In emerging countries such as China where the government is gradually withdrawing from involvement in social affairs, firms face dilemmas around relational risks of partnering with different forms of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Affiliated NGOs (those with close relationships with government) are more likely to sabotage the social partnership through misconduct, and are also capable of higher standards of collaborative social performance compared with independent NGOs (those with few such relationships). This study proposes that firms’ political embeddedness helps mitigate relational risks in cross-sector partner selection, and finds that politically connected firms are more likely to partner with affiliated NGOs than with independent NGOs in China. This effect is more pronounced for private firms that are less socially oriented or are located in regions with less-developed formal institutions and social trust. Our findings highlight relational risks relevant to cross-sector partner selection literature and offer important insights into how relational risks can be reduced in cross-sector partner selection in emerging countries.
AhlstromD.BrutonG. D.YehK. S. (2008). Private firms in China: Building legitimacy in an emerging economy. Journal of World Business, 43, 385–399.
2.
AhmadsimabA.ChowdhuryI. (2021). Managing tensions and divergent institutional logics in firm–NPO partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04265-x.
3.
AlonsoJ. M.AndrewsR. (2019). Governance by targets and the performance of cross-sector partnerships: Do partner diversity and partnership capabilities matter?Strategic Management Journal, 40, 556–579.
4.
AngJ. S.ChengY.WuC. (2015). Trust, investment, and business contracting. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50, 569–595.
5.
ArenasD.SanchezP.MurphyM. (2013). Different paths to collaboration between businesses and civil society and the role of third parties. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 723–739.
6.
AustinJ. E. (2004). Social partnering in Latin America: Lessons drawn from collaborations of businesses and civil society organizations. Harvard University David Rockefeller.
7.
BabiakK.ThibaultL. (2009). Challenges in multiple cross-sector partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 117–143.
8.
Barroso-MéndezM. J.Galera-CasquetC.SeitanidiM. M.Valero-AmaroV. (2016). Cross-sector social partnership success: A process perspective on the role of relational factors. European Management Journal, 34, 674–685.
9.
BaurD.SchmitzH. P. (2012). Corporations and NGOs: When accountability leads to co-optation. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 9–21.
10.
BrassD. J.GalaskiewiczJ.GreveH. R.TsaiW. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 795–817.
11.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.StoneM. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44–55.
12.
BurtR. S.KnezM. (1995). Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality and Society, 7, 255–292.
13.
ChenW. (2007). Does the color of the cat matter? The red hat strategy in China’s private enterprises. Management and Organization Review, 3, 55–80.
14.
ChengC. Y.TangM. J. (2019). Partner-selection effects on venture capital investment performance with uncertainties. Journal of Business Research, 95, 242–252.
15.
ClarkeA.FullerM. (2010). Collaborative strategic management: Strategy formulation and implementation by multi-organizational cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 85–101.
16.
CrottyJ.HallS. M. (2013). Environmental responsibility in a transition context: Russian NGO perception and response. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 667–681.
17.
DasT.TengB.-S. (1999). Managing risks in strategic alliances. The Academy of Management Executive, 13(4), 50–62.
18.
De ClercqD. D.SapienzaH. J.ZaheerA. (2008). Firm and group influences on venture capital firms’ involvement in new ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 1169–1194.
19.
DentoniD.BitzerV.PascucciS. (2016). Cross-sector partnerships and the co-creation of dynamic capabilities for stakeholder orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 35–53.
20.
DinesenP. T.SønderskovK. M. (2015). Ethnic diversity and social trust: Evidence from the micro-context. American Sociological Review, 80, 550–573.
21.
DingR.DekkerH.GrootT. (2013). Risk, partner selection and contractual control in interfirm relationships. Management Accounting Research, 24, 140–155.
22.
DuX.JianW.ZengQ.DuY. (2014). Corporate environmental responsibility in polluting industries: Does religion matter?Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 485–507.
23.
