Getting consumers to adopt infection prevention measures is important for society to overcome the coronavirus pandemic. This research adopts a moral decoupling perspective to examine how consumers in Germany respond to perceived transgressions of COVID-19 infection prevention regulations. Focusing on two nonpharmaceutical measures (mask wearing, social distancing) as well as a pharmaceutical one (vaccination), two empirical studies indicate that transgression relevance influences intention to adopt the measure (in parallel) through judgment of performance and judgment of morality. Type of transgression moderates the effect of transgression relevance on morality, but not on performance. In addition, effects weaken as a person’s fear of infection increases. Effects are robust, though, when controlling for moral decoupling and moral delegation (Study 1), and additionally for psychological reactance and political orientation (Study 2). Implications for research and practice evolve around new insights into how to get consumers to adopt infection prevention measures more effectively.
AdamsM.EffertzT. (2010). Effective prevention against risky underage drinking—The need for higher excise taxes on alcoholic beverages in Germany. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 45(4), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agq031
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorelliC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
4.
BapujiH.de BakkerF. G. A.BrownJ. A.HigginsC.RehbeinK.SpicerA. (2020). Business and society research in times of the corona crisis. Business and Society, 59(6), 1067–1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320921172
5.
BarbieriP. N.BoniniB. (2021). Political orientation and adherence to social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Economia Politica, 38(42), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-021-00224-w
6.
BartlingB.FischbacherU. (2012). Shifting the blame: On delegation and responsibility. Review of Economic Studies, 79(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdr023
7.
BhattacharjeeA.BermanJ. Z.ReedA. (2013). Tip of the hat, wag of the finger: How moral decoupling enables consumers to admire and admonish. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1167–1184. https://doi.org/10.1086/667786
8.
BishA.MichieS. (2010). Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(4), 797–824. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X485826
9.
BrehmJ. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.
10.
BrüggenjürgenB.StrickerH. P.KristL.OrtizM.ReinholdT.RollS.RotterG.WeikertB.Wiese-PosseltM.WillichS. N. (2021). Impact of public health interventions to curb SARS-CoV-2 spread assessed by an evidence-educated Delphi panel and tailored SEIR model. Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01566-2
CampbellM. C.WinterichK. P. (2018). A framework for the consumer psychology of morality in the marketplace. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1038
15.
CarfìA.BernabeiR.LandiF. (2020). Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. Journal of the American Medical Association, 324(6), 603–605. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12603
ChanE. Y. (2021). Moral foundations underlying behavioral compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110463
18.
ChangD. R.JangJ.LeeE. Y.LeeH.ChangB. (2017). When a good company transgresses: A study of the influences of CSR, moral decoupling, and ethnocentrism. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 8(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2016.1255853
19.
ChenJ.TengL.LiaoY. (2018). Counterfeit luxuries: Does moral reasoning strategy influence consumers’ pursuit of counterfeits?Journal of Business Ethics, 151(1), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3255-y
20.
ClarkC.DavilaA.RegisM.KrausS. (2020). Predictors of COVID-19 voluntary compliance behaviors: An international investigation. Global Transitions, 2, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.06.003
21.
CloreG. L.GasperK.GarvinE. (2001). Affect as information. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121–144). Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
CohnE. G.LarsonE. L.AraujoC.SawyerV.WilliamsO. (2012). Calorie postings in chain restaurants in a low-income urban neighborhood: Measuring practical utility and policy compliance. Journal of Urban Health, 89(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9671-0
23.
CowanK.YazdanparastA. (2019). Consequences of moral transgressions: How regulatory focus orientation motivates or hinders moral decoupling. Journal of Business Ethics, 170, 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04268-8
24.
DíazR.CovaF. (2021). Reactance, morality, and disgust: The relationship between affective dispositions and compliance with official health recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cognition and Emotion, 36, 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.1941783
DillardJ. P.ShenL. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
27.
DonovanL. M. (2018). Consumer response to transgression relevance and proactive disclosure. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 9(7), 13–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v9n7p2
28.
EarleT. C.SiegristM. (2006). Morality information, performance information, and the distinction between trust and confidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), 383–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00012.x
29.
ElmD. R.KennedyE. J.LawtonL. (2001). Determinants of moral reasoning: Sex role orientation, gender, and academic factors. Business & Society, 40(3), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030104000302
30.
FehrR.WelshD.YamK. C.BaerM.WeiW.VaulontM. (2019). The role of moral decoupling in the causes and consequences of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 153, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.05.007
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
33.
HaberstrohK.OrthU. R.HoffmannS.BrunkB. (2017). Consumer response to unethical corporate behavior: A re-examination and extension of the moral decoupling model. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(1), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2661-x
34.
