Theoretical evidence suggests that corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) should produce long-lasting negative influences on firm performance. Yet, little empirical evidence exists in the literature to support this time-embedded research frame. This research was conducted by collecting a large set of firm data and by employing a series of vector autoregressive models to map out the longitudinal dynamic relationships between CSI and firm value under high versus low levels of two external factors, environmental dynamism and competition intensity, and one internal factor, firm capability. The results show that CSI’s negative influences endure in scenarios such as high dynamism, high competition intensity, and low capability, but it has only a short-term impact on low-dynamism markets and does not produce significant effects on firm value under low-competition or high-capability conditions. These findings yield useful implications for CSI, resource-based theory, and environment theories as well as for managerial effectiveness of coping with social negativities.
AllsopD. T.BassettB. R.HoskinsJ. A. (2007). Word-of-mouth research: Principles and applications. Journal of Advertising Research, 47, 398–411.
2.
AmineA. (1998). Consumers’ true brand loyalty: The central role of commitment. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6, 305–319.
3.
AngS. H. (2008). Competitive intensity and collaboration: Impact on firm growth across technological environments. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1057–1075.
4.
ArielyD. (2000). Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers’ decision making and preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 233–248.
5.
ArmstrongJ. S. (1977). Social irresponsibility in management. Journal of Business Research, 5, 185–213.
6.
AroraM. P.LodhiaS. (2017). The BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill: Exploring the link between social and environmental disclosures and reputation risk management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1287–1297.
7.
AuhS.MengucB. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1652–1661.
8.
Austen-SmithD.DiermeierD.ZemelE.DiermeierD.MerkleyG. (2017). Unintended acceleration: Toyota’s recall crisis (Cases 1–16). Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.
9.
BahadirS. C.BharadwajS. G.SrivastavaR. K. (2008). Financial value of brands in mergers and acquisitions: Is value in the eye of the beholder?Journal of Marketing, 72(6), 49–64.
10.
BarnettM. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 794–816.
11.
BarnettM. L. (2014). Why stakeholders ignore firm misconduct: A cognitive view. Journal of Management, 40, 676–702.
12.
BarneyJ. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27, 643–650.
13.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.
14.
BhattacharyaC. B.KorschunD.SenS. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 257–272.
15.
BoisotM.ChildJ. (1999). Organizations as adaptive systems in complex environments: The case of China. Organization Science, 10, 237–252.
16.
BrammerS.PavelinS. (2004). Building a good reputation. European Management Journal, 22, 704–713.
17.
ChenM. F.MauL. H. (2009). The impacts of ethical sales behaviour on customer loyalty in the life insurance industry. The Service Industries Journal, 29, 59–74.
18.
ChenY.GanesanS.LiuY. (2009). Does a firm’s product-recall strategy affect its financial value? An examination of strategic alternatives during product-harm crises. Journal of Marketing, 73, 214–226.
19.
ChengJ. L.KesnerI. F. (1997). Organizational slack and response to environmental shifts: The impact of resource allocation patterns. Journal of Management, 23, 1–18.
20.
ChungK. H.PruittS. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70–74.
21.
ChungT. S.LowA. (2017). The impact of investor impatience and environmental turbulence on myopic marketing management and stock performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34, 660–677.
22.
CreyerE. H.RossW. T. (1996). The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value. Marketing Letters, 7, 173–185.
23.
DainesR. (2001). Does Delaware law improve firm value?Journal of Financial Economics, 62, 525–558.
24.
DawkinsC. E. (2012). Labored relations: Corporate citizenship, labor unions, and freedom of association. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 473–500.
25.
DesaiV. M. (2014). The impact of media information on issue salience following other organizations’ failures. Journal of Management, 40, 893–918.
26.
DjelicM. L.EtchanchuH. (2017). Contextualizing corporate political responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in historical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 142, 641–661.
27.
DoukasJ. A.LangL. H. (2003). Foreign direct investment, diversification and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 153–172.
28.
DuttaS.NarasimhanO. M.RajivS. (1999). Success in high-technology markets: Is marketing capability critical?Marketing Science, 18, 547–568.
29.
DuttaS.NarasimhanO. M.RajivS. (2005). Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 277–285.
30.
EisenhardtK. M.MartinJ. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.
31.
El GhoulS.GuedhamiO.KwokC. C.MishraD. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 2388–2406.
32.
FangE.PalmatierR. W.SteenkampJ. B. E. (2008). Effect of service transition strategies on firm value. Journal of Marketing, 72(5), 1–14.
33.
FlammerC. (2015). Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1469–1485.
34.
FroomanJ. (1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business & Society, 36, 221–249.
35.
GaurA. S.MaX.DingZ. (2018). Home country supportiveness/unfavorableness and outward foreign direct investment from China. Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 324–345.
36.
GlavasA.KelleyK. (2014). The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility on employee attitudes. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24, 165–202.
37.