EwejeG.PalakshappaN. (2009). Business partnerships with nonprofits: Working to solve mutual problems in New Zealand. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(6), 337–351.
24.
FanJ. P. H.HuangJ.Oberholzer-GeeF.ZhaoM. (2020). Bureaucrats as managers and their roles in corporate diversification. Journal of Corporate Finance, 63, 101171.
25.
FeilhauerS.HahnR. (2021). Formalization of firms’ evaluation processes in cross-sector partnerships for sustainability. Business & Society, 60, 684–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319856633.
26.
FröhlichC. (2012). Civil society and the state intertwined: The case of disability NGOs in Russia. East European Politics, 28, 371–389.
27.
GeorgeG.CorbishleyC.KhayesiJ. N. O.HaasM. R.TihanyiL. (2016). Bringing Africa in: Promising directions for management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 377–393.
28.
Ghaus-PashaA.IqbalM. A. (2003). Defining the nonprofit sector: Pakistan (Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, No. 42). The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
29.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
30.
HanH. (2018). Legal governance of NGOs in China under Xi Jinping: Reinforcing divide and rule. Asian Journal of Political Science, 26, 390–409.
31.
HasmathR.HildebrandtT.HsuJ. Y. J. (2019). Conceptualizing government-organized non-governmental organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 15(3), 267-284.
32.
HasmathR.HsuJ. (2008). NGOs in China: Issues of good governance and accountability. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 30, 29–39.
33.
HasmathR.HsuJ. Y. J. (2014). Isomorphic pressures, epistemic communities and state–NGO collaboration in China. The China Quarterly, 220, 936–954.
34.
HavemanH. A.JiaN.ShiJ.WangY. (2017). The dynamics of political embeddedness in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62, 67–104.
35.
HendersonS. L. (2002). Selling civil society: Western aid and the nongovernmental organization sector in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 35, 139–167.
36.
HittM. A.BeamishP. W.JacksonS. E.MathieuJ. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1385–1399.
37.
HofmannD. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723–744.
38.
HsuJ. Y. J.HasmathR. (2014). The local corporatist state and NGO relations in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 23(87), 516–534.
39.
HuangL.LuoY.LiuY.YangQ. (2016). An investigation of interpersonal ties in interorganizational exchanges in emerging markets: A boundary-spanning perspective. Journal of Management, 42, 1557–1587.
40.
InoueC. (2019). Election cycles and organizations: How politics shapes the performance of state-owned enterprises over time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(3), 677–709.
41.
IrelandR. D.HittM. A.VaidyanathD. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 28, 413–446.
42.
JakobsonL.SanovichS. (2010). The changing models of the Russian third sector: Import substitution phase. Journal of Civil Society, 6, 279–300.
43.
JamaliD.KaramC. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20, 32–61.
44.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
45.
JiaN.MayerK. J. (2017). Political hazards and firms’ geographic concentration. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 203–231.
46.
JohnsonJ. M.NiN. (2015). The impact of political connections on donations to Chinese NGOs. International Public Management Journal, 18, 514–535.
47.
KaldorM. (2003). The idea of global civil society. International Affairs, 79, 583–593.
48.
KangB.JindalR. P. (2015). Opportunism in buyer–seller relationships: Some unexplored antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 68, 735–742.
49.
KangN.MoonJ. (2011). Institutional complementarity between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: A comparative institutional analysis of three capitalisms. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 85–108.
50.
KayaA.VereshchaginaG. (2014). Partnerships versus corporations: Moral hazard, sorting, and ownership structure. American Economic Review, 104, 291–307.
51.
KimP. H.LiM. (2014). Seeking assurances when taking action: Legal systems, social trust, and starting businesses in emerging economies. Organization Studies, 35, 359–391.
52.
KnackS. (2001). Robert D. Putnam, bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Public Choice, 108(3), 390–395.
53.
KnackS.KeeferP. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251–1288.
54.