HamiltonK.SmithS. R.KeechJ. J.MoyersS. A.HaggerM. S. (2020). Application of the health action process approach to social distancing behavior during COVID-19. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 12(4), 1244–1269. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12231
35.
HammanJ. R.LoewensteinG.WeberR. A. (2010). Self-interest through delegation: An additional rationale for the principal-agent relationship. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1826–1846. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.4.1826
36.
HarperC. A.SatchellL. P.FidoD.LatzmanR. D. (2020). Functional fear predicts public health compliance in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5
37.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
38.
HumphreyL.ThommesE. W.FieldsR.CoudevilleL.HakimN.ChitA.CojocaruM. G. (2020). Testing, tracing and social distancing: Assessing options for the control of COVID_19. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.20077503
39.
HuynhH. P.SengerA. R. (2021). A little shot of humility: Intellectual humility predicts vaccination attitudes and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(4), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12747
40.
IngramR.SkinnerS. J.TaylorV. A. (2005). Consumers’ evaluation of unethical marketing behaviors: The role of customer commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1899-0
41.
JeantyJ. (2008). Social cognitive theory of moral thought & action. In KurtinesW. M.GewirtzJ.LambJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1, pp. 69–128). Psychology Press.
42.
JonesT. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958
43.
JostJ. T.van der LindenS.PanagopoulosC.HardinC. D. (2018). Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.003
44.
KavakB.GürelE.EryiğitC.TektaşÖ. Ö. (2009). Examining the effects of moral development level, self-concept, and self-monitoring on consumers’ ethical attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0114-0
45.
KenyonC. (2020). Flattening-the-curve associated with reduced COVID-19 case fatality rates- an ecological analysis of 65 countries. Journal of Infection, 81(1), 98–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.007
46.
KrohM. (2007). Measuring left-right political orientation: The choice of response format. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm009
47.
LazurasL.EiserJ. R.RodafinosA. (2009). Predicting smokers’ non-compliance with smoking restrictions in public places. Tobacco Control, 18(2), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2008.025841
48.
LeeJ. S.KwakD. H. (2016). Consumers’ responses to public figures’ transgression: Moral reasoning strategies and implications for endorsed brands. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2544-1
49.
LeisingD.GallreinA. M. B.DufnerM. (2014). Judging the behavior of people we know: Objective assessment, confirmation of preexisting views, or both?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213507287
50.
LinC.-Y. (2020). Social reaction toward the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Social Health and Behavior, 3(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.4103/shb.shb_11_20
51.
MayD. R.PauliK. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in ethical decision making: A review and investigation of moral recognition, evaluation, and intention. Business & Society, 41(1), 84–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302041001006
52.
MertensG.GerritsenL.DuijndamS.SaleminkE.EngelhardI. M. (2020). Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): Predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74, 102258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102258
MulderL. B.van DijkE. (2020). Moral rationalization contributes more strongly to escalation of unethical behavior among low moral identifiers than among high moral identifiers. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2912. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02912
55.
MurphyK.WilliamsonH.SargeantE.McCarthyM. (2020). Why people comply with COVID-19 social distancing restrictions: Self-interest or duty?Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 53, 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865820954484
56.
MusschengaA. W. (2008). Moral judgement and moral reasoning. In MusschengaA. W. (Ed.), The contingent nature of life (pp. 131–146). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6764-8_12
57.
NielsenL.McGregorS. L. T. (2013). Consumer morality and moral norms. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(5), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12032
58.
NybergD. (2008). The morality of everyday activities: Not the right, but the good thing to do. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9530-1
OksanenA.KaakinenM.LatikkaR.SavolainenI.SavelaN.KoivulaA. (2020). Regulation and trust: 3-month follow-up study on COVID-19 mortality in 25 European countries. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), Article e19218. https://doi.org/10.2196/19218
61.
OrthU. R.HoffmannS.NickelK. (2019). Moral decoupling feels good and makes buying counterfeits easy. Journal of Business Research, 98, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.001
62.
OzdemirS.NgS.ChaudhryI.FinkelsteinE. A. (2020). Adoption of preventive behaviour strategies and public perceptions about COVID-19 in Singapore. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11, 579–591. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.199
63.
PaganoV.DeBonoK. G. (2011). The effects of mood on moral judgment: The role of self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(12), 2928–2942. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00864.x
64.
PakpourA. H.GriffithsM. D.ChangK. C.ChenY. P.KuoY. J.LinC. Y. (2020). Assessing the fear of COVID-19 among different populations: A response to Ransing et al. (2020). Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 89, 524–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.06.006
65.
PantanoE.PizziG.ScarpiD.DennisC. (2020). Competing during a pandemic? Retailers’ ups and downs during the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Business Research, 116, 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.036
PlümperT.NeumayerE.PfaffK. G. (2021). The strategy of protest against Covid-19 containment policies in Germany. Social Science Quarterly, 102(5), 2236–2250. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13066
68.