GodfreyP. C.MerrillC. B.HansenJ. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425–445.
38.
GollI.RasheedA. A. (2004). The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 41–54.
39.
GondJ. P.IgalensJ.SwaenV.El AkremiA. (2011). The human resources contribution to responsible leadership: An exploration of the CSR-HR interface. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 115–132.
40.
GreeningD. W.TurbanD. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39, 254–280.
41.
GroenveldP. (2007). Roadmapping integrates business and technology. Research Technology Management, 50(6), 49–58.
HarringtonD. G.LawtonT. C.RajwaniT. (2005). Embracing and exploiting industry turbulence: The strategic transformation of Aer Lingus. European Management Journal, 23, 450–457.
44.
HockertsK.MoirL. (2004). Communicating corporate responsibility to investors: The changing role of the investor relations function. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 85–98.
45.
HoffmannC.FieselerC. (2012). Investor relations beyond financials: Non-financial factors and capital market image building. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17, 138–155.
46.
HoughJ. R.WhiteM. A. (2003). Environmental dynamism and strategic decision-making rationality: An examination at the decision level. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 481–489.
47.
HoughJ. R.WhiteM. A. (2004). Scanning actions and environmental dynamism: Gathering information for strategic decision making. Management Decision, 42, 781–793.
48.
HsiaoC. (2014). Analysis of panel data (No. 54). Cambridge University Press.
49.
HsuL.LawrenceB. (2016). The role of social media and brand equity during a product recall crisis: A shareholder value perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33, 59–77.
50.
HustedB. W. (2000). A contingency theory of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39, 24–48.
51.
HylandD. C.DiltzJ. D. (2002). Why firms diversify: An empirical examination. Financial Management, 31, 51–81.
52.
JamaliD.MirshakR. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 243–262.
53.
JoH.HarjotoM. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 351–383.
54.
JoshiA. W.CampbellA. J. (2003). Effect of environmental dynamism on relational governance in manufacturer-supplier relationships: A contingency framework and an empirical test. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 176–188.
55.
KaleP.DyerJ. H.SinghH. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 747–767.
56.
KangC.GermannF.GrewalR. (2016). Washing away your sins? Corporate social responsibility, corporate social irresponsibility, and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 59–79.
57.
KeatsB. W.HittM. A. (1988). A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 570–598.
58.
KellerE. (2007). Unleashing the power of word of mouth: Creating brand advocacy to drive growth. Journal of Advertising Research, 47, 448–452.
59.
KotabeM.SrinivasanS. S.AulakhP. S. (2002). Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 79–97.
60.
KrasnikovA.JayachandranS. (2008). The relative impact of marketing, research-and-development, and operations capabilities on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72, 1–11.
61.
LangeD.WashburnN. T. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37, 300–326.
62.
LiebermanM. B.DhawanR. (2005). Assessing the resource base of Japanese and U.S. auto producers: A stochastic frontier production function approach. Management Science, 51, 1060–1075.
63.
LimJ.CurrimI. S.AndrewsR. L. (2005). Consumer heterogeneity in the longer-term effects of price promotions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22, 441–457.
64.
Lin-HiN.MüllerK. (2013). The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1928–1936.
65.
LiuY.LiY.TaoL.WangY. (2008). Relationship stability, trust and relational risk in marketing channels: Evidence from China. Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 432–446.
66.
LópezM. V.GarciaA.RodriguezL. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285–300.
67.
LoveI.ZicchinoL. (2006). Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46, 190–210.
68.
LucasM. T.NoordewierT. G. (2016). Environmental management practices and firm financial performance: The moderating effect of industry pollution-related factors. International Journal of Production Economics, 175, 24–34.
69.
LuoX. (2007). Consumer negative voice and firm-idiosyncratic stock returns. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 75–88.
70.
LuoX. (2009). Quantifying the long-term impact of negative word of mouth on cash flows and stock prices. Marketing Science, 28, 148–165.
71.
LuoX.BhattacharyaC. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.
72.
LuoX.HomburgC.WiesekeJ. (2010). Customer satisfaction, analyst stock recommendations, and firm value. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 1041–1058.
73.
MahmoodI. P.ZhuH.ZajacE. J. (2011). Where can capabilities come from? Network ties and capability acquisition in business groups. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 820–848.
74.
MakadokR. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387–401.
75.
MascarenhasB.AakerD. A. (1989). Strategy over the business cycle. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 199–210.
76.
MasonR. B. (2008). Word of mouth as a promotional tool for turbulent markets. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14, 207–224.
77.
MattinglyJ. E.BermanS. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45, 20–46.
78.
MauryB.PajusteA. (2005). Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 1813–1834.
79.
McClarenN. (2000). Ethics in personal selling and sales management: A review of the literature focusing on empirical findings and conceptual foundations. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 285–303.
80.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.
81.
MenaS.RintamäkiJ.FlemingP.SpicerA. (2016). On the forgetting of corporate irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 41, 720–738.
82.
