Background. There is a growing emphasis in academic, policy and popular literature within Western societies on positive discourses of aging. Although such discourses appear to be consistent with central beliefs of occupational therapy, particularly with respect to the health-promoting potential of occupation, critical social gerontologists are raising concerns about how such discourses are being shaped in relation to consumer culture and the rise of neoliberalism. Method and Purpose. Literature examining the emergence and evolution of positive aging discourses was reviewed and reflected upon using an occupational perspective. Results. Positive aging discourses are being shaped in ways that limit occupational possibilities and promote occupational injustices. Clinical Implications. Occupational therapists need to consider ways to enact discursive, practice and policy changes that enable aging persons with diverse abilities and resources to pursue occupations that fulfill needs and promote health.
AndrewsM. (1999). The seductiveness of agelessness. Ageing and Society, 19, 301–318.
2.
BiggsS. (2001). Toward critical narrativity: Stories of aging in contemporary social policy. Journal of Aging Studies, 15, 303–316.
3.
BlaikieA. (1999). Ageing and popular culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BortzW. M. (1989). Redefining human aging. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 37, 1092–1096.
5.
CarlsonM.ClarkF.YoungB. (1998). Practical contributions of occupational science to the art of successful ageing: How to sculpt a meaningful life in older adulthood. Journal of Occupational Science, 5, 107–118.
6.
ColeT.ThompsonB. (2001/2002). Anti-aging: Are you for it or against it?Generations, 25, 6–8.
7.
DalbyP. (1999, September 25). Those feet were made for walking. The Toronto Star, p. SS2.
8.
DanneferD. (2000). Bringing risk back in: The regulation of the self in the postmodern state. In WarnerSchaie K.HendricksJ. (Eds.), The evolution of the aging self: The societal impact of the aging process (pp. 269–280). New York: Springer.
9.
DaveyJ. A. (2002). Active ageing and education in mid and later life. Ageing and Society, 22, 95–113.
10.
DeanM. (1995). Governing the unemployed self in an active society. Economy and Society, 24, 559–583.
11.
FeatherstoneM.HepworthM. (1995). Images of positive aging: A case study of ‘Retirement Choice’ magazine. In FeatherstoneM.WernickA. (Eds.), Images of aging: Cultural representations of later life (pp. 29–48). London: Routledge.
12.
GilleardC.HiggsP. (2000). Cultures of aging: Self, citizens and the body. New York: Prentice Hall.
13.
HackingI. (1986). Making up people. In HellerT.C. (Ed.), Reconstructing individualism (pp. 222–236). Stantford: Stantford University Press.
14.
HolsteinM. (1999). Women and productive aging: Troubling implications. In MinklerM.EstesC. L. (Eds.), Critical gerontology: Perspectives from political and moral economy (pp. 359–373). New York: Baywood.
15.
HolsteinM.MinklerM. (2003). Self, society and the ‘New Gerontology’. The Gerontologist, 43, 787–797.
16.
HugmanR. (1999). Ageing, occupation and social engagement: Towards a lively later life. Journal of Occupational Science, 6, 61–67.
17.
KatzS. (2000). Busy bodies: Activity, aging and the management of everyday life. Journal of Aging Studies, 14, 135–152.
18.
KatzS. (2001/2002). Growing old without aging? Positive aging, anti-ageism and anti-aging. Generations, 25, 27–32.
19.
KatzS.LaliberteRudman D. (2004). Exemplars of retirement: Identity and agency between life style and social movement. In TulleE. (Ed.), Old age and agency (pp. 45–65). New York: Nova Science.
20.
KempC.L.DentonM. (2003). The allocation of responsibility for later life. Ageing and Society, 23, 737–760.
21.
LaliberteRudman D. (in press). Shaping the active, autonomous and responsible modern retiree: An analysis of discursive technologies and their links with neo-liberal political rationality. Ageing and Society.
22.
LaliberteRudman D. (2005). Understanding political influences on occupational possibilities: An analysis of newspaper constructions of retirement. Journal of Occupational Science, 12, 149–160.
23.
LawsG. (1996). ‘A shot of economic adrenalin’: Reconstructing ‘the elderly’ in the retiree-based economic development literature. Journal of Aging Studies, 10, 171–188.
24.
LuptonD. (1995). The imperative of health. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
25.
McHughK. E. (2000). The ‘ageless self’? Emplacement of identities in Sun Belt Retirement Communities. Journal of Aging Studies, 14, 103–115.
26.
RoseN. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
27.
RoweJ. W.KahnR. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37, 433–440.
28.
TownsendE. (1997). Occupation: Potential for personal and social transformation. Journal of Occupational Science, 4, 18–26.
29.
TownsendE.WilcockA. (2004). Occupational justice. In ChristiansenC.H.TownsendE.A., Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (pp. 243–273). New York: Prentice Hall.
30.
TownsonM. (2001). Pensions under attack. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and James Lorimer and Company.
31.
Tulle-WintonE. (1999). Growing old and resistance: Towards a new cultural economy of old age?Ageing and Society, 19, 281–289.
32.
WaltersW. (1997). The ‘active society’: New designs for social policy. Policy and Politics, 25, 221–234.
33.
WhitefordG. (2001). The occupational agenda of the future. Journal of Occupational Science, 8, 13–16.
34.
WhitefordG. (2004). When people cannot participate: Occupational deprivation. In ChristiansenC.H.TownsendE.A. (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (pp. 221–242). New York: Prentice Hall.