PutrevuS.LordK. I. (1994). Comparative and noncomparative advertising: Attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions. Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1994.10673443
69.
RaghunathanR.PhamM. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(1), 56–77. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2838
70.
ReynoldsS. J.CeranicT. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610–1624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1610
RoggeveenA. L.SethuramanR. (2020). How the COVID-19 pandemic may change the world of retailing. Journal of Retailing, 96(2), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.04.002
73.
SahP.VilchesT. N.MoghadasS. M.FitzpatrickM. C.SingerB. H.HotezP. J.GalvaniA. P. (2021). Accelerated vaccine rollout is imperative to mitigate highly transmissible COVID-19 variants. eClinicalMedicine, 35, Article 100865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100865
74.
SailerM.StadlerM.BotesE.FischerF.GreiffS. (2021). Science knowledge and trust in medicine affect individuals’ behavior in pandemic crises. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37, 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00529-1
75.
SchwarzerR. (1992). Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: Theoretical approaches and a new model. In SchwarzerR. (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 217–243). Hemisphere.
76.
SeresG.BalleyerA.CeruttiN.DanilovA.FriedrichsenJ.LiuY. (2020). Face masks increase compliance with physical distancing recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 7, 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-021-00108-6
77.
SezerO.GinoF.BazermanM. H. (2015). Ethical blind spots: Explaining unintentional unethical behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.030
78.
ShankaM. S.Gebremariam KotechoM. (2021). Combining rationality with morality–integrating theory of planned behavior with norm activation theory to explain compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines. Psychology, Health and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2021.1946571
79.
ShuL. L.GinoF.BazermanM. H. (2011). Dishonest deed, clear conscience: When cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211398138
80.
SittenthalerS.Traut-MattauschE.SteindlC.JonasE. (2015). Salzburger State Reactance Scale (SSR Scale): Validation of a scale measuring state reactance. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 223(4), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000227
81.
SnyderC. R. (1974). Acceptance of personality interpretations as a function of assessment procedures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036033
82.
SpinelliM. A.GliddenD. V.GennatasE. D.BieleckiM.BeyrerC.RutherfordG.ChambersH.GoosbyE.GandhiM. (2021). Importance of non-pharmaceutical interventions in lowering the viral inoculum to reduce susceptibility to infection by SARS-CoV-2 and potentially disease severity. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 21(9), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30982-8
83.
SprengholzP.BetschC.BöhmR. (2021). Reactance revisited: Consequences of mandatory and scarce vaccination in the case of COVID-19. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 13(4), 986–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12285
84.
SprengholzP.FelgendreffL.BöhmR.BetschC. (2021). Vaccination policy reactance: Predictors, consequences, and countermeasures. Journal of Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053211044535
StruttonD.PeltonL. E.FerrellO. C. (1997). Ethical behavior in retail settings: Is there a generation gap?Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017991525118
88.
TaylorS.AsmundsonG. J. G. (2021). Negative attitudes about facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic: The dual importance of perceived ineffectiveness and psychological reactance. PLOS ONE, 16(2), Article e0246317. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246317
89.
TaylorS.LandryC. A.PaluszekM. M.FergusT. A.McKayD.AsmundsonG. J. G. (2020). Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 72, 102232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102232
90.
TsangJ. A. (2002). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behavior. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.1.25
VoorheesC. M.BradyM. K.CalantoneR.RamirezE. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
93.
WeberJ. (2019). Understanding the millennials’ integrated ethical decision-making process: Assessing the relationship between personal values and cognitive moral reasoning. Business and Society, 58(8), 1671–1706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317726985
94.
WilliamsK. C. (2012). Fear appeal theory. Research in Business and Economics Journal, 5, 44–56.
95.
WitteK.AllenM. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior, 27(5), 591–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810002700506
XuP.ChengJ. (2021). Individual differences in social distancing and mask-wearing in the pandemic of COVID-19: The role of need for cognition, self-control and risk attitude. Personality and Individual Differences, 175, 110706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110706
99.
YikM.RussellJ. A.SteigerJ. H. (2011). A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion, 11(4), 705–731. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023980
100.
YıldırımM.GeçerE.AkgülÖ. (2021). The impacts of vulnerability, perceived risk, and fear on preventive behaviours against COVID-19. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 26(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1776891
101.
ZhangJ. J. Y.LeeK. S.AngL. W.LeoY. S.YoungB. E. (2020). Risk factors for severe disease and efficacy of treatment in patients infected with COVID-19: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 71(16), 2199–2206. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa576
102.
ZickfeldJ. H.SchubertT. W.HertingA. K.GraheJ.FaasseK. (2020). Correlates of health-protective behavior during the initial days of the COVID-19 outbreak in Norway. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 564083. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564083