KojimaK.ChoeJ. Y.OhtomoT.TsujinakaY. (2012). The corporatist system and social organizations in China. Management and Organization Review, 8, 609–628.
55.
KolkA.van TulderR.KostwinderE. (2008). Business and partnerships for development. European Management Journal, 26, 262–273.
56.
KoschmannM. A.KuhnT. R.PfarrerM. D. (2012). A Communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37, 332–354.
57.
La PortaR.FlorencioL.ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1997). Trust in large organizations. American Economic Review, 87, 333–338.
58.
Le BerM. J.BranzeiO. (2010). (Re) forming strategic cross-sector partnerships: Relational processes of social innovation. Business & Society, 49, 140–172.
59.
LiH.MengL.ZhangJ. (2006). Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China. Economic Inquiry, 44, 559–578.
60.
LiY.PicklesA.SavageM. (2005). Social capital and social trust in Britain. European Sociological Review, 21, 109–123.
61.
LinH.DarnallN. (2015). Strategic alliance formation and structural configuration. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 549–564.
62.
LjubownikowS.CrottyJ. (2014). Civil society in a transitional context: The response of health and educational NGOs to legislative changes in Russia’s industrialized regions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43, 759–776.
63.
LuJ. W.SongY.ShanM. (2018). Social trust in subnational regions and foreign subsidiary performance: Evidence from foreign investments in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 761–773.
64.
LuoY. (2001). Toward a cooperative view of MNC-host government relations: Building blocks and performance implications. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 401–419.
65.
LuoY. (2006). Political behavior, social responsibility, and perceived corruption: A structuration perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 747–766.
66.
MaD.ParishW. L. (2006). Tocquevillian moments: Charitable contributions by Chinese private entrepreneurs. Social Forces, 85, 943–964.
67.
MaX.TongT. W.FitzaM. (2013). How much does subnational region matter to foreign subsidiary performance? Evidence from Fortune Global 500 Corporations’ investment in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 44, 66–87.
68.
MarquisC.RaynardM. (2015). Institutional strategies in emerging markets. The Academy of Management Annals, 9, 291–335.
69.
McEvilyB.PerroneV.ZaheerA. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14, 91–103.
70.
Ministry of Civil Affairs. (2013). Minzheng Tongji Nianjian [Civil statistics annual report]. China Statistics Press.
71.
MurphyM.ArenasD.BatistaJ. M. (2015). Value creation in cross-sector collaborations: The roles of experience and alignment. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 145–162.
72.
MurphyM.PerrotF.Rivera-SantosM. (2012). New perspectives on learning and innovation in cross-sector collaborations. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1700–1709.
73.
NeeV.IngramP. (1998). Embeddedness and beyond: Institutions, exchange and social structure. In BrintonM.NeeV. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in sociology (pp. 19–45). Russell SAGE Foundation.
74.
NeeV.OpperS. (2010). Political capital in a market economy. Social Forces, 88, 2105–2132.
75.
OkhmatovskiyI. (2010). Performance implications of ties to the government and SOEs: A political embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1020–1047.
76.
OxleyJ. E. (1999). Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: The impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38, 283–309.
77.
PengM. W.ZhouJ. Q. (2005). How network strategies and institutional transitions evolve in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22, 321–336.
78.
PetersonM. F.ArregleJ. L.MartinX. (2012). Multilevel models in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 451–457.
79.
ReastJ.LindgreenA.VanhammeJ.MaonF. (2010). The Manchester Super Casino: Experience and learning in a cross-sector social partnership. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 197–218.
80.
ReuerJ. J.DevarakondaR. (2017). Partner selection in R&D collaborations: Effects of affiliations with venture capitalists. Organization Science, 28, 574–595.
Rivera-SantosM.RufínC. (2010). Odd couples: Understanding the governance of firm–NGO alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 55–70.
83.
Rivera-SantosM.RufínC.WassmerU. (2017). Alliances between firms and non-profits: A multiple and behavioural agency approach. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 854–875.
