompsonDRChauJPC, et al. (2010) The effects of multisensory therapy on behaviour of adult clients with developmental disabilities – A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies47: 108–122.
9.
CuvoAJMayMEPostTM (2001) Effects of living room, snoezelen room, and outdoor activities on stereotypic behavior and engagement by adults with profound mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities22: 183–204.
FavaLStraussK (2010) Multi-sensory rooms: Comparing effects of the snoezelen and the stimulus preference environment on the behavior of adults with profound mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities31: 160–171.
12.
GreenDBeatonLMooreD, et al. (2003) Clinical incidence of sensory integration difficulties in adults with learning disabilities and illustration of management. British Journal of Occupational Therapy66: 454–463.
13.
HeyvaertMHannesKOnghenaP (2017) Using mixed methods research synthesis for literature reviews. Los Angeles: SAGE.
14.
HillLTruslerKFurnissF, et al. (2012) Effects of multisensory environments on stereotyped behaviours assessed as maintained by automatic reinforcement. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities25: 509–521.
KaplanHCloptonMKaplanM, et al. (2006) Snoezelen multi-sensory environments: Task engagement and generalization. Research in Developmental Disabilities27: 443–455.
17.
LeongHCarterMStephensonJ (2015) Meta-analysis of research on sensory integration therapy for individuals with developmental and learning disabilities. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities27: 183–206.
MartinNTGaffanEAWilliamsT (1998) Behavioural effects of long-term multi-sensory stimulation. British Journal of Clinical Psychology37: 69–82.
20.
MatsonJLBamburgJWSmallsY (2004) An analysis of snoezelen equipment to reinforce persons with severe or profound mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities25: 89–95.
21.
May-BensonTAKinnealeyM (2012) An approach to assessment of and intervention for adults with sensory processing disorders. OT Practice17: 1–8.
22.
McGillCBreenCJ (2020) Can sensory integration have a role in multi-element behavioural intervention? An evaluation of factors associated with the management of challenging behaviour in community adult learning disability services. British Journal of Learning Disabilities48: 142–153.
23.
MitchellJRVan der GaagA (2002) Through the eye of the cyclops: Evaluating a multi-sensory intervention programme for people with complex disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities30: 159–165.
24.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2015) Challenging Behaviour and Learning Disabilities: Prevention and Interventions for People With Learning Disabilities Whose Behaviour Challenges (NICE guideline NG11) Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng11 (accessed 21 May 2021).
PadillaRDominaA (2016) Effectiveness of sensory stimulation to improve arousal and alertness of people in a coma or persistent vegetative state after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy70: 1–8.
PotterCNWetzelJLLearmanKE (2019) Effect of sensory adaptations for routine dental care in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A preliminary study. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability44: 305–314.
29.
ReismanJ (1993) Using a sensory integrative approach to treat self-injurious behavior in an adult with profound mental retardation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy47: 403–411.
ScanlanJNNovakT (2015) Sensory approaches in mental health: A scoping review. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal62: 277–285.
32.
SchoenSALaneSJMillerLJ (2020) Advances in sensory integration research: Clinically based research. In: BundyACLaneSJMulliganS, et al. (eds) Sensory Integration: Theory and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis, pp.352–370.
33.
SlevinEMcClellandA (1999) Multisensory environments: Are they therapeutic? A single-subject evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of a multisensory environment. Journal of Clinical Nursing8: 48–56.
34.
SoperGThorleyCR (1996) Effectiveness of an occupational therapy programme based on sensory integration theory for adults with severe learning disabilities. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy59: 475–482.
35.
Ten BrugAVan der PuttenAAJPenneA, et al. (2016) Making a difference? A comparison between multi-sensory and regular storytelling for persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research60: 1043–1053.
36.
Ten BrugAMundeVSVan der PuttenAAJ, et al. (2015) Look closer: The alertness of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities during multi-sensory storytelling, a time sequential analysis. European Journal of Special Needs Education30: 535–550.
37.
UrwinRBallingerC (2005) The effectiveness of sensory integration therapy to improve functional behaviour in adults with learning disabilities: Five single-case experimental designs. British Journal of Occupational Therapy68: 56–66.
38.
VlaskampCDe GeeterKIHuijsmansLM, et al. (2003) Passive activities: The effectiveness of multisensory environments on the level of activity of individuals with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities16: 135–143.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
