Background.Occupational therapists are frequently involved in discharge accommodation decision making with older adults. Purpose.The literature regarding this process is reviewed. The ways in which risk avoidance and autonomy promotion philosophies influence decisions are examined and a new approach is proposed. Summary.One approach is based on risk avoidance, where decisional control rests with professionals, but the client is left out of the process. Another is that of autonomy promotion, in which decisional control rests with the client. When risks are high, this can result in ethical dilemmas. The importance of the environment, its relationship to occupational performance, and differing interpretations of client-centred processes are important considerations. Practice Implications.In response to the inadequacy of models grounded in risk avoidance or autonomy promotion, occupational therapists are challenged to move toward a balanced approach to decision making with older people, grounded in partnership, shared power, and negotiation.
AgichG. J. (1990). Reassessing autonomy in long-term care. Hastings Center Report. November/December, 12–17.
2.
BaumC. (1998). Client-centred practice in a changing health care system. In LawM. (Ed.), Client-centered occupational therapy (pp. 29–45). Thorofare NJ: Slack.
3.
BrowneS. (1993). Views from the field: Perspective from Oklahoma. In KaneR. A. & CaplanA. (Eds.), Ethical conflicts in the management of home care: The case manager's dilemma (pp. 79–82). New York: Springer.
4.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
5.
ClarkP. G. (1991). Ethical dimensions of quality of life in aging: Autonomy versus collectivism in the United States and Canada. The Gerontologist, 31, 631–639.
6.
ClemensE. L., & HayesH. E. (1997). Assessing and balancing elder risk, safety and autonomy: Decision-making practices of health care professionals. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 16 (3), 3–20.
7.
ClemensE. L., WetleT., FeltesM., CrabtreeB, & DubitzkyD. (1994). Contraindications in case management: Client-centred theory and directive practice with frail elderly. Journal of Aging and Health, 6, 70–87.
8.
ClemsonL., CusickA., & FozzardC. (1999). Managing risk and exerting control: Determining follow through with falls prevention. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21, 531–541.
9.
ClemsonL., RolandM., & CummingR. G. (1992). Occupational therapy assessment of potential hazards in the homes of elderly people: An inter-rater reliability study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 39 (3), 23–26.
10.
ClemsonL., RolandM., & CummingR. G. (1997). Types of hazards in the homes of elderly people. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 17, 200–213.
11.
ClossS. J., StewartL. S. P., BrandE., & CurrieC. T. (1995). A scheme of early supported discharge for elderly trauma patients: The views of patients, carers and community staff. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 373–376.
12.
CohenE. S. (1988). The elderly mystique: Constraints on the autonomy of the elderly with disabilities. The Gerontologist, 28 (Supplement), 24–31.
13.
CollopyB. (1988). Autonomy in long term care: Some crucial distinctions. The Gerontologist, 28 (Supplement), 10–17.
14.
CollopyB (1993). The burden of beneficence. In KaneR. A. & CaplanA. (Eds.), Ethical conflicts in the management of home care: The case manager's dilemma (pp. 93–100). New York: Springer.
15.
CongdonJ. (1994). Managing the incongruities: The hospital discharge experience for elderly patients, their families and nurses. Applied Nursing Research, 7, 125–131. doi:10.1016/0897–1897(94)90004–3
16.
CoultonC., DunkleR., GoodeR. A., & MacKintoshJ. (1982). Discharge planning as a decision-making process. Health and Social Work, 7, 253–261.
17.
DavisL. E. (1991). Aiding the Alzheimer's dementia patient to live in safety and security. Caring, 10, 36–42.
18.
DietscheS. (1993). View from the field: Perspective from Oregon. In KaneR. A. & CaplanA. (Eds.). Ethical conflicts in the management of home care: The case manager's dilemma (pp. 143–145). New York: Springer.
19.
DresserR. (1993). Influences on ethical reasoning. In KaneR. A. & CaplanA. (Eds.), Ethical conflicts in the management of home care: The case manager's dilemma (pp. 121–127). New York: Springer.
20.
DublerN. L. (1988). Improving the discharge planning process: Distinguishing between coercion and choice. The Gerontologist, 28 (Supplement), 76–81.
21.
EllingsonS., & FullerJ. D. (1998). A good death? Finding a balance between the interests of patients and caregivers. Generations 22(3), 87–91.
22.
ElonR. (1993). Death and the case manager. In KaneR. A. & CaplanA. (Eds.), Ethical conflicts in the management of home care: The case manager's dilemma. (pp. 137–142). New York: Springer.
23.
FalardeauM., & DurandM. J. (2002). Negotiation-centred versus client-centred: Which approach should be used?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 135–142.
24.
FeldmanR. B., & KocinM. Z. (1991). Caring for disorientated clients with Alzheimer's disease at home. Journal of Home Health Care Practice, 3 (4), 40–47.
25.
FrankumJ. L., BrayJ., EllM. S., & PhilpI. (1995). Predicting post-discharge outcomes. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 370–372.
26.
GageM., & PolatajkoH. (1995). Naming practice: The case for the term client-driven. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 115–118.
27.
EvansJ. Grimley (1984). Prevention of age-associated loss of autonomy: Epidemiological approaches. Journal of Chronic Disease, 37, 353–363.
28.
Health Canada. (1997). Risk, vulnerability, resiliency – Health system implications. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada Publications.
29.