84.
RondinelliD. A.LondonT. (2003). How corporations and environmental groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17, 61–76.
85.
SchneiderM.ScholzJ.LubellM.MindrutaD.EdwardsenM. (2003). Building consensual institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 143–158.
86.
SeitanidiM. M.CraneA. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 413–429.
87.
SeitanidiM. M.KoufopoulosD. N.PalmerP. (2010). Partnership formation for change: Indicators for transformative potential in cross sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 139–161.
88.
SeitanidiM. M.LindgreenA. (2010). Editorial: Cross-sector social interactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 1–7.
89.
SelskyJ. W.ParkerB. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31, 849–873.
90.
SelskyJ. W.ParkerB. (2010). Platforms for cross-sector social partnerships: Prospective sensemaking devices for social benefit. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 21–37.
91.
SharmaA. (2006). Crossbreeding institutions, breeding struggle: Women’s empowerment, neoliberal governmentality, and state (re)formation in India. Cultural Anthropology, 21, 60–95.
92.
SiegelJ. (2007). Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 621–666.
93.
SpiresA. J. (2011). Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: Understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1–45.
94.
StarkD.VedresB. (2012). Political holes in the economy. American Sociological Review, 77, 700–722.
95.
StephenW. K.VickieE. (2017). Examining the ethics of Government-Organized Nongovernmental Organizations (GONGOs). Public Integrity, 19, 529–546.
96.
SunP.HuH. W.HillmanA. J. (2016). The dark side of board political capital: Enabling blockholder rent appropriation. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1801–1822.
97.
SunP.MellahiK.ThunE. (2010). The dynamic value of MNE political embeddedness: The case of the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1161–1182.
98.
ToeplerS.SalamonL. M. (2003). NGO development in Central and Eastern Europe: An empirical overview. East European Quarterly, 37, 365.
99.
TortajadaC. (2016). Nongovernmental organizations and influence on global public policy. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 3, 266–274.
WalkerC. (2016). Dealing with authoritarian resurgence. In DiamondL.PlattnerM. F.WalkerC. (Eds.), Authoritarianism goes global: The challenge to democracy (pp. 213–234). John Hopkins University Press.
102.
WangX.FanG.YuJ. (2017). Marketization index of China’s provinces: NERI report 2016. Social Science Academic.
103.
WuF. (2002). New partners or old brothers? GONGOs in transnational environmental advocacy in China. China Environment Series, 5, 45–58.
104.
WuW.WuC.ZhouC.WuJ. (2012). Political connections, tax benefits and firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31, 277–300.
105.
YiuD. W.WanW. P.NgF. W.ChenX.SuJ. (2014). Sentimental drivers of social entrepreneurship: A study of China’s Guangcai (Glorious) Program. Management and Organization Review, 10, 55–80.
106.
YuT.SengulM.LesterR. H. (2008). Misery loves company: The spread of negative impacts resulting from an organizational crisis. Academy of Management Review, 33, 452–472.
107.
ZhanX.TangS. Y. (2013). Political opportunities, resource constraints and policy advocacy of environmental NGOs in China. Public Administration, 91, 381–399.
108.
ZhanX.TangS. Y. (2016). Understanding the implications of government ties for nonprofit operations and functions. Public Administration Review, 76, 589–600.
109.
ZhaoJ. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in contemporary China. Edward Elgar Publishing.
110.
ZhengW.NiN.CrillyD. (2019). Non-profit organizations as a nexus between government and business: Evidence from Chinese charities. Strategic Management Journal, 40, 658–684.
111.
ZhouK. Z.PoppoL.YangZ. (2008). Relational ties or customized contracts? An examination of alternative governance choices in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 526–534.
112.
ZhuH.ChungC. N. (2014). Portfolios of political ties and business group strategy in emerging economies: Evidence from Taiwan. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 599–638.
113.
ZuckerL. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