MongaA. B.JohnD. R. (2008). When does negative brand publicity hurt? The moderating influence of analytic versus holistic thinking. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 320–332.
83.
MorsingM. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: On the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 171–182.
84.
MullerA.KräusslR. (2011). Doing good deeds in times of need: A strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 911–929.
85.
NevinsJ. L.BeardenW. O.MoneyB. (2007). Ethical values and long-term orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 261–274.
86.
NielsenA. E.ThomsenC. (2009). Investigating CSR communication in SMEs: A case study among Danish middle managers. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18, 83–93.
87.
OrlitzkyM. (2011). Institutional logics in the study of organizations: The social construction of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 409–444.
88.
PaladinoA. (2008). Analyzing the effects of market and resource orientations on innovative outcomes in times of turbulence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 577–592.
PauwelsK.Silva-RissoJ.SrinivasanS.HanssensD. M. (2004). New products, sales promotions, and firm value: The case of the automobile industry. Journal of Marketing, 68, 142–156.
91.
PavlouP. A.El SawyO. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42, 239–273.
92.
PelozaJ. (2006). Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48, 52–72.
93.
PriemR. L.RasheedA. M.KotulicA. G. (1995). Rationality in strategic decision processes, environmental dynamism and firm performance. Journal of Management, 21, 913–929.
94.
PulligC.NetemeyerR. G.BiswasA. (2006). Attitude basis, certainty, and challenge alignment: A case of negative brand publicity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 528–542.
95.
RenneboogL.ter HorstJ.ZhangC. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1723–1742.
96.
RobertsP. W.DowlingG. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077–1093.
97.
RoseC.ThomsenS. (2004). The impact of corporate reputation on performance: Some Danish evidence. European Management Journal, 22, 201–210.
98.
RufB. M.MuralidharK.BrownR. M.JanneyJ. J.PaulK. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 143–156.
99.
SchilkeO. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 179–203.
100.
SenS.BhattacharyaC. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225–243.
101.
SenS.BhattacharyaC. B.KorschunD. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 158–166.
102.
SimerlyR. L.LiM. (2000). Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 31–49.
103.
SimsC. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48, 1–48.
104.
SimsR. (2009). Toward a better understanding of organizational efforts to rebuild reputation following an ethical scandal. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 453–472.
105.
SiomkosG.TriantafillidouA.VassilikopoulouA.TsiamisI. (2010). Opportunities and threats for competitors in product-harm crises. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28, 770–791.
106.
SismeiroC.MizikN.BucklinR. E. (2012). Modeling coexisting business scenarios with time-series panel data: A dynamics-based segmentation approach. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29, 134–147.
107.
SongM.Di BenedettoC. A.ParryM. E. (2009). The impact of formal processes for market information acquisition and utilization on the performance of Chinese new ventures. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26, 314–323.
108.
SoundararajanV.SpenceL. J.ReesC. (2018). Small business and social irresponsibility in developing countries: Working conditions and “evasion” institutional work. Business & Society, 57, 1301–1336.
109.
SridharS.NarayananS.SrinivasanR. (2014). Dynamic relationships among R&D, advertising, inventory and firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42, 277–290.
110.
SrivastavaR. K.ShervaniT. A.FaheyL. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62, 2–18.
111.
StephenA. T.ToubiaO. (2010). Deriving value from social commerce networks. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 215–228.
112.
StoelM. D.MuhannaW. A. (2009). IT capabilities and firm performance: A contingency analysis of the role of industry and IT capability type. Information & Management, 46, 181–189.
113.
StrikeV. M.GaoJ.BansalP. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of U.S. firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 850–862.
114.
SudhirK. (2001). Competitive pricing behavior in the auto market: A structural analysis. Marketing Science, 20, 42–60.
115.
SweetinV. H.KnowlesL. L.SummeyJ. H.McQueenK. S. (2013). Willingness-to-punish the corporate brand for corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1822–1830.
116.
SzékelyF.KnirschM. (2005). Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal, 23, 628–647.
TirunillaiS.TellisG. J. (2012). Does chatter really matter? Dynamics of user-generated content and stock performance. Marketing Science, 31, 198–215.
119.
TrainorK. J.AndzulisJ. M.RappA.AgnihotriR. (2014). Social media technology usage and customer relationship performance: A capabilities-based examination of social CRM. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1201–1208.
120.
UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35–67.
121.
VerbeekM. (2004). A guide to modern econometrics (2nd ed.). John Wiley, The Atrium.
122.
WagnerM. (2010). Corporate social performance and innovation with high social benefits: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 581–594.
123.
WagnerT.BicenP.HallZ. R. (2008). The dark side of retailing: Towards a scale of corporate social irresponsibility. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 36, 124–142.
124.
WilliamsG.ZinkinJ. (2008). The effect of culture on consumers’ willingness to punish irresponsible corporate behaviour: Applying Hofstede’s typology to the punishment aspect of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 1, 210–226.