HennessyC. (1989). Autonomy and risk: The role of client wishes in community-based long-term care. The Gerontologist, 29, 633–639.
30.
HobsonS. J. (1996). Being client-centred when the client is cognitively impaired. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 133–137.
31.
HobsonS. J. (1999a). Using a client-centred approach with elderly people. In SumsionT. (Ed.), Client-centred practice in occupational therapy. (pp. 61–72). Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone.
32.
HobsonS. J. (1999b). Using a client-centred approach with persons with cognitive impairment. In SumsionT. (Ed.), Client-centred practice in occupational therapy. (pp. 51–60). Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone.
33.
HoflandB. (1988). Autonomy in long term care: Background issues and a programmatic response. The Gerontologist, 28 (Supplement), 3–9.
34.
KaneR. A. (1988). Case management: Ethical pitfalls on the road to high-quality managed care. Quality Review Bulletin, 14, 161–166.
35.
KaneR. A. (1999). Goals of home care: Therapeutic, compensatory, either or both?Journal of Aging and Health, 11, 299–321.
36.
KaneR. A., CaplanA. L., & ThomasC. K. (1993). Conclusion: Toward an ethic of case management. In KaneR. A. & CaplanA. (Eds.). Ethical conflicts in the management of home care: The case manager's dilemma. (pp. 249–262). New York: Springer.
37.
KaneR. A., & LevinC. A. (1998). Who's safe? Who's sorry? The duty to protect the safety of clients in home and community-based care. Generations, 22 (3), 76–81.
38.
KaneR. L., & KaneR. A. (1985). A will and a way: What the United States can learn from Canada about caring for the elderly. New York: Columbia University Press.
39.
KappM. B. (1997). Who is responsible for this? Assessing rights and consequences in elder care. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 9 (2), 51–65.
40.
KappM. B., & WilsonK. B. (1995). Assisted living and negotiated risk: Reconciling protection and autonomy. Journal of Ethics, Law and Aging, 1, 5–13.
41.
KaufmanS. R. (1994). The social construction of frailty: An anthropological perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 8, 45–58. doi:10.1016/0890–4065(94)90018–3
42.
KielhofnerG. (1995). A model of human occupation: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
43.
KneeboneI., & HarropA. (1996). Patient confidence in return home: Development of a measurement instrument. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 43, 19–23.
44.
LawM., CooperB., StrongS., StewartD., RigbyP., & LettsL. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9–23.
LewisH. (1984). Self-determination: The aged client's autonomy in service encounters. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 7 (3), 51–63.
47.
MaloneyC. C., & KasperP. K. (1991). Discharge planning for the geriatric patient. In KiernatJ. M. (Ed.), Occupational therapy and the older adult: A clinical manual (pp. 137–154). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
48.
MannW. C., HurrenD., TomitaB., BengaliM., & SteinfieldE. (1994). Environmental problems in homes of elders with disability. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14, 191–211.
49.
McCollM. A., PatersonM., DaviesD., DoubtL., & LawM. (2000). Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 22–30.
50.
MolloyD. W., DarzinsP., & StrangD. (1999). Capacity to decide. Troy, ON: New Grange Press.
51.
NaylorM. (2000). A decade of transitional care research with vulnerable elders. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 14 (3), 1–14.
52.
PollockN., & McCollM.A. (1998). Assessment in client-centred occupational therapy. In LawM. (Ed.), Client-centered occupational therapy (pp. 89–105). Thorofare NJ: Slack.
53.
PostS. G. (1993). Tensions between person and community. In KaneR. A. & CaplanA. (Eds.), Ethical conflicts in the management of home care: The case manager's dilemma (pp. 101–107). New York: Springer.
54.
PriesterR. (1993). View from the law. In KaneR. A. & CaplanA. (Eds.), Ethical conflicts in the management of home care: The case manager's dilemma. (pp. 215–222). New York: Springer.
RubinsteinR. L., KilbrideJ. C., & NagyS. (1992). Elders living alone: Frailty and the perception of choice. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
57.
RydenM. (1993). Clinical determination of competency and existential advocacy. In KaneR. A. & CaplanA. (Eds.), Ethical conflicts in the management of home care: The case manager's dilemma (pp. 68–75). New York: Springer.
58.
Shöne-SeifertB. (1995). Risk. In ReichW.T. (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Bioethics (Vol. 4, pp. 2316–2321). New York: Macmillan.
59.
SumsionT. (1999). Implementation issues. In SumsionT. (Ed.), Client-centred practice in occupational therapy (pp. 27–37). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
60.
TannousC., Lehmann-MonckV., MagoffinR., JacksonO., & LlewellynG. (1999). Beyond good practice: Issues in working with people with intellectual disability and high support needs. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 46, 24–35. doi:10.1046/j.1440–1630.1999.00173.x
61.
TauerC. A. (1993). Risks and choices: When is paternalism justified? In KaneR. A. & CaplanA. (Eds.), Ethical conflicts in the management of home care: The case manager's dilemma (pp. 45–52). New York: Springer.
62.
ThomK. M., & BlairS.E. (1998). Risk in dementia—Assessment and management: A literature review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 441–447.
63.
WellsD. (1997). A critical ethnography of the process of discharge decision making for elderly patients. Canadian Journal on Aging, 16, 682–699.
64.
Wynne-HarleyD. (1991). Living dangerously: Risk taking and older people. London: Centre for Policy on Aging.
